The Point Four-ward: Is This The Real Kyrie Irving?

2014-12-03 Off By Robert Attenweiler

-6dab47d8d1ac2f11

Four points I’m thinking about the NBA and the Cleveland Cavaliers…

Pre-point: If you haven’t checked out David Wood’s recap of last night’s Cavs/Bucks game yet… GO. NOW.

1.) Saturday night’s game against the Indiana Pacers was my favorite Kyrie Irving game in a very long time. I, like many Cavs fans, had become a little calloused to the wiles of some of Irving’s more obvious skills on the basketball court, because — as we were reminded again and again last season — what Irving did well did not seem to translate into winning basketball. He dominated the ball. He’d pout when things got tough or didn’t go his way. He played defense so poorly most of the time that he actually became the opposing team’s sixth man on the floor on offense. There were feuds and buddy ball and a whole lotta stuff coming from Number 2 that were key factors in the grueling slog that was the #SesasonOfHuh (promotional non-sequitur: look for the e-book/paperback that is the definitive guide to all things Huh with writing by some of the most talented and beautiful Cavs bloggers around coming very soon… for serious… GET EXCITED!).

All of this made me enjoy Irving — an undeniably talented ballplayer — just a little bit of a lot less.

But, much like the Grinch of this holiday season, while watching Irving’s performance against the Pacers — and, really, most of his play during this the three game streak the Cavs capped with Saturday’s win — my heart grew two sizes that day.

He passed without dribbling! He nailed a three-pointer! He scored off the dribble, with wizoozits and trumblers!

And, of course, Irving played some very good defense against Donald Sloan. Cavs fans can only hope that this winning streak is giving them a glimpse of what Irving can become as player and, what’s more, what he wants to become.

2.) Well… then some Brandon Knight happened on a Tuesday night. The Milwaukee Bucks point guard led his team with 27 points and eight assists. Now, give credit to Knight, who is having a nice year for the better-than-expected Bucks. In his second season with the club after his original team, the Detroit Pistons, quickly cut ties with their 2011 draft pick (a draft, Cavs fans might remember, in which he competed with Irving for “best point guard available” honors”), Knight is averaging 17.5 points per game on a career best 44.3% shooting from the field and 41.2% from three. And at 6-3, Knight has the length to give Irving some problems.

Irving wasn’t the primary defender on all of Knight’s 10 field goals, but two of Knight’s three-pointers came on open looks with Irving clearly not fighting through a pick as tenaciously as he had in the past few games.

While Irving has been playing better overall D, it should be noted that, of Irving’s opponents during his defensive “awakening,” Knight was the first one who was a truly dangerous outside shooter. Many things can be said about John Wall, but that is not one of them. Same for Sloan.

So, yes, there is still some room for Irving to improve as a defender, but he’s already exceeded many people’s preseason expectations by showing that, when he’s dialed in, he can give above average effort on that end, but that effort must consistently be there. He’s not scaring anyone with his mere presence just yet.

Irving did have another great game scoring the ball on Tuesday. And, like Saturday, I was able to enjoy that.

3.) How about that Cavaliers bench, folks?

On Tuesday, Milwaukee’s bench outscored Cleveland’s by 13 (25-12). Indiana’s crew mobbed Cleveland’s line on the pine 52-16! Even Washington’s bench cleanly outperformed the wine and gold by 12 — and that was in a 26 point Cavaliers victory where David Blatt road his bench for almost the entire fourth quarter.

A big part of the bench’s production was supposed to come from Dion Waiters but, save for Mike Miller’s one-game resurrection, the problem with the bench goes beyond Waiters. Why did the Cavs lose their big first-quarter lead against the Pacers on Saturday? It’s because Lou Amundson took three shots in that quarter!

Okay, that’s not the entire reason the Cavs lost the lead, but when Amundson bunnies are the best result of your offensive sets, there’s a problem. It’s basically inviting the other team to go on a six or seven point run against you.

Blatt’s recent reliance on Amundson as a key reserve (that is, until last night when Amundson didn’t play at all) makes some sense. He’s a mobile big man who can play solid, active D and doesn’t slow the team down when it tries to push the pace as would, say, turning to Brendan Haywood. But what it really does is point out what a glaring need another big man is for this Cavs team.

The bench looks to get a shot in the arm as soon as next Monday with Matthew Dellavedova returning to action. Delly will help the reserves, for sure, but it’s unrealistic to expect him to chip in much scoring to those recent lop-sided bench numbers. So, where can the Cavs find more scoring?

Well…

Tristan Thompson works so well playing with Irving and LeBron James, but he’s not a player who can create his own shot. Anderson Varejao has become a very good offensive player. He wasn’t always but, as Jason Lloyd of the Akron Beacon Journal wrote in his post-game notes last night:

There is no doubt Varejao’s looks have been wiiiiiiide open because of the guys he’s playing with, but he’s been a consistent mid-range shooter since Byron Scott came to town and encouraged him to start shooting. If he could get that shot off playing alongside Manny Harris, Christian Eyenga and Samardo Samuels, he can get it off here.

Couldn’t agree more. It’s time to see what Thompson can do with the starters and ride a bench rotation of Dellavedova, Waiters, Miller, Varejao and (sigh) Amundson for a while. Playing with Varejao might also help wake up…

Well…

4.) I promised myself I wouldn’t pile on Dion this week… soooooo, I’ll just leave it at that.

Share