Recap: Cavs 99, Pacers 94 (Or, 60% of the game, the Cavs play hard every game)
2010-03-18Overview: Despite showing inconsistent effort throughout the game, the Cavaliers were able to hold on late against the Pacers, 99-94. LeBron James came a rebound and an assist away from triple-doubles on consecutive nights, and Antawn Jamison added 17 points for the Cavaliers. With the win, the Cavaliers clinched the Central Division title.
Cavs-Related Bullets:
-The Pacers kept pace with the Cavs by using a three-pronged attack of Roy Hibbert, contested jumpers, and exploiting the Cavs’ second unit. In the first quarter, the Pacers made 10 of their 17 shots from outside of the paint, including three of their four three-point attempts.
Some of the jumpers were on good looks because the Cavs fell asleep on Murphy on the perimeter, a few were shots by Earl Watson, Brandon Rush, and Dahntay Jones that the Cavs were happy to live with, and a few were Roy Hibbert draining hooks from the 10-12 foot range.
Hibbert was doing the most damage, which is understandable. When a strong 7-2 center with good footwork and touch with either hand goes up against a team missing its centers, there are going to be problems. He wasn’t getting layups against Varejao, which is about all that Varejao could have been asked to do. The Cavs brought a few doubles at Hibbert eventually, but they didn’t change up their entire gameplan and give the Pacers a chance to get hot from outside.
-In the second quarter, the Pacers went cold from outside, but were able to get in the paint against the Cavs’ second unit. The Pacers scored 10 points in the five minutes LeBron sat, with all of their points coming on dunks, layups, or free throws. The second unit is the squad that really feels the loss of Shaq; without him, they don’t have anybody who can defend the rim or get shots at the basket, and the bench has become much more of a weakness since Shaq got hurt.
LeBron actually compounded the problem by recording three turnovers and missing a shot on the Cavs’ first four possessions after he came in. When the dust settled, the Cavs were down 37-42, and Mike Brown decided it was time to have a chat. The Cavs settled down on both ends after that, and held a slim lead going into the half.
-In the third quarter, the Cavaliers absolutely dominated. They locked down the Pacers on defense, started moving the ball, and then LeBron got hot from the outside. LeBron hit four long jumpers in the third, and after his fourth the Cavs were up 76-61 and the game looked pretty much over. Unfortunately for the Cavs, they knew that all too well. LeBron and the Cavs started to play a little too loose, and the Pacers were able to catch the Cavs’ second unit napping at the beginning of the fourth.
-The Pacers went on a 12-4 run during the four minutes LeBron sat, which was enough to cut the Cavalier lead to 10. The Pacers kept draining deep jumpers and getting to the line, and the Cavs couldn’t get any of the open threes that fell against Detroit to go. With 4:13 to go, the Pacers had cut the lead to one.
-That’s around when LeBron decided that he’d had enough of this. LeBron found Andy for a layup, finished an alley-oop from Andy, and took the ball to the rack to put the Cavs back up eight. Then he took a horrible jumper, missed it, and promptly stole the ball back, went coast-to-coast, and found Jamison for a layup. After A.J. Price hit a three to cut the lead to four, LeBron hit a fadeaway in the lane to put the game away for the Cavs. In three minutes, the game had gone from scary to in the bag, all thanks to LeBron. Only Cavs fans understand that this statement is almost as much of an insult as a compliment, but LeBron is just too good sometimes.
Other notes:
-Riddle me this: LeBron almost never turned it over that much while he was running the point full-time, but with Mo finally back on his game he’s turned the ball over 10 times in his last two games.
-Brandon Rush blocked LeBron’s layup in the fourth to slay the decoy pick-and-roll. Congratulations to that young man. He defeated the Kracken. (By the way, would it be most helpful for me to refer to that play as the “Decoy Pick-and-Roll,” “My Favorite Play Ever,” or “The Kracken,” from now on? I just kind of like picturing the team going over to the bench and Mike Brown saying “Release the Kracken!” during a time-out. I’ll stop talking now.)
-Antawn Jamison’s trigger on mid-range jumpers is still too quick. The Cavs’ offense is capable of finding a better look than a 19-foot jumper with 15 seconds on the shot clock. If it’s wide-open, take it to keep the defense honest — this is how Big Z makes his living. But Jamison’s too eager to let that thing fly right now. Worst of all, I fear he’s become a bad influence on JJ, who’s off the mid-range jumper wagon right now.
-To be perfectly clear: STOP SHOOTING MID-RANGE JUMPERS, JJ. If you need one of Jerry Lucas’ memory books to remember this, that can be arranged.
-Anderson Varejao creates angles on the pick-and-roll so beautifully. I feel like we must remind ourselves of this every few days.
-I’ve noticed this for a while but can never remember to put it in a recap: Does Anthony Parker ever drive to his left? Ever?
-Jawad Williams makes the dreaded pretty mistakes. He handles the ball well, his stroke is very nice, he’s got good footwork. The issue is that he often uses those skills to set himself with contested jumpers off the dribble early in the clock, which looks nice on the micro level but is horrible on the macro level.
Worst of all, Jawad seems to be keeping Jamario out of the rotation. Jamario makes hideous mistakes, but he also brings a lot of very good things to the table when he plays, and he doesn’t need the ball to do it.
Bullets of Randomness:
-In day two of the “See? Trading for me wouldn’t have been so bad!” tour, Troy Murphy went 4-7 from deep, had 15 rebounds, and somehow made five assists. I still think the Cavs are worlds better off with Jamison — I don’t trust a 7-footer who can have a good game and shoot 2-7 from two-point range.
-A.J. Price does not lack for confidence. He’ll be a solid scoring guard if he gets a little bit more discipline — how does he take three more shots than Roy Hibbert in this game?
-From what I saw tonight, I don’t see how Mike Dunleavy’s career can be salvaged.
I think Mo is very important to the success of the Cavs and will be in the playoffs. However, the last thing we need in an Orlando or possible LA series is a streak shooting volume shooter on a cold run. We have too many good offensive options for him to soak up shots and possessions, especially when lets be honest, he brings little else to the table. Shaq need shots, Jamison needs shots, and of course lebron needs shots. We cant have Mo shooting 4-14 and expect to win. If boobie can come in and sit in the corner… Read more »
I just think it’s silly to have so much faith in a guy because of one series way back in 2006…that’s to long ago. James Posey has hit some really big shots in his playoff career..who’s ready to turn him loose and give him some big-time minutes on a contending team (yes, I know he plays for New Orleans…it’s hypothetical). Anyway, the last line Krolik. Is it supposed to read “I don’t see how Dunleavy’s career cannot be salvaged?” It’s kind of confusing me. Does that mean you DO see that Dunleavy’s career CAN be salvaged? Not sure if the… Read more »
Rich: You said: “What I don’t get is your insistance on Mo being lost, but yet you never seem to criticize JJ.” I answer that in one of my comments on Krolik’s game recap. Basically, it doesn’t bother me because JJ is developing and isn’t going to really play any meaningful minutes in the playoffs. There’s no way he takes minutes away from Varejao or Jamison, so unless you think he’s going to be playing center on a team with Shaq and Z, he’s just not going to play much. And honestly I could see Brown even giving some of… Read more »
Here is the tiny url for their comparison:
http://www.basketball-reference.com/play-index/tiny.cgi?id=HTmSd
Plenty of interesting stuff. I think if I had ONE question to ask mike brown right now it would be to explain the thought processes on minute allocations.
yeah, sorry just to clarify on that defensive rating, i didnt put it very clearly:
Mo williams allows 106 points per 100 (or per game? whats the metric?) while Daniel Gibson allows 108 per 100 (or whatever it is)
And I’m not sure which Krolik you’re talking about, because in this write-up he said “with Mo back on his game…” Krolik has been back on the Mo bandwagon and got off of the Mo is lost train a few games back. I’m not saying everyone should, but saying that Krolik is saying he looks lost is mis-leading.
Now, Isaac, don’t you know the number’s gurus will only like the numbers if they support their claims. Ok, Tom, do something with that defensive rating and explain that one to me. It isn’t like Boobie is coming in and guarding anyone’s best player. People are WAY over-hyping Gibson’s defense…I mean way way over-hyping. Again, how is 3/5 a volume scorer. The only arguement that I can see that can be made is that if Mo plays like Boobie, then Boobie should get the nod simply cause of defense…but, as the numbers show, that isn’t really that accurate. BTW, guards… Read more »
Im undecided on the whole boobie issue. I have alot of faith in MB’s decisions so I figure he has his reasons. But on a couple of points; according to Basketball reference, Mo actually has a better defensive rating than boobie, 108 to 106. And if we are going to bring up the playoff meltdown, boobie put in a .325 fg% with .357% on threes performance. His PER was 5.5, while Mo went .408 and .372, with a PER of 13. So its hardly as clear cut as people seem to be saying. Yeah, boobie is having a great year,… Read more »
Jawad: 20 minutes, 3 points, plus/minus of -19.
Jamario: DNP-CD
Gibson: DNP-CD
Something is wrong with this picture …
Here’s the most important part of the game:
With the win, the Cavs are now 34-0 when entering the fourth quarter with at least a 6 point lead. Just let that sink in for a moment. The literally HAVE NOT LOST! That is insane! (Of course, I probably jinxed them… knock on wood)
Rich – with Jamison taking more shots, do we need a volume scorer that’s struggling to fit into the offense running the point? That’s all I’m saying. In the past we needed Mo to score 18 a game for the Cavs to have a chance against good teams. I’m not sure that is the case anymore. I just get tired of watching him go under every screen and making heroes out of all these points guards. When he gets hot and hits a bunch of shots obviously I love it, but he seems very streaky to me. I also question… Read more »
Hibbert helped people understand how much the Cavs need Shaq for Orlando. Even with MB’s defense minded strategy, if the Cavs are forced to doubleteam down low – they don’t have the size or quickness to get to the perimiter to contest 3s. I still believe the Cavs are better without Shaq (or Z) when they play teams without a true or ‘big’ center. However, they are much better with Shaq when the opposting team has a strong center. Seeing how the team can plaly well big or small, slow or fast gives MB lot’s of options and it will… Read more »
Rich – as John pointed out, Mo looks lost. And yes, he almost needs to hit 6 threes to make up for his defensive deficiencies right now. My point is this. I’ve said before that Mo brings a lot to the table that Boobie doesn’t. But if Mo is going to be relegated to only scoring when he plays off LeBron and doing most of his damage on corner 3s….Boobie will do the same thing at a higher percentage, will play better defense, and will rebound better. obviously if Mo is going to be Mo the point guard that can… Read more »
And I’m sorry I can’t let this go but the expectations of the two players are so vastly different, but yet we act as if they are the same. Since when was going 3-5 a funk? And getting 7 assists. Again, if Daniel Gibson goes 3-5 and gets 7 assists…good lord the entire cavs nation is lighting up with joy about how Boobie is just really good. Perspective people.
WOW! Ok, Tom, so everytime Mo doesn’t hit 6 threes a game he is now back in his funk? ok then. It’s so funny how our expectations of Mo compared to Gibson work. If Gibson goes out and gets 11 points we would be praising him till the end of days…if Mo does it, then it’s a funk. Ok then. Seriously, everytime Mo doesn’t light it up doesn’t mean it’s time to suddenly declare that he is in a funk of some sort. Mo snapped out of the funk against San Antonio and has played well since.
LBJ snap pass plus Tawn’s quick release under the hoop has got to be the fastest route from 3 pt line to bottom of net that I’ve ever seen. It’s like a magic trick.
JK, I love your titles! Anchorman is such a versatile movie, it applies to anything! I’m also glad we didn’t trade for Murphy. He played much better than past time we played the Pacers, but still… I’m good with ‘Tawn. At the end of the game it was almost like you could see Lebron switch to beast-mode. Every play on defense he was going for a block or steal and looking to get back down the floor. It was great to see. And the heat-check threes went! As much as I hate when he does it, I picture him eying… Read more »
I like “the Kracken”, but we have to call it the Medusa when Andy runs it.
If Mike Brown would name all of his offensive sets after Greek Mythological beasts, I think he would win COY again.
And I’m 100% positive that LeIso is called Pegasus in the Cavs playbook.
Sorry, didn’t mean to post all that as Tsunami. Something wrong with my browser.
Everyone is on the “Cavs are so much better without Shaq/Z” bandwagon and this game reminded me why I didn’t get on in the first place. Having bigs that can score stabilizes your offense. Sure, it’s nice to be able to “get out and run” and “turn defense into transition buckets” but having guys 7 foot plus that can put the ball in the hoop and require some serious boxing out from the offensive glass is invaluable. See: Lakers. Roy Hibbert kept Indiana in the game. Without him, all the streak shooting that Indy had means nothing. And on the… Read more »
“The Kracken” sounds like an appropriate name for it…I wonder what it’s true shooting percentage is?
Also…The Cavs had a choice between Hibbert and Hickson in the draft; did they make the right choice?