6 Deep: Coming into Focus
2014-06-241.) Your favorite NBA finals moment was?
Tom: Ginobili’s dunk on Bosh. Had I been in San Antonio I would have rushed the court. Before security could get to me I’d have run up to Bosh to say “good job, good effort!” I’d do LeBron’s push-up dance as I was being hauled off. Maybe sneak an elbow to the nuts on Ray Ray in revenge for Varejao. #neverforget
Ben: Manu’s leap-back 3 (steps don’t cover 8 feet) with the crowd already delirious from his Throwback-Throwdown. As I was still bouncing around from the dunk, I just started giggling when I saw him gather his footwork. There are some shots that you just know are going in.
Robert: The Spurs coming back from being down 22-6 to start Game 5 and still completely running away with the game. It turned from “Okay, now the Spurs won’t win back in Miami for Game 6 setting up a terrifying Game 7 where you’d have to be nuts to bet against LeBron” into a Spurs clinic in a matter of minutes. Following that (il)logic, the Spurs actually won three games by coming back in that one. We all knew Pop was good, but winning games that haven’t even happened yet? Yow-za…
David: Anytime Kawhi Leonard decided that no lead was big enough. In Game 3, with 5:39 left to go and the Spurs up by 14, LeBron stole a pass and tossed it to an upcourt Ray Allen. Leonard said “no way” and scared Ray into missing the layup. In Game 4 with 5:17 left and the Spurs up by more than 20, Leonard hounded Dwyane Wade at the arc, poking his hands in for four seconds trying to get a steal until he finally snagged it.
Nate: When LeBron cramped up with a case of “bitter beer face” in game one. The air conditioning game was so very old school: players ran around in 90 degree heat, LeBron didn’t hydrate properly, and Miami’s depth problem got turned up to 11. It was obvious from that game on, that the Spurs wanted it more, were more prepared, and weren’t going to give the Heat any breaks when the starters went to the bench. It was also the least prepared I’ve seen Miami since 2011. Did anyone see LeBron drinking fluids that game? As Tony Rizzo said, “I’ve seen high school football teams doing more on the sidelines to combat dehydration than I saw on that Miami bench” (paraphrased). I thought, “This series could be over already” when LeBron pulled up lame after a layup. It wasn’t that I was happy he was on the sideline, but as Cleveland fans, we’ve seen it before, right? I loved Tony Parkers’s comment after the game, “I want to play the real Miami Heat.”
Mallory: Without question, it was seeing Tim Duncan and Pop get emotional as they won. No single finals moment stood out more than that, largely because of how dominant the Spurs were during game play. It was clear, however, that Duncan and Pop both wanted to take in the moment as they won their fifth NBA championship together. Realizing they might not be back together again probably made the moment feel that much bigger.
2.) David Blatt is the new coach of the Cavs. What will the Cavaliers’ identity be?
Tom: Hopefully Blatt will punish them so dramatically they will play like their very lives depend on it. Players on this team spent so much time not moving last season, despite being one of the youngest teams in the league. Blatt needs to go Norman Dale on their behinds. First day he should tell Kyrie “I don’t care if you play on the team or not.” (the “it” line that comes right after this clip ends)
Ben: I sincerely hope the Cavs adopt his micro approach. “I’m a micro coach. I don’t see the big picture during a game. It’s of no interest to me. I’m seeing the play in front of me.” Blatt’s squads have always overachieved their talent level. That is directly because he teaches process and not result. Like Popovich, a blown assignment is reason for a timeout, regardless of situation.
Robert: Hopefully, it will be similar to the identities of the teams he’s coached recently: an offense where the ball and players move, a defense built on speed and aggressiveness — and the ability of the coach to adapt his system to best fit the strengths of the players on his roster. Hopefully, Cavs fans will allow Blatt to adjust to the NBA game and allow his players to learn from him rather than rush to judgement about either.
David: The Cavs’ identity is going to be winning and speed. Blatt has had a 222-55 record in his last four seasons with Macabbi Tel Aviv. That’s an excellent run, and it wasn’t the product of juggernaut squads. He seems to find success wherever he goes which means he’s good at adapting to his situation. The Cavs play best when they are in transition, so Blatt is going to be playing a trapping defense to get turnovers and allow the team to set up before the opposition’s defense can.
Nate: I hate to say it, but we don’t know yet. We’ll know in about two and a half weeks. The draft and free agency will completely change the face of this team. My hope? A fast paced, ball-movement oriented team that plays defense with a lot of ball pressure to force turnovers, and that passes well in the half court. But until there are some major change, this team is going to be what it’s been the last several years: a jump-shooting team that is soft on defense after you get past the initial pressure: the Cleveland Hawes-aliers, if you will.
Mallory: This one is tough to answer, largely because what most of us know about Blatt is sparse. As we covered in Monday’s podcast, Blatt’s biggest identity seems to be utilizing what he has to the absolute best of their abilities, something the Cavs have badly needed the past three seasons. If, as Ben said in the podcast, Blatt offense is one of precise ball movement and constant motion, I think the style will perfectly mesh with this Cavaliers roster.
3.) Now that Joel Embiid has undergone foot surgery and David Blatt was selected, who will the Cavs draft?
Tom: I assume they will not draft Embiid. So I will guess 40% Wiggins, 30% Parker, 20% Trade, 10% Other, which could include drafting Embiid.
Ben: Wiggins is and has been the number 1 pick. Embiid’s workout video and film study swayed me for a bit, but ultimately, Wiggins is the best talent. (Not being broken is a talent too.) People keep claiming Parker is the most NBA ready player in the draft. I’m pretty sure NBA players need to defend as well. Wiggins is as gifted defensively as Parker is offensively, and his offensive game isn’t nearly as disastrous as Parker’s D.
Robert: Joel Embiid… though not necessarily at No. 1. Now, I’m not saying this is a lock. A lot is riding on Embiid’s post-surgery medical records. He is absolutely the best fit for this team — and if you follow the logic that Kyrie Irving and Anderson Varejao aren’t necessarily injury prone players because all of their injuries are “freak” (i.e. not chronic, centering on one part of the body) you can say the same about Embiid. The Cavs don’t need to be safe. They need to take the player who they feel will have the largest transformative effect on this team long team. If they still feel Embiid is that player (again, I’m not stupid, this is now a very, very, very big “if”), they should take him.
David: This is where the world is going to see who is running the team. As much as I’m sure David Blatt wants to build something sustainable and be a future title contender, he probably wants to win right now to avoid talk about whether he is “ready for the NBA.” Jabari Parker is going to help him win right now and give him one more NBA-level player. Joel Embiid and Andrew Wiggins may be better than Parker in the long run, but won’t have the right amount of impact short term for Blatt. It is going to be the war of the Davids with this pick. Griffin probably wants to take Wiggins, but Parker will win out as Blatt talks about how well he is going to fit into his offensive game plan.
Nate: If they stick with the pick, they’ll take Parker. But I don’t think they’re sticking with the pick. Philly wants Wiggins too badly, and Jabari Parker is a player who just doesn’t make sense for Cleveland if they’re committed to Anthony Bennett. Jabari Parker is six-foot, 8.5-inches tall, with a six-foot 11.5-inch wing span, and weighs 240 pounds. Bennett is six-foot seven-inches with a 7.1-inch wing span and weighs 240 pounds. They have very similar body types, and even more similar games. Oh, and playing them together would be a defensive nightmare. That being said, the commitment to Bennett may not be there. Dan Gilbert just paid a coach $16 million to go away, so he’s never afraid to cut bait. But like I said, I don’t think they’re keeping the pick (see below). So, Mardanjoseph Exbiismart?
Mallory: This answer is easy, breezy – the clear cut choice (if the Cavs decide to move with the #1 overall) is Wiggins. No other player (including Embiid) has the combination of immediate impact and upside – Wiggins is already a plus plus defender, and has made large strides in his perceived areas of weakness (ball handling, shooting) in just a few short weeks. To say he’s athletic is an insult to his athletic abilities, and he’s clearly a good kid with a straight head on his shoulders. Basically, the pick is a no brainer. That is, unless…(see below!)
4.) Come up with a reasonable draft day trade. Nate, I said reasonable.
Tom: I don’t think they’ll trade the No. 1 pick, and I have no idea who they might even be targeting. A reasonable draft day trade would be the No. 1 for Philly’s No. 3 and Nerlens Noel. The problem is that Parker and Wiggins will most likely be gone at that point and now you filled your rim-protector spot but still have that gaping hole at SF.
Ben: I really don’t see the Cavs trading the No. 1 pick. Yet, if the Sixers are terrified they won’t get Wiggins they could attempt something crazy like three, ten, and Noel for the top overall. I could see the Cavs taking that offer and selecting Exum at three. His size allows some serious lineup flexibility. I don’t think it would be a great move for either team, but the Sixers tanked a whole season for Wiggins. Who knows how far the love affair would drive them. I think it is less likely that the Cavs would trade Kyrie now that Blatt is in Cleveland. He has had great success with scoring point guards, and his defensive schemes are better at hiding deficiencies. Blatt has a nasty little 1-1-3 Zone that could help Kyrie in PnR defense. A little pragmatism goes a long way.
Robert: Orlando trades Arron Afflalo and the number four pick to the Cavs for the first and 33rd.
David: The Cavs could trade the No. 1 pick to Philadelphia for their No. 3 and No. 10 picks. The team takes Joel Embiid at three and then takes Dario Saric or Doug McDermott at ten.
Nate: You’re Dan Gilbert. You just watched a seven-foot beast come in and have a jaw-dropping workout, only to find out that he has a broken foot. Last year, your team wanted you to draft a tweener forward who will probably have defensive problems in the pros. Now, they want you to do the same thing? Meanwhile, Kevin Love is sitting there in Minnesota. You have to be saying, “why am I drafting another tweener when one of the best power forwards in the game is available?” So the goal will be to trade back enough to get the assets to get a Kevin Love and still get a draft pick in this loaded draft. This was a five deep draft before the Embiid injury, and five is probably a nice spot for Embiid (does a hobbled Embiid trump a healthy Vonleh?) So the Cavs should trade back to three. Cleveland trades for the third the 10th, Thaddeus Young, and Nerlens Noel and offers up the first, Anthony Bennett, and Tristan Thompson? That works, right? And if Milwaukee gets crazy and takes Exum, then the Cavs trade back again, this time to Utah. Utah trades the fifth, the 23rd and Derrick Favors for the third pick and Sergey Karasev. David Griffin picks up the phone and calls Flip Saunders. “Hey Flip… (awkward silence), so we’ll trade you the fifth pick, Derrick Favors, Dion Waiters, Memphis’ first, and the 23rd for Kevin Love, Kevin Martin, and the 13th pick. We’ll even throw in a very low interest loan on your new house in Minnesota. No questions asked.” Flip accedes. Cleveland drafts Kyle Anderson at 13 and he turns out to be the the best player in the draft. They sign-and-trade for LeBron and win a lot of trophies. That’s “reasonable,” right? I have a flow-chart.
Mallory: …As I said above, Wiggins is the no brainer pick. But the real no brainer is trading the pick (plus some of Chris Grant’s famous “assets”) for a serious impact player. The player? Kevin Love. What the Cavaliers do NOT need is more “talented” bodies on the roster – they’ve already got a ton of young guys with “upside.” What they do need, however, are guys who can come in and immediately make an impact all over the court. Kevin Love does that. Trading the first overall pick, plus Anthony Bennett and/or TT and/or Waiters should get the job done. It’s risky to trade for Love, as there’s no promise he’ll re-sign. But I can’t imagine a team of Kyrie, Love, free agent X, and whoever is left on the roster NOT competing immediately. Especially if He-Who-Shall-Not-Be-Named makes a return.
5.) How do you feel about the narrative that the Cavs reputation is bad and Dan Gilbert is mostly to blame?
Tom: It may be true but the arguments are all sorts of flimsy, reductive, and often counter-intuitive. Why does it reflect poorly on Gilbert that he ate $20 million and was willing to spend another $60 million on coaching? That’s ACTUALLY “whatever it takes”. It’s not like Cal turned down the Cavs to coach a rec team in North Korea, he’s making almost the same amount where he is a demi-god and has total control of an entire state. I like that Gilbert takes big swings. Why does Anthony Bennett make the Cavs a laughing stock? I’d STILL rather have him than anyone else (total lie: I’d rather have Noel) in that dumpster fire draft. The Cavs don’t know how to draft? OK well the owner fired the GM and hired the guy that everyone around the league apparently respects – so they will change how they draft. While the rest of the league claims to hate tanking, the Cavs actually refused to tank (even when all logic dictated it) and they deserved to be mocked for how they’re run? And now they hired a coach that everyone will not stop gushing over. Gilbert cares as much as any owner in the league, and I don’t believe any owner in the NBA will outspend him (all things being equal). To me, the organization feels more unlucky (Jarrett Jack was a great FA pickup before he wasn’t) than systemically dysfunctional. And if it’s actually the latter, I’m going to need more convincing. The burden of proof is off the guy that dropped $20 (effectively 40) million to counter Dwight Howard and was willing to spend $30 million to buy draft picks. In business, you CAN buy credibility.
Ben: It’s just silly. Gilbert doesn’t skimp on anything. He is willing to accept responsibility for any failures (and yes, there have been quite a few). By all accounts he treats his employees exceptionally well. It is a tired narrative that reeks of anti-Cleveland sentiment. Sigh.
Robert: I know plenty of non-Cleveland-based writers who love to rag on what a terrible owner Dan Gilbert is. Most of these people also happen to be Knicks fans, so they’re mainly just tired of the continued horror that is James Dolan running their team. Still, let’s pull back for a second. Since Dan Gilbert took over the team in 2005, the team is on its sixth head coach (Paul Silas, Brendan Malone [interim], Mike Brown, Byron Scott, Mike Brown again and now Blatt). During two of the coaching searches, he has aggressively pursued a top college coach: Tom Izzo in 2010 and John Calipari in 2014. He’s also on his fourth General Manager and he followed the loss of his team’s biggest star with a vitriolic letter that looks worse the further away we get from it. This is not to say that Gilbert is a meddling owner, as he’s often portrayed. It’s just that he’s only had one period — the LeBron James/Mike Brown/Danny Ferry years of 2005-2010, roughly a third of his time as owner — where his franchise has experienced any sustained continuity. No one’s saying that Gilbert won’t spend money. No one’s (really) saying that Gilbert’s a heel. He’s just had nearly two-thirds of his time as owner when the team was in enough of a state of flux — a state he has no doubt tried to change by getting involved — to have his actions construed as meddling or undercutting his front office. Give Dan some stability and the perception of him and of the franchise will improve, as well.
David: It’s bogus. People said that Mark Cuban was an annoying owner and out of hand before he calmed down a little and won a title. Dan Gilbert wants to win and I want to win, so he’s good in my book. Any player that comes to Cleveland should want to win and be thrilled that the owner is willing do anything that will make the team better, even if it means spending tons of money and taking risks.
Nate: Dan Gilbert wrote a very stupid letter in 2010 that we all loved. Instead of filing it in his “Deleted Items” folder, he hit “Send,” and he’s been paying for it ever since. But the blame for the current Cavs situation? That falls squarely on the shoulders of Chris Grant. Dan Gilbert wasn’t a San Diego State Aztec Torero running pick-and rolls with Mike Brown. Dan Gilbert didn’t decide that “analytics” pointed to Tristan Thompson in 2011, Dion Waiters in 2012, and Anthony Bennett in 2013. Dan Gilbert probably didn’t know Earl Clark from Earl Monroe. I highly doubt that Dan Gilbert was in favor of Kyrie Irving+D-Leaguers for two years running. Dumping the Herculoids after 2013? I’m betting that was all Chris Grant. So yeah, the Cavs reputation is bad, and it’s 80% Grant’s fault, and he’s the guy making it worse. Have you noticed that Brian Windhorst’s “sources” from inside the Cavs have dried up since Chris Grant left? Yet, Windy keeps reporting that the Cavs reputation is “mud?” And he keeps showing up on local radio talking about how the Cavs’ owner is the problem? Dan Gilbert does have a problem. He paid a lot of money to a guy who won’t stop badmouthing him when things didn’t work out.
Oy. Sam Amico had it best in April when he said, “Chris Grant has been spinning stories.” One insider told Amico that Grant, “is considered a buffoon around the league: Dishonest, incapable, and full of (beans).” Furthermore, “Grant now has a reputation as someone who is attempting to tell the world the Cavs will be one huge disaster without him… sources have agendas.” I respect Brian Windhorst, and he has been a friend to this blog, but it seems like everyone with a Cavs axe to grind finds his ear. They could at least spread out the bashing to some other reporters.
Mallory: This is sort of a silly argument. In the NBA, reputations can so quickly be written and rewritten. For example, the Clippers. Four or five years ago they were a laughing stock. After drafting Blake, trading for Chris Paul, and then trading for Doc, it was perceived Sterling had opened his wallet and they were finally ready to be the alpha-team in LA. Now Sterling is out, and the team is again in flux. The point? Nothing is definite in this league. All it takes is winning – once that happens, all else is forgiven.
6.) Pretend LeBron James reads CavsTheBlog. Send him your own personalized message here:
Tom: You’ve reached a point where you can effectively be a player-gm. You can make whatever reality you want as far as roster construction. Maybe you noticed what the Spurs just achieved. It was sweet. Redemption, perfection, legacy: they got there because their most important players committed to each other and to the Spurs. That organization has been able to create a system and fill it with perfectly complimenting players because they were never held hostage by free agency. Your organization is run by a sociopath that thinks he can taunt you into committing to his mafia family while they refuse to use their mid-level exception. Comical. Ask Dwyane Wade how much fun he had in the prime of his career while the Heat sabotaged their team, refused to spend for years, and drafted Michael Beasley. Thank God you and Bosh colluded to save them from 40-win seasons. The way the Spurs did it, the way the Mavericks did it…that’s mutual commitment between players, management, and fans. You committed to Miami, and brought as many people as your could to South Beach. The fans sure love leaving your games early. Your management sure hates going into the luxury tax. You never committed fully to the Cavs. I guess you and Miami deserved each other. You got some, they got some. But you seem comfortable in your own skin now. No one can question your game anymore. So go build something real already. And please, wherever you go, create some rivalries.
Ben: My father often says that boredom is severely underrated. Don’t be afraid to bore yourself to historic greatness. Bore us with early post position, quick ball swings to the weak-side, and well timed help defense. Save us from heat check threes, one-on-one hero ball and World Cup level flops. You are the most talented player in the history of the NBA. You won two championships because you finally understood that when you establish early position on the block, you are literally unstoppable. Then, somehow, you forgot. I understand that getting early position isn’t fun for you. You don’t get any highlights from achieving the single most important thing you can do on the basketball court. It takes far more energy than being the de facto point guard. It’s tiring getting clobbered all day. And yes, you can do absolutely everything on the basketball floor, so it is fun to test your power. I get it. But for the love of basketball, play to your primary strengths. I want to see you completely realize your astounding potential. I want to witness true greatness, somewhat irrespective of your team. Bore me, LeBron. Often the divine is masked in simplicity.
Robert: Can you put me in touch with D-Wade? I’ve got some killer “Three the Hard Way” specs to pitch him.
David: The Cavs are on the rise, and, well, the Heat are not. Dwyane Wade is no longer better than you, and he isn’t even better than Mr. Bosh. If Wade isn’t taking a pay cut this year, you’re being insulted. Don’t let him get himself paid with cash instead of titles. Play for a team that has talent and no shortage of the chance for growth. The only growth for your current team is in how much Bengay they use after every game. So, take a risk to win championships for the next eight years instead of staying somewhere where the best chance for growth in your resume is as an investor in products for sore muscles.
Nate: My personal message? What do you tell a man you literally have nothing in common with other than the fact that you both enjoy basketball and once lived within 20 miles of each other? I guess we both prefer to play on the perimeter when we should be in the post, too… “Hi?” Oh, and “If you want to have a legacy like Tim Duncan’s get yourself to a team where you don’t have to play more than 35 minutes a night. If that’s the Cavs, great. If not, good luck, but I’ll be rooting against you.” Or something like that. Geez. that seems lame. I guess I just don’t have it in me to get emotionally invested in LeBron James again. It’s like writing in the yearbook of the girl who turned you down for the prom.
Mallory: Lebron, buddy – I know we went through some hard times. I hated you after the decision. That was one of the worst nights of my life – I couldn’t fathom why you would do that to your hometown. After the “not one, not two, not three…” speech, I was so fed up I considered forgetting about the NBA entirely. But as they say, time heals all wounds, and you now have a chance to make amends for your wrongdoings. Kyrie is here, a big pick is coming, and, if we have it my way, you’ll soon be teamed up with the best young PF in the NBA. Basically, forget those geriatrics in Miami (where, of course, all geriatrics go to live out the remainder of their lives) and get your butt back to Cleveland. I realize it’s cold – I was there in Feb 2007 when we got 30 inches of snow in 12 hours(!) – but that will just make a warm summer parade down Euclid that much sweeter. And then there’re the fans. Remember how Miami’s fans walked out after Game Four? You’ll never see that in Cleveland – they’ll be there until the very end. In short – do the right thing man. See you in a few months!
Maybe the Cavs can trade the #1 pick to Utah for Favors and #5 and then surprise everyone by drafting McDermott? Sadly, this is a more likely scenario than Lebron coming back.
Trading the pick for Favors and #5 would be ridiculously stupid.
In defense of Andrew Wiggins, his star potential may be overrated but I think his floor is quite high as well. He didn’t look like a superstar in college but he was still a very good player for an elite program. He’s not a magician with the ball but his athleticism and solid shooting ability allowed him to be a good scorer, while defense remains the area where he shows the most promise. And again, he’s an ideal fit next to Kyrie Irving and Waiters. Their offensive brilliance means that we shouldn’t need or especially want another ball-dominant perimeter player,… Read more »
C’mon man, Mike Brown was a proud San Diego Torero, not an aztec…
You just Pwned me, Pete. Correction pending.
In the event of a Kevin Love trade, is there any way to immediately extend him or secure a verbal commitment to re-sign with the team? I’ve been assuming that’s impossible/illegal under the rules, and therefore he will definitely be a free agent next summer no matter where he gets traded.
I think trading with PHI for the #3 #10 young and maybe Noel would be the way to go. Sure you may lose out on someone who could develop into a superstar, but with all these pieces. Young negates the need for a SF (I know he’s listed as a PF but he can play the 3). Noel negates the need to worry about Embiid. So with the three take Exum. Now you have the #10, TT, and waiters we could conceivably trade to land an all star in a trade. That alone makes us better. Maybe we lure someone… Read more »
If Wade and Bosh opt in for Miami, they are finished. What are the chances of Wade not opting in? He is way over the hill and will never get an offer anywhere near what he can opt in for. Bosh might find a max contract somewhere, but they will be sorry. There is nothing Riley can do but insult players that go to greener pastures. Someone send him a supply of Comix Sans font.
Two days to go. Too many variables to consider. Anything can happen.
1. The Manu dunk … I would have Merton Hanks’d it from freethrow line to free throw line. 2.The Cavs identity will be sweet squiggly striped shirts. I don’t really know what the identity will be. If LeBron is on the team it will be so much more different than if he isn’t. I hope they are ebtter offensively and just hold their own on defense. 3. I am afraid the Cavs will draft Parker, I hope they draft Wiggins. Shame about Embiid. 4. There is no reasonable trade scenario. Pre Embiid I would have taken 3 and 10 from… Read more »
1. Manu dunk was awesome, but Kawhi’s pull-up three in game five was a great moment. It’s when Miami lost all hope of extending the series. 2. The Cavs will play much better under Blatt. There will be ball movement and some organization at the offensive end. The Cavs will be fun to watch. 3. If they keep the pick I’d like Exum or Wiggins or even Embiid. I just hope they don’t take Parker. 4. If Philly offers #3 and #10 we should take it – especially if they throw in T. Young. Otherwise, i’d also take the Magic’s… Read more »
No on the trades. Keep the pick. Take Wiggins. Don’t screw it up. Sign LeBron and Carmelo if they’ll come.
Lebron and Carmelo are not coming to Cleveland.
Wiggins is probably the best athlete in the draft, I’m just not convinced he’s the best player. I was on board with Embiid at #1 before the foot injury. My draft board is probably something along the lines of:
Embiid (if he’s healthy)
Exum
Wiggans
Parker
Smart
Since Embiid isn’t healthy, I’d prefer Exum to Wiggins – especially if we can trade down and get other assets in the process.
Where do people come up with this Lebron isn’t coming to Cleveland stuff? By no means would I bet on it happening (nor would I bet on him playing for any other team than the Heat next season) but it seems that so many throw away the idea like its not even possible. Most every analyst and inside seem to say Cleveland is one of the most likely teams to land Lebron if he leaves Miami – so what rationale does anyone have to think he wouldn’t return to Cleveland? I get why Melon is so doubtful as hes likely… Read more »
You never even seen Exum play against top-notch talent. How is Wiggins not ahead of him?
OMG – I’m glad to see Miami sweat a little bit like we did back in 2010. The Cavs have already had their best off-season in years by hiring Blatt and Lue. I believe that Blatt will get the most out of Cavs players and I’m very excited to see him coach. Meanwhile, if the Cavs aren’t jumping on the Jazz’ offer of #4, #12 and Afflalo then I suspect we are still hoping for Philly to cough up #3, #10 and a player (most likely T. Young). Either Afflalo or Young would have a much bigger immediate impact than… Read more »
Jazz’s offer has been some combination of #5, Favors, Burks, Heyward, #23, 2nd rounders and a future 1st rounder. The offer you mentioned was the Magic’s.
Yup – I knew I effed it up as soon as I submitted it.
But yeah, I’d probably take the Magic’s offer if we didn’t get a better one and take Embiid or Exum at #4. Not sure who’d be left at #10, but there’s going to be someone pretty good.
Read an interesting article on ESPN about teams making cap space to potentially get Melo AND LeBron. It mentioned the Cavs could do it ‘easily’ and keep Kyrie and the #1 pick while doing it. While I don’t really believe it would happen (but would love it), I do think it’s quite intriguing. I do believe that of all the teams that could get LeBron that Cleveland is high on that list (especially after the “home sweet home” tweet). But I think that even if we don’t get LeBron, we could at least be one of the teams that helps… Read more »
yeah – Windhorst talked about that article (which he co-wrote with Marc Stein) but pointed out that Melo isn’t coming to Cleveland.
Going out on a limb. 3 way trade. Cavs get 3rd pick and Andre Drummond. Detroit gets 10th pick and Kyrie Irving, Philly Gets the #1. We take Dante Exum with the pick. We get the rim protector we need and Exum. Detroit fixes their log jam in the front court and can take a pick. Philly gets wiggins
#1 for #4. #12, and Afflalo. Then package #4, #12, and Waiters for Love.
Kyrie
Afflalo
LeBron
Love
Zeller
I’ve been thinking about something like this for a few days, which I can go into multiple years on. I take the Magic’s offer for the number one, but then instead, I’d send Afflalo, Tristan, #12, and Zeller for Love and #44, and the number 4 to Chicago for #16, #19 and a conditional pick. Send Jack and Hopson (would be waived by receiving team to save money) out for #23, #25, #27 or #28. Lock Delly and Hawes up for at least 3 years, and sign LeBron and Damjan Rudez. At 16, take and stash Dario Saric, 19- T.… Read more »
So we get Affalo and Love and all we lose is the #1 overall pick and Waiters in the process?
Dude, start applying for GM jobs – you are a genius. And don’t stop with just looking for NBA GM positions. With mad skillz like you seem to have, it would translate to any sport.
Good stuff!
Oooooh, Not sure….says has even madder skillz. Not sure which one of you two I would hire first were I a professional sports team owner.
If I wanted championships every single year, one of you two is the answer!
I detect sarcasm. I see how mine would fail.
The starting assumption of my scenario is that the offer of #4, #12, and Afflalo for #1 is on the table. I personally think that is a TON for Orlando to give up, but the deal has been reported by multiple sources so I was just playing with the idea.
If you accept the hypothetical that such a deal were on the table, do you think Minnesota would take #4, #12 and Waiters for Love? We can throw in TT as well if you like.
Here’s more for Mallory’s “no-brainer” pick versus the guy seemingly no one wants…you guys are priceless…from Pelton on ESPN today: ” 1. Andrew Wiggins, Kansas Tobias Harris (98.0), Luol Deng (97.8), Maurice Harkless (97.7), Quincy Miller (97.2) There’s more star power, including Carmelo Anthony, lower in Wiggins’ top 10 comps. However, Wiggins being similar to so many players is in itself an indication he’s not a unique prospect. Paul George, the most popular subjective comparison for Wiggins, was slightly too old to qualify for Wiggins’ list after his sophomore season but had a score of just 90.0 anyway, in large… Read more »
KJ,
bro, chill. You’re starting to sound like a crazy person. We all know you don’t like Wiggins, we get it. Here in a couple days you’re either going to have to root for him or not.
Yeah, I’m crazy cuz I keep on posting articles that rely on stats and facts. Whatever. I’m posting this stuff just to mock the close-minded stupidity of people like Mallory and Cols who use asinine terms like “no-brainer” w/Wiggins. Plus, and I might be crazy for thinking this but I want all the information out there to come to light cuz some people on here might still be interested… Btw, I don’t “like” or “dislike” Wiggins. I don’t want the Cavs to draft a guy who is such a HUGE risk. His chance of being worth the number one pick… Read more »
KJ,
Out of curiosity, how did Kawhi perform in your pre-draft analysis?
You’re mistaken- The articles don’t rely on stats- they rely on people’s opinions, conjectures, and interpretations of stats…
KJ, I don’t get how you can be so nuts over Parker based on Pelton and other “experts,” and not even mention how Smart is dwarfing everyone by most analytics. How do you recon this? You should be touting Smart, not Parker by your logic.
This is an excellent point that Nate has raised several times, but I have yet to see Kj respond to it.
Nate- I’ve noticed the same thing. I think the reason KJ isn’t toutng Smart is because of Kyrie. He doesn’t fill a positional need.
However, from my own POV, because of how Smart is grading out, I would entertain a Kyrie trade that nets us Smart and some additional assets.
I’m not willing to pay for the insider stuff, so I can’t actually read the Pelton piece. None of the guys on that list there compare athletically to Wiggins. Harris had a vertical of 37.5, everyone else is below that. At 44″ Wiggins has 6.5 inches on the best of them. He has nice form on his shot, and no one is going to be able to bother it. The kid is world class. He is young and his skills have been developing and will keep developing. Both these kids (Parker and Wiggins) are fantastic prospects. What a godsend that… Read more »
You know who else had a super high vertical? Jamario Moon.
I like to see a decision two by LBJ telling the whole world that he likes to go home sweet home. The night of decision I couldn’t go sleep, I felt betray and spat on. Dan Gilbert had every right to send the email and he shouldn’t be sorry. They should take Wiggins and let the LBJ steer them to championships and parades down the 9 the street, it would be a beautiful site to see.they should sign Spencer Howe and bring Mo Williams back too, after all Moe was the only one that really cared about the Cavs and… Read more »
No hatred for Lebron here. I’d take him back. But wouldn’t you want to win something (Conference, a few playoff series) without him? It would be like taking an old girlfriend back. I’d rather move forward with my current one. What I’m saying is, if he comes back – fine. If he doesn’t – that’s fine too. Winning with him wouldn’t be as sweet, though.
Let’s be honest here: a championship with LeBron is a Cleveland sports championship and it would not be dampened in any way shape or form by his presence.
Without LeBron we are still very far from even sniffing a Conference Final.
Agreed. It doesn’t make any difference. People who say it would are lying to themselves.
If LeBron came back home and led us to championship that is an INCREDIBLE story. And would be incredibly emotional for our city. I don’t see how winning with LeBron takes away from anything. Given his history, I think it would add an order of magnitude to the broader redemption story.
Both are sweet but one is just a lot more sweet than the other. The super sweet is also really unlikely.
It would be more like taking the prodigal son back. Sure he squandered our fortunes and hung out with those prostitutes Bosh and Wade in Miami, but you’d still kill a fattened calf and welcome him back with open arms if it meant Championships for Cleveland
This was funny.
HAHAHA love it – I’ve seen the “prodigal son” analogy but you, sir, took it to a whole ‘nother level!
People in the “TAKE WIGGINS, PARKER CAN’T PLAY DEFENSE” camp; did you watch college basketball this year? Now I didn’t watch a ton but did watch 6-8 parker games and 2-4 wiggins games. Parker is a far better rebounder than any of you give him credit for. I saw him come up with some serious man rebounds. I saw Parker outmuscle ACC centers. Everytime I watched him I thought this a stronger hungrier version of Carmelo. I usually envisioned him playing the 4 but saw no reason he couldn’t guard most 3’s. He is definitely quicker than Boris Diaw. Wiggins… Read more »
Rodney mac – honest answer: “No.”
Seems like alot of that. Which bloggers did watch College basketball. Every game Duke played that I watched Parker was clearly the best player on the floor. He dominated most of the time. None of the Kansas games I watched did Wiggins seem like a lottery pick. I realized he was athletic and that he used that on defense but that was it. He seemed like a 3 and d guy. Now I realise his athleticism bodes well for the NBA. It kinda shocks me that he would be regarded this highly and be able to totally disappear in COLLEGE… Read more »
“He took 4 shots in the game they got eliminated in” scares me more than Embiid’s injury issues.
Parker should be a pretty good rebounder, hes a PF that can maybe be a SF. Wiggins is a SG that can be a SF.
What seperates them, to me, is in the clutch how much better Wiggins performed than Parker. Scroll to the bottom statistics of this … http://statsheet.com/mcb/players/compare?add=jabari-parker&chart=clutch_plus_minus&p1=andrew-wiggins
but Im just a little ol’ blogger. Either way we go we will be a better team … unless Parker really doesn’t want to be here and threw his workout because of it.
My draft strategy (version 8.1)- Draft Wiggins. If Embiid is still there at #5, offer Utah Wiggins and TT for Favors, a Hayward sign & trade, and the pick that becomes Embiid. If Utah doesn’t like it, keep Wiggins. I’ve settled on Wiggins over Parker. Parker’s weight and general apathy in his workout turned me off. We’ve already got a 3/4 tweener with defensive liabilities that likes to chow down. I still agree with KJ’s analysis that I think it’s unlikely Wiggins becomes a star, but there’s just too many flags on the other two now. If we can trade… Read more »
Grover – Can’t draft Wiggins in your scenario. Utah wants Parker. My perfect scenario would be trade down to Utah for #5, Favors, and Heyward (signed and traded). Draft Embiid. (I prefer SF Heyward over Wiggins as both a player and a fit.) Favors and Heyward alone make it worthwhile. Embiid would be icing on the cake. Would we have enough salary cap money to pay Irving, Favors, Heyward, and Varejao. I’d ask Burks to be thrown in if I couldn’t get Heyward to sign and trade. I’d throw in Jack, or Thompson. There’s also the possibility of taking Favors… Read more »
I’ve read reports that the Parker/Mormon thing is overblown, and that Utah would love to have Wiggins. I’m considering that in my scenario, right or wrong as that may be.
I wouldn’t do the same thing with Parker, because I no longe want to be stuck with Parker. Wiggins I can live with.
I like it. I still want Embiid and would prefer him over Wiggins at #1 (crazy, I know). Drafting Wiggins at 1 and dangling him over the next 3-4 picks would be great. If we could nab Favors and Embiid, I’d take that over Wiggins all day. I think Cleveland could trade for Kevin Love tomorrow if we wanted to. The #1, Waiters, Thompson, and whatever else not named Kyrie Irving would get it done. No other team can come close. However, if we can’t entice a guy like LeBron or Melo to come take a lot of money from… Read more »
I’d never give up a bunch for an unsigned love. Definitely not the first pick in the draft. I might trade Favors for him. But then, a signed 23 yr old Favors is probably better than an unsigned Love.
I don’t see why not, Gordon. What team could offer Minnesota anything better than the #1 pick? Wiggins would give them a younger franchise cornerstone to replace Love, and he would look incredible running the break with Rubio. Throw in TT and Bennett (with Love on the team we don’t need them anyway), and they have a couple more young prospects to fill Love’s hole in the lineup and add more hope for the future (with the Team Canada connection as a nice bonus for chemistry). In my estimation, the #1 plus Thompson, Bennett, and Jack (for salary matching) should… Read more »
very well put Nupe ( probably exactly how all of us bloggers feel )—–like I mentioned yesterday if you go with the safe pick ( wiggins—to a lesser degree parker ) and they are busts —then 29 other G.M,S / EXPERTS WERE WRONG ALSO——UTAH TRADE IS INTRIGUING
The great thing about having this #1 pick is that it gives us so many options. The bad thing about it, is that it’s easy to overthink things and screw it up. IMO, the ‘safest’ move would be trade the pick for the Derrick Favors ‘package’. This “gurantees” us a solid, all-star quality big rim protector that will make an impact on the team for years to come. I don’t think either the Young package or Affalo package that have been rumoured offers really gives us that guy who we “know” is going to make a difference and we’ll be… Read more »
agrre with above statement on waiters—–especially with the coaching change —–too early to make a trade that we will not be the winner / will regret later—let’s see what the new coaching staff can do with this team ( plus some key additions ) then re-evaluate —-
I’m an “assets” guy and so I’m (probably illogically) on board with trading the #1 to Philly for the #3, #10, and Noel/Young (or both). I’d also take Embiid at #3, although I know that isn’t possible now with Gilbert forcing us into “win now” mode. I’d love to take Wiggins #1. Just please, please, please, please, please don’t take Parker at #1. Please! Also, we will most likely lose any trade involving Waiters. The guy is going to blow up this season. Wasn’t he 5th in the East in scoring post-ASB? His numbers were very good in the second… Read more »
Gilbert is forcing nothing. Grant screwed up with the Mike Brown hire. It was horrible and set us back a year. But now we get the #1 pick so I’m sure they’ll do the smart thing and take Wiggins now that Embiid is damaged goods.
1) There’s a lot to choose from, but most of my favorite moments came from game four. It was game four where Spurs established that they were a much better team. After the blowout in game three, most expected Miami to bounce back like they normally do. Not this time. By the 2nd quarter, we knew that game 3 was no fluke. Miami’s bench was nowhere to be found, Spoelstra didn’t have a lineup that could carry the team, and Wade’s desperation was evident. He constantly emplored the refs for foul calls, and started flopping (unsuccessfully) on defense. The writing… Read more »
Great post, guys. It was a very enjoyable read. Keep up the good work.
one thing we ( bloggers / cavs fans )have is OUR PASSION FOR THE CAVS –it shows in the comments and it is great to be part of—–hot sauce I agree with you on LBJ—-the whole decision was handled wrong ( thru stupidity/ immaturity whatever )—let’s et over it—happens in life everyday—-it is very obvious ( look at our record since LeBron left ) that he was not surrounded by a lot of talent—think we have improved in this to possibly make it inticing to come back—-Utah/ Orlando trades would make sens—if no trades —YOU TAKE WIGGINS— everyone says how… Read more »
If the Cavs keep the #1 pick and take Wiggins.that means no Embiid or Favors. Re-signing Hawes should then become a priority (unless one concludes that Varejao and Zeller is a playoff caliber post combination).
If we go with Wiggins at #1, I’d think a center at #33 would be a priority.
If anyone thinks that Varejao and Zeller is a playoff caliber post combination they should be fired immediately.
1) YES the Ginobili dunk was awesome. It kind of made me mad that Khawi made the Sports Illustrated Cover for a missed dunk. But I know the sports world has to wildly grasp as pseudo-stars when something that doesn’t fit their narrative happens (Paul George anyone?). 2) Our identity will be uncertain until we find out if guys buy in or not. If they don’t send them packing. 3) I have been one of the biggest critic of Andrew Wiggins, I have him 4th on my personal big board (Parker is 6th BTW) He just fits so much, we… Read more »
1.Your favorite NBA finals moment was? LeBron’s pass in game two to Bosh to get the three and the victory. Just a great play and so unlike the hero ball that other players play. He’s just an unselfish great great great basketball player who does whatever is needed to win. 2. David Blatt is the new coach of the Cavs. What will the Cavaliers’ identity be? Hopefully an offense that plays to Kyrie and Waiter’s strengths while Bennett gets the starting nod at PF and Wiggins cleans up any messes. 3. Now that Joel Embiid has undergone foot surgery and… Read more »
Sorry gents, but “6 Deep” has just been upstaged by:
LEBRON-AGEDDON 2014!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
BRING IT HOME LBJ, BRING IT HOME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posts like this one are why I read this blog. Great stuff. It’s great to see the wide chasm of opinions on the draft pick. So I’m justified for being as conflicted as I am, and I’m not a complete idiot (no matter what my wife says). My message to Lebron: Don’t come back. I’ll have a hard time rooting for the Cavs with you wearing their colors again. I’m not interested in a championship if we had to pay a whore to get it. Stay in Miami. Stay with a team trying to take the easy train to championships… Read more »
This is dumb. If LeBron comes back and you don’t root for the Cavs you must be like 6 years old or something.
Go tell that to every person who had their spouse leave for a hotter ticket, then come back groveling after four years when the luster wore off, about how they wanted things back the way it was. Are they all 6 years old or something too?
Sorry if that’s beyond your understanding. Some of us have a little pride.
Wait, was LeBron sleeping with your partner?
That analogy makes no sense. You are holding a grudge because a player you liked chose a different team to play for. That seems very childish.
It is childish, but that doesn’t make the feeling any less understandable. Our organization and city gave him everything he could have ever asked for and he did us dirty. It’s not that he left it’s the Decision and that bull#$%^ arrival parade.
You have a short memory, Cols. This wasn’t like any other player. When he was drafted, he told everyone who was willing to listen, “I want to be here. I want nothing more than to bring a championship to Cleveland, and I won’t stop until I get it.” This was what Clevelanders have been waiting to hear all our lives. After getting snubbed by multitudes of stars over the years, we finally had a guy that wanted to be here just as much as we did. Or….so he said. And we all bought it hook, line and sinker. If you… Read more »
I see grover’s point. LeBron’s departure from C-town was handled incredibly poorly, and even he has acknowledged as much. So I think it is fair to have personal feelings on the issue. It was more than your average free agent departure. However, if he actually comes back, I think it would be a pretty clear statement that he truly loves NE Ohio. Everyone makes mistakes. The way LeBron handled his first decision was certainly a mistake. But if the dude wants to come back here, how does it make sense to continue to be mad at him? The very act… Read more »
My head is spinning.
If rumors are true that the Magic are offering #4, #12 and Afflalo for our #1 pick then we ought to make that trade and take Embiid or Exum with the #4 pick. Afflalo would improve the Cavs next year much more than any rookie. There ought to be plenty of players available at #12, too. I wouldn’t touch McDermott, though. He simply doesn’t have the quickness and athleticism to play defense. And i wouldn’t wait around for Saric. I’d rather have a two-way player at #12. Or, perhaps we can package a player and #12 for the Kings #8… Read more »
Ben: Your dad must have read some great books. Success tenant #3 or #4 in every book every written on winning in anything: “Don’t get bored with what works.” This is the literal translation of the “Don’t grow weary in well-doing” thing you hear from the good book. Tim Duncan embodies this philosophy, and the spurs as a team have followed suit. They were winning, for a long time, in a very boring way. The flavor of the current NBA is this amoeba style offense that happens to look sorta flashy, but still can grow repetitive (catch ball throw ball… Read more »
great comment, scotch. The Spurs don’t care how they look – they just want to win.
My message to Lebron: None of us have any idea what it means to be under your spotlight. Easy to talk shit when you aint in them shoes, so i won’t do it. But the best player in the league dippin on us, not playin 100% vs BOS… It hurt us, man…real bad. Especially us that went hard for you on the internet since you were a kid, from the time dudes was sayin Melo would be way better…to the sucka Detroit, Boston and Lakers fans talkin mad ish. Past is the past though. right now, you can’t go anywhere… Read more »
Dear T, I’m not coming back.
LeBron
“Ginobili’s dunk on Bosh. Had I been in San Antonio I would have rushed the court. Before security could get to me I’d have run up to Bosh to say “good job, good effort!” I’d do LeBron’s push-up dance as I was being hauled off. Maybe sneak an elbow to the nuts on Ray Ray in revenge for Varejao. #neverforget”
LMFAO!!! Brilliant.