Cavs: The Duels-Does Anderson Varejao fit?
2015-07-20Editor’s Note: After noticeable debate around the CtB water cooler, we decided to take it to the mat, and offer a full on tag team rumble over Andy’s fit on the Cavs. Cory and Mallory are the Wild Thing Doubters, while David and Nate remain faithful members of the AV Club.
David Griffin’s state of the franchise press conference after the Cavaliers tumultuous 2013-14 season gave few definitives on the future. He didn’t know who would be back, including himself. “Fit” was the primary theme of his speech and having players that complemented each other was the only way the team could swim its way to a solid foundation, out of the murky waters of lottery lake. The only members of that team who are anticipated to play for the franchise two seasons later are Kyrie Irving, Tristan Thompson and Anderson Varejao. Irving broke down in the playoffs after growing defensively and as a professional during his fourth season. Thompson was the Cavs’ second most reliable player during the playoffs, and his value is still to be determined. Which leaves Andy. Varejao missed 56 games and the entire playoff run after suffering his most devastating injury to date, a ruptured achilles. Irving and Thompson are the present and future; does Varejao still fit this team?
Cory Hughey:
Lineup specific data on Anderson Varejao’s fit on last season’s team comes with the small sample size warning, primarily because he only played in a quarter of the Cavs games last season (playoffs included). The Cavs’ original starting lineup of Varejao, James, Irving, Love, and Marion yielded an unimpressive NetRtg of 3. Some of that can be attributed to the players being unfamiliar with one another, and James’s “do as I say, not as I do” mantra at the beginning of the season. The biggest mistake Griffin has made thus far, wasn’t trading away Wiggins and his cap friendly rookie scale contract for Love, but not seeing how Andy fit next to Love before extending the Wild Thing’s contract.
Updated Cavs salary picture with LeBron's deal and revised cap / max contract details. Between $225-263M. pic.twitter.com/xJKWdv5dsc
— Jacob L. Rosen (@JacobLRosen) July 9, 2015
From a luxury tax perspective, Varejao’s extension castrated the Cavs flexibility this summer. I don’t doubt that Dan Gilbert is willing to shatter the Nets luxury tax record, but if you have to spend three times as much on luxury taxes to re-sign Matthew Dellavedova as on his salary, it certainly complicates things. You can make the point that the Cavs would be in the luxury tax regardless of whether Varejao was on the team or not. LeBron, Love, Kyrie, Mozgov, Shumpert, Miller, Williams and Harris combine for $78, 805, 763 and the tax line is at $84.74 million. Thompson’s extension will push the Cavs well past the tax line alone. The tax payouts become darker the further you go into them. From $0-$4,999,999 million above the tax line, you pay $1.50 on every dollar of salary in luxury tax. The nearly $10 million Varejao will make this season will push that payout to $2.50 on every dollar spent. It would be surprising to see the Haywood trade chip turn into anything other than a trade exception, thanks to Andy’s salary.
If the tanking era Cavs and the current title or bust Cavs were ships in the night, Anderson Varejao is the dinghy that was left in the middle of the ocean after they crossed paths. Which vessel does he belong to and did poor circumstance make him not fit either? Unfortunately, the years that turned out to be Andy’s prime, were pretty much wasted seasons. I advocated trading Andy numerous times, mostly for his own good. He’s the longest tenured Cav, and I understand that people want to see him be part of the team when they win a title, but he could be one of the primary excuses we come up with if they don’t. People get sentimental for sensibility’s sake. They want the past to be part of the present. It’s hard letting go. There’s no point trading Andy now. His value is so low, the Cavs would probably have to attach a future draft pick or two just to shed his salary. His passion, deep injury history and fun hair makes him a real life mascot who makes $10 million per season.
David Wood:
You’re right, my brother-in-typing. Andy is a dinghy between the Cavs tank ship and Finals ship. There is nothing wrong with being a dinghy though. In the middle of night, a dinghy can show you how far you have come and where you need to be headed. Andy is a beautiful poofy haired reference point.
Andy needs to be looked at properly. He is no longer a guy who should be sharing the floor with any of the Big-Three for extended minutes. As Corey mentioned above, the lineup data shows that he isn’t the best fit with those guys. Mozzy worked much better. However, Andy’s power is unlocked when he gets to run the offense.
Think back to the 2013-2014 season. If Kyrie Irving or Dion Waiters were sitting, Andy would receive the ball at the top of the elbow and have a chance to survey the floor. Usually he would find a cutter, or he would take a dribble or two before handing the ball off. He made what should have been historically terrible units usable.
The Jarrett Jack, Dion Waiters, Matthew Dellavedova, Anthony Bennett, Varejao unit was +2 in just 22 minutes. The Jack, Waiters, Dellavedova, Earl Clark, Varejao unit, which was too undersized to do anything of note, didn’t drowned next to the Anderson dinghy. They put up a net rating of +6.
The 2012-2013 season is even more informative. The Jeremy Pargo, Waiters, Alonzo Gee, Tristan Thompson, Varejao group was +7 in 77 minutes on the floor together. This was Andy’s second most used lineup too. Keep in mind, this is when Dion was in full on, “I’m better than Kyrie, we’re equals, and my mid-range 2s are worth just as much as any Kyrie 3-pointer because I said so,” mode. Heck, the Pargo, Waiters, Gee, Varejao, Tyler Zeller unit put up a net rating of 0 in 13 minutes. Swapping out Zeller for Clark amounted to packing the court with bubble wrap to take up any operating space. Andy has a knack for helping terrible guys hide their terribleness for minutes at a time. The Cavs need to use the Wild thing as a Big-3 recharger this season. They could run Andy & the scrubs out for four minutes at the beginning of every fourth quarter to rest the stars. It sort of worked last season. In just four minutes of play the Dellavedova, Waiters, James Jones, Thompson, Varejao group had a net rating of 0. That’s not sinking a chance for a win.
Now, it is easy to say that my idea is great, while still snickering: “Yea, you play Andy in those Big 3-less units until he gets injured.” Guess what, maybe those are the only units he plays in. Last year Andy played 636 minutes before going down. If you cut out the freak 2013-2014 season where Andy was reasonably healthy, the Wild Thing averaged 829 minutes the previous four seasons. If the Cavs were to play him just 9 minutes a night, he would just be hitting the 900 mark after a 100 game season. He could probably survive that. And, for the people that say he may not regain his form after an achilles injury, I say “Malarky.”
There are two ways to look at Andy’s success. Andy is either sneakily athletic or really energetic. I fall in the energetic camp. Have you seen this picture of Andy:
This is a man who enjoys his malty beverages and Taco bell. Also, if he has an odd limp from his injury, his monster style running and hair might scare the crap out of people he is closing out on, even more so than normal.
Now, and this is the best argument for keeping the Wild thing, Andy can act as a blueprint for Love to become more involved. These two guys are statistically closer than most realize. Love had an assist rate of 10.7% last year and Andy’s was 9.1%. Their respective usage rates were 21.7% and 18.1%. Look at their shot charts.
Andy shot better from the mid-range area than Love, although I wouldn’t call him a better shooter.
Yet, it would benefit Love to watch Andy’s positioning on offense. The Afro-ed one grabbed 10% of all offensive boards, while Love grabbed just 6.5%, down 2% from his last year with the Timberwolves.
That might have to do with his positioning on the floor. As you can see, his last season with the Wolves he took more shots from the elbow and at the rim. Forcing Love off the three-line might force him to become a more active part of the offense. The Cavs could also run some dribble handoffs with a guy who is a threat to pop out to three or dive below for a tricky finish.
Lastly, let’s look at this from an emotional standpoint. The Andy dinghy is a reference point in more ways than one. Yes, you can look at the Wild thing and see how far the team has come. I won’t take that away from anyone. However, you can also look at Andy and see yourself. Andy isn’t the most athletic guy. He isn’t the most orthodox basketball player either. Yet, he tries. He’s turned his elbow-pointing-the-wrong-way mid-range jumper into a weapon. He finishes at angles no one else can. He has ESP with LeBron. And who do you think taught TT how to board?
As a young teen, I was oddly tall and wasn’t a natural baller. However, early on, coaches always pointed out Andy and said to just try your absolute hardest. It worked out. Andy made the offensive board something sexy for me. I wasn’t hitting 3s or driving in for smooth layups like Steve Nash, but I still could relate to an NBA player. You can’t find a guy like that just anywhere. Andy is the perfect mix of goofy and just plain old good that any NBA fan can look at him and feel like they belong in the NBA too. It doesn’t matter if his team is headed to the finals or for the number one pick. The Cavs can’t rob their fans of that feeling. It’s a rare one.
Mallory Factor:
Ah, David – everything you’ve written is excellent, well reasoned, well thought out, and totally accurate. If the year is 2012 and the Cavs didn’t already have three bigs, two of which (assuming TT gets close to what he wants) will be making WELL over 10 mil a year, and a third who could easily be making about than that in 2016.
Look, I understand the emotional side to wanting Andy around – heck, I’ve pretty much always, through my time writing for the blog, considered myself a “fan-writer” in that my approach often came from the side of a crazed fan, rather than purely logical. But it’s hard to look at everything you wrote above and feel as though the data is…uh…a bit dated.
Since 2012/2013, Andy has been a sparse part of the Cavalier’s consistent play. Missing basically two full years for ANY player would make for a long, arduous recovery – look at what poor Shump had to go through to get back to his regular self. For someone who will be 33 when the season kicks off, and will be pushing 35 when his contract finally expires, it’s nearly impossible to believe they’ll ever fully recover.
And here’s the thing – even if Andy was 29 or 30, I still don’t think he’d make sense as more than just a roster-filler, 5-10 mpg player. For all the beauty of Andy’s ability as a ball handler, the Cavs don’t really have a need for a guy through whom they have to run their offense. The idea that the Cavaliers need to rest the big three for hugely extended periods of time, and that while resting them there will be a need for substantial minutes to any big not named Tristan or Timofey is totally misguided. Finally, for however great Andy is on D and however great he is on O, his 10 mil (plus tax) isn’t worth anywhere near his production versus a guy like James Jones, at his vet minimum (side note – I am NOT arguing that Jones is better than Andy. But at about 9 million a year less? Yep, he’s a better deal).
So let’s sum it up – Yes, Andy is a favorite of many Cavs fans, and yes, he was great during the Lebron-less years. But Andy is old and coming off a MAJOR injury (after a previous years of injuries), he plays the same position as three of the most financially invested, youngest, highest upside players on the roster, and he costs an absolute ton of money. If there’s any way the Cavaliers can part ways with their beloved vet for anything of value, they should, sadly, do it in a heartbeat.
Nate Smith
Andy has been a strange outlier for his entire NBA career. In 2004, when the Cavs traded Tony Battie, and two second-rounders for Drew Gooden, Andy, and Steven Hunter (one of the best Cavs trades ever) , little did they know they’d be getting a big man who’d be on the team for 11 more season. Andy was one of the rare NBA players who kept getting better every year, until he peaked at 29 when he put up 14.1 points and 14.4 boards a night in 25 games before his season was cut short (a familiar theme). In addition, Wild Thing learned to shoot, and for the last two seasons has had one of the league’s best mid-range jump shots: 50% from 10-24 feet over the last two seasons.
That jump shot isn’t going anywhere, and as David said, Andy’s skill set meshes beautifully as a backup for Kevin Love, and as a great setup man from the high post. When Andy’s in, Kevin or Bron can go to the low post with Andy giving the high-post entry past, and guys can camp out on the corners and/or cut off the wing. There are SOOO many options with those sets, and you can never have too many guys who can pass, cut, and shoot. And Mallory, because he can actually grab a rebound, Andy is more valuable than James Freaking Jones. From a pure basketball standpoint, there’s few teams in the league who wouldn’t want Andy. He fits everywhere.
Defensively, Andy stunk at the beginning of last year, and it seemed as if his lateral quickness had left him. But, every Cav was a defensive sieve at 2014’s start. The Cavs started 19-20, and to point to Andy’s 25 games as the reason is silly. The Cavs were running defensive stalwarts, Dion Waiters and Shawn Marion at the two. Teams were dusting those guys, and K-Love, ‘Bron, and Andy were all playing hands-on-your-knees D when penetrators got to the second line.
I’m throwing any data from the beginning of last year out the window. Though, it’s not like his defense was terrible last year. His DRPM was -.57, while his ORPM was -2.23. Andy was poor – not awful – on D, and suffered from the same offensive malaise the rest of the team did. But if you go back to 2013-2014, Andy was No. 4 center in NBA in RPM, at 4.06. and 26th in the NBA, most of this predicated on his 3.59 DRPM. We’re only a little over a year removed from that kind of production.
…well, a year and one ruptured achilles. I know what you’re all thinking. I’m ignoring the elephant in the room: Varejao’s ridiculous injury history. Over the past five seasons, he’s only played over 31 games one time. But here’s the outlier thing again: Andy’s never had the same injury twice.
2010-2011: Right ankle tendon, Jan 6th, season ending. 31 Games.
2011-2012: Broken right wrist, Feb 10th, season ending. 25 Games.
2012-2013: Blood clot, Jan 21st, season ending. 25 Games.
2013-2014: Back soreness, Feb 11th-March 7th. 65 Games.
2014-2015: Ruptured left achilles, Dec. 23rd, season ending 26 Games.
This isn’t a guy who has one chronic issue. It’s just flukes coming up over and over. Of course, he has one of the NBA’s most difficult injuries to overcome, an achilles, on his dominant foot. A couple of years ago a couple of doctors from Drexel wrote a paper, “Performance Outcomes after Repair of Complete Achilles Tendon Ruptures in National Basketball Association Players,” and Kyle Wagner at Deadspin covered it.
Takeaways include these fun facts.
In the first year back from injury, players played 5.21 fewer minutes per game. That number dropped to 4.42 in the second year back. More tellingly, player efficiency rating (PER) dropped by 4.64 the first year back and 4.28 the second…
On a per 40-minute basis, “athletic” stats like blocks, rebounds, and steals actually held steady post-injury. The same is true for field goal and free throw shooting percentages…
The dropoffs showed up in any number of categories. Some players shot abysmally once they came back; for others, usage rates plummeted, suggesting they were no longer capable of creating their own offense. But taken as a whole, there was an obvious and expected drop in efficiency for nearly everyone…
In a similar article, CBS’s Chris Towers gave us a chart of former players and their post injury stats..
But here’s the thing. Andy will not be a high minutes player on this Cavs team, so the fewer minutes is no big deal, that’s got to happen. And Andy’s game was never predicated on explosive athleticism like Kobe Bryant, nor superior quickness like Chauncey Billups. If Andy’s block, rebound, and steal numbers can stay solid, there’s no reason he can’t contribute to this team, especially if his jumper stays true. The biggest place Andy will probably have trouble is finishing layups and dunks, which could be an issue. But it was reported that Andy was already warming up and running drills with the team in warmups during the late stages of the playoffs and the finals. This has to bode well.
It’s Dan Gilbert’s Money if he wants to pay, he can pay. Yes, every dollar he’s paying, counts triple or more, given the salaries the Cavs are supporting. It’s hard to Ask Cavsdan to re-sign Delly, JR, trade Brendan Haywood for someone, sign someone with the remaning mini-midlevel, and keep Andy. Here’s a little scenario of what that would look like in salary, courtesy of WFNY’s Jacob Rosen.
With just adding hypothetical J.R. Smith $7M deal, total Cavs spending increases to the $272-$316 range. pic.twitter.com/Aygjrjt8Ti
— Jacob L. Rosen (@JacobLRosen) July 9, 2015
Ultimately, if Andy’s not working out, the Cavs do have an option instead of trading him. They can offer him the stretch pay buyout, which could save the Cavs over 27-40+ million in luxury tax payments this season. Due to the way Andy’s two years and $18.9 million million in guaranteed salary is structured, and due to his non-guaranteed third year, the Cavs could offer him the stretch pay buyout, making his yearly cap hit over the next seven years $2.7 million dollars. To do this, Cleveland would have to waive Andy before August 31st this year. Otherwise, his $9.6 million dollar 2015 salary cannot be stretched. As you can see above, small changes to salaries (in this case, Matthew Dellavedova and Tristan Thompson), can cause $40 million in swings when it comes to the Cavs’ tax bill.
But I don’t want to see Andy released. His injuries are like a bad run in poker. Just because you lost four of the last five hands, doesn’t mean you played them wrong or you made bad decisions. Sometimes you have bad luck, and sometimes it comes in clusters. Correlation is not causality.
I’ve never been one that just roots for laundry. I love this Cavs team for the players. I don’t love the players just because they’re on the Cavs (*casts sidelong look at Joe Harris*). Anderson Vaarejao deserves a shot at a ring more than some schmuck the Cavs could get with Brendan Haywood’s contract. Andy bleeds Wine and Gold and will have his number retired in the Q some day. Sure, if Cleveland released him, they could bring him back as an assistant, but Andy has more pride than that. He’d go sign somewhere else first. It would pain me to see Andy playing against Cleveland in another uniform. And I don’t think it would make the guy who’s running the Cavs – LeBron James – very happy, either. Which is why it won’t happen.
If AV is healthy, he’s going to be great for us. I can’t believe the flack he’s getting. Like anyone else was doing well with our disastrous chemistry issues early in the season?
The guy is a great pick ‘n pop player and hustles. At this point, playing him 10 MPG, letting him shoot open 12 footers, and letting him play defense and grab rebounds . . . he’s going to contribute.
Put up a piece on RJ. I was skeptical, but after digging into him. He was decent last year. Good signing.
Agreed. I don’t understand the negativity for a guy signed at the vet min. He’s shot 40% from 3 in 4 out of the past 5 years. He’s going to play less than 10 MPG.
If Kyrie/Kevin lineups can swing to RJ for a couple open threes a game, what’s there not to like?
Type in “why does everyone dislike Richard Jefferson” on reddit…
I AM O K WITH THE JEFFERSON SIGNING / PRICE IS RIGHT ( CAVS ARE SOMEWHAT HANDCUFFED MONEY WISE ) IS A ” YOUNGER ” 35 THAN THE MATRIX ( HIS ATHLETICISM IS SOMEWHAT STILL THERE ) HAS IMPROVED ON HIS OUTSIDE SHOT ( SOMETHING THAT MATRIX DIDN’T BRING AT ALL )—- ALL WE ARE LOOKING FOR IS 7 T0 10 PRODUCTIVE MINUTES / GAME —-GOOD LOCKERROOM PRESENCE ——YES WRIGHT WOULD HAVE BEEN BETER BUT $’S MAY NOT HAVE ADDED UP / ALLOWED THEM TO DO ——JUST WATCHED A HIGHLIGHT OF R.J. LAST YEAR ” SKYING ” PRETTY DAMN GOOD… Read more »
Yep. He’s better than Delly, that’s for sure. There are no downsides to this signing.
He doesn’t play Delly’s position. I’d rather have J.R. We already have James Jones. If he’s better than James Jones, then good signing. If he’s not, then what’s the point? Does this mean we can cut Mike Miller?
Nope. We are keeping James Jones and Miller and adding Jefferson in the Shawn Marion spot. He can shoot and is more athletic so he should be quite a bit better than Marion.
Marion is ten times the defender Jefferson is.
There is only one person in the world would pick him ahead of Delly. BTW, Ohioian, think about Cols before you vote if the legalize pot measure is on the ballet next election.
He will get more minutes in the playoffs next year than Delly now that we have a real backup PG in Mo. That being said he won’t play much in the playoffs.
Remember, when the Cavs were healthy and annihilating the Celtics Delly played a total of 10 minutes for the series.
Production-wise, Marion had a better “previous year before joining Cavs with Dallas.” Marion – 31.7 m/g , .446 fg%, 10.4 ppg, 6.5 reb/g, 1.6 assists/game, .5 block/g, 1.25 steal/g R-J 16.8 m/g, .444 fg%, 5.8 ppg, 2.5 reb/g, 1.6 assists/game, .2 block/g, .70 steal/g So we’re paying for an upgrade in 3 point shooting. Isn’t he supposed to play without LeBron? Is he gonna be able to get his own shot? I haven’t seen too many of those plays recently. Sure he looks better or ‘younger” than Matrix did. He’ll be here for one year, won’t produce much, and in… Read more »
While Cols is no doubt trolling pretty hard, the sad truth is that he’s probably right that Andy is done. That extension was indefensible unless and only unless LBJ told them the extension was a condition precedent to him signing. Andy has lost his lateral quickness, which totally kills all the things he’s good at excepting only his now silky midrange jumper. His ability to get into position for rebounds, taking charges, switching, and help D are all screwed with his loss of step, particularly coming back from another injury at age 30-whatever. It is quite possible he is Haywood… Read more »
Yes. I agree with all of this. Except I don’t think his career was great.
Richard Jefferson is a great signing. As long as he doesn’t suffer a Miller type of cliff he’ll be a good backup for us.
A 10 year career as a professional athlete playing meaningful minutes and games in the NBA is a great career. Its not a hall of fame career. But its a great career. He played at a very high level on the biggest stage in professional basketball. He made himself tens of millions of dollars. He is in the top .000001% of people who ever tried to play the game.
Stop being mean, it just weakens your analysis. Anyone can bluster black and white platitudes. Intelligent people recognize subtlety and degree.
OK OK.
I just don’t understand why people like Andy so much. He hasn’t played well or even played in years. It seems to be all misplaced nostalgia.
See above. Andy was fantastic in FIBA last year,. Did he suddenly get drastically worse in two months, or did he suffer from the same malaise the rest of the Cavs did?
The problem with that, Nate, is that I’ve never known Varejao to suffer from malaise. Maybe he was learning to play with the guys, sure. But realistically, he’s going to be slower than he was last year, and the year before that. He’s coming off a serious injury – multiple serious injuries. He’s never been graceful or athletic – his body takes a beating in part because of the strain of his akward movements. His posture even stinks. I mean, I love the guy. Truly love him and everything he does, but realistically? He’s probably just about done. He’s smart,… Read more »
Another curveball in Mavs’ offseason: Hearing that vet swingman Richard Jefferson, thought to be staying in Dallas, now signing with Cavs
Marc Stein on Twitter
Really? I don’t get this move…
I guess they think he’s a guy that can spell LeBron for 10-15 minutes in a night at the wing? Vet minimum? I guess it’s not a wild deal, but I’m kind of with you on that EG. Doesn’t seem to fit the plan of 26-29 year olds or whatever they said. Is he going to turn into the Matrix: Reloaded?
It really does seem like The Matrix: Reloaded… He’s 35, a Mavs castoff SF, and I just can’t see him playing meaningful minutes for this team. Certainly goes against bringing in younger guys to compete. Would much rather have had a Dorrell Wright or even Rasual Butler…
Rasual is actually 36 years old lol, just looked that up. And Wright’s jumper is awkward looking, not sure how reliable it is. RJ is fine, I think he still has more in the tank compared to Marion.
Good point on Butler. Didn’t realize he was that old. Maybe it just seemed like he contributed more on last year’s Wiz team than I remember Jefferson doing for the Mavs.
I’ve also never been all that big of a RJ fan (even back in the NJ days). That’s probably coloring my mood on this move. I guess it doesn’t really matter since it’s just a 5-10 minute per game placeholder for LBJ…
This is a great signing. This team needs vets who can play. Yeah, Marion didn’t work out, but Jefferson looked good last year and is a good backup.
No crappy rookies for this team.
You make no sense Cols… Andy has nothing left in the tank, but a 35 year old RJ does? Laughable…
Evil, you are trying to reason with Cols. That is like pushing a garbage truck up a hill.
Ya, I’m not sure what happened to the looking for younger players motto. The only two new guys we’ve signed are mo and pending jefferson? Maybe it’s so they can offer more to our own guys to cut some of the tax spending down? I have no idea, I’m just making stuff up at this point.
Makes sense if you want to bring a guy in for 5 min a night.
I think it works, he has better luck putting the ball in the hoop than our current bench players. Could be a solid back up SF.
You mean except for Mo Williams… right?
Oh and JR (assuming he resigns)? Both score better than RJ.
Yes, “current” being the ones from this past season. Mo could have saved Delly from cramping and actually hit a jumper or two this past June, and who knows from there…. ;)
42.6% from three was Jefferson this past season.
And he can still do this. I’d say he’s got more in the tank than Marion did.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fBKofQo5OcA
17 minutes/game last year, down from 27 the year before. Shot/made half as many threes as the year before (shot only 2.1 3’s per game last year, and made less than 1 @ .9/game). 5.8 pts, 2.5 rebounds, 0.8 assts/game. Shot less than 30% from 3-10 feet last year, and a cool 7.7% from 10-16.
Color me unimpressed.
I’d much prefer a “crappy rookie” with some future upside, or a younger player like Wright with some upside.
Looks like David Griffin is going to take the Red Pill and go back into the Matrix
https://youtu.be/OYdOmZ6Z1Ac
Marion still had some in the tank too… in April 2015. One play is not much.
Pretty sure a guy named Parsons is the reason RJs minutes were down.
In fact I would think his avgs stay the same. 10 MPG or less most nights. Starts on the days Lebron is out. Played decent in extended minutes. His 3 never went away. Fine with this on a vet min.
I just can’t see his already weak averages staying the same when put on a team with more talent and losing 41% of his playing time (from 17 to 10 minutes/game).
So did they accidentally think he was James Jones or do they actually want to have two JFJs on the team.
Asked if he regretted his decision to decline his contract option, Smith said “Uh, I mean, yes and no.
“No because I’ve gotten offers that I wanted, I mean numbers that I wanted, it’s just different situations,” Smith said. “Right now it’s just a matter of seeing what the Cavs come back to me with. Right now they give me the best opportunity to win.”
http://basketball.realgm.com/wiretap/238821/JR-Smith-To-Meet-With-Cavs-Somewhat-Regrets-Opt-Out-Decision
Andy keeps himself in great shape. That picture is very misleading. He isn’t a particularly muscular player, but he entered last season in great condition. Part of what got him in such great shape was his World Cup training. Andy played very well throughout and didn’t look anything like a player on the decline. Obviously, if Andy can’t stay healthy, the price of his contract will be a bit annoying for Gilbert. BUT, if he can play at 90% of what he did pre-injury, the contract is not in anyway absurd. People have never truly appreciated the intricacies of Andy’s… Read more »
He cannot play. Why does everyone always hold out hope that Andy will play? He always gets injured around game 30. And he was pretty horrible before his injury this past year.
Ugh. Cut him already and get someone useful in there.
You do know that cutting him will not put them below the tax line, and hence they won’t be able to “get someone useful in there.” If Dan is willing to pay his $10MM this year, so be it. I’d be happy with 10-15 minutes of Andy off the bench. He’s been a fine player. We’re not relying on him to do a ton, so if he gets hurt, so what? Do you think someone would trade “someone useful” for him? Nope. So pretty much cutting him just saves CavsDan $$$. Guess you’re really worried about his pockets.
Sounds like you just want to piss off LeBron.
I’m curious as to which “someone useful” you’re referring to, Cols… Besides the Joe Johnson trade (which sounds dead) who exactly do you envision the Cavs replacing AV with that makes a big difference?
A piece of chocolate cake? A giant bag of Doritos. Both more useful than Andy has been for the past 5 years.
So, that’s the best you have? Cake and Doritos? About what I expected…
What do you have against Doritos and cake?
I’d love it if we could cut all trolls. But I also think the Cavs strategically sat Andy… he was out what – 60 games with a sprained ankle? Seriously. That was strategic.
Any particular reason we didn’t go after Amar’e – he signed for the veteran minimum. Seems like he’d be a great fit for 20 minutes with the second unit.
He’s a PF and the Cavs already have three of those. Also, he’s from Florida and reportedly wanted to go home which is why he signed for the vet minimum.
Sometimes, just have day dreams of what it would be like for 2008/2009 Lebron to have a supporting cast like he does now…….
Wait a minute here. http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/v/varejan01/lineups/2014/ 2013/2014 it 5 4,3-player lineups that involved the 3 musketeers of Delly, Andy, Dion were productive +39, +30 and +23 pts respectively. So much, we were enjoying seeing the bench play more than the starters that season. Andy will be productive again with Delly and I bet with JR. Of course it will be short lived again because HE WILL get injured again. Please just don’t let him play against Grizzlies against Gasol. I swear this is where it all starts every year when he plays out of his mind and abuses his body.
If they want him ready for the playoffs just hold him out until April. They can have the best record in the East without him.
If Andy was a free agent what would he fetch? Mini mid-level? Vet minuimum?
I was thinking around 5 mill pre injury.
I wonder if the Mavs will send a contingent to boo them…
Last I checked Clippers were still 13-1 to win the title. Definitely my favorite odds out of any of the five teams or so who could do it. Memphis is intriguing too.
http://espn.go.com/nba/story/_/id/13269490/the-phil-files-part-4-trade-shook-new-york The Phil stuff is really good, and I don’t think he ripped Shump or J.R. that badly or told us anything we didn’t already know. I mean JR is a headcase and has been most of his career. If his head’s on right, he’s great. If not, it’s a mess. He acknowledged Shump’s talent more than once, but that he wasn’t a great fit, nor did he know why he was slumping (the latter is a problem shump still has). I always forget how sharp and introspective Phil is. And to be honest, that Knicks team he inherited was… Read more »
I second that Porzingis is gonna be a stud and he might be pulling some evil Zen mind tricks to make Melo waive his no trade clause.
Watch him sucker Jim into giving him DeAngelo Russell and Julius Randle for Melo.
Randle is a tough guy to pair in the front court with his lack of range and inability to protect the paint. He’d fit with Porzingis.
HAHA. I don’t think he’s going to be all that good. I was more throwing out names. Mortgaging the future for Melo seems like a Jimmy Buss move.
I like Porzingis. If he reaches half of his potential he’s gonna be great. Melo trade is very Lakers.
Melo and Kobe need to play together. C’mon Knicks and Lakers – set aside your differences, and let’s do what’s best for humanity.
Maybe I’m just feeling contrarian today, but after watching a bit of Porzingis in Summer League, I still think he’s got a lot more potential to wind up being more of a Bargniani than a Dirk. He won’t be a miss like Darko… but I’m not buying the hype (at least not yet). And I respectfully disagree about Phil. I think he bit off more than he could chew with the Knicks job, and in many ways the game has passed him by (as witnessed by his erratic twitter rants throughout last season). I don’t think he makes it to… Read more »
I watched a bit of Zingis in summer league. So hard to tell with someone that young. The Knicks need to play him, even if he sucks this year, as is likely. I’d never say any 19 year old is the next Dirk, or whoever, but, man, so tall with skills…just really raw right now.
Agree that he’s very unlikely to be a Darko like bust. Will be interesting to watch his development.
Oh Jackson’s timing is suspect as JR is trying to get signed by someone . I really don’t care. Did anyone really believe he would have no response to JR’s shots towards him when he was with Cavs? He has an ego too. Yes he was honest about him not carrying the load, being late ect. BUT That part about him getting ready to cry?? That was a direct shot. HE didn’t have to say that. This is what some people are talking about throwing some shade. Again, I could care less. It works out for Cavs to get him… Read more »
I agree with you Nate about the Phil Jackson article. It’s been perceived by some press/commentators that Jackson was throwing them under the bus, but I saw it as Jackson telling the truth. It didn’t seem like he was trying to badmouth them… he sounded like a typical boss trying to explain why they let go an employee(s). Whoever thought Phil was being offensive must have thin skin. I would agree with EG on Porzingis in that I think it’s more likely he’s not worth the 4th pick. Although, his defense on Okafor in summer league was admirable. I think… Read more »
Phil is a DBAG. Maybe he has to be to be upper management in the NBA. I’m sure they all are but not in the open. Phil’s tweets and interviews are unzen as anything could be. Part of the job is PR and he is failing at it. He tore on JR. Mocked him to the interviewer. When JR broke down and told him the truth he cut him loose. Same with Shump. Asked him about his game and when the guy couldn’t self-diagnose his on-court problems (isn’t that a staff thing?) he got rid of him. But kept Hardaway… Read more »
He asked Fish for his biggest distractions, and he moved them. I didn’t see anything particularly malicious. Most of it was just the salary.
More the way he handled the interview. I don’t think you’d see most GMs color it that way.
“At best, the Knicks would get the first pick and tab center Jahlil Okafor, although Jackson thinks he might not be aggressive enough. “Also, if you look at the guys who came to the NBA from Duke, aside from Grant Hill, which ones lived up to expectations?”‘ So Duke hasn’t produced anyone other than Grant Hill, so he decided to go to the talent-overflowing pool of Latvia for Porzingis… ok. Phil is just full of it. He’s got 20-20 hindsight in the deal with Shumpert. The “quotes” he used when he mentions talking with Shump, Hardaway, and JR are loaded.… Read more »
Andy’s defensive statistics are misleading.
There is no stat for leaving your man alone in order to cover for a guard who is badly beaten off the dribble.
That has happened constantly in Cleveland since Andy has been here.
He is the most underrated Cav in history, and he was an excellent player who improved annually until his body quit.
Buy him out, and sign him as an assistant coach.
He’s taken too many falls.
Great young man.
Keep Andy.
Drop Haywood for trade exception.
Sign TT 4yr/60mil. Sign J.R. 2 yr/14mil. Sign Delly 3 yr/10mil. Sign JFJ for Vet min 1.5mil.
Add Rasual Butler, UFA from Wizards.
Let’s go 2015-2016, back to finals to face off against the winner of the bludgeoning Western Conference playoffs.
If Andy is pulling down $10 million a year for 5-10 minutes a night, we probably shouldn’t scoff at Tristan deserving $15 million.
More than a little of that $10M is for past services though… sort of a mini-Kobe deal. Not saying I was in favor of him getting it, but let’s call it what it is…
Or one hell of a severance check. The guy will have been paid $80 million for working 45% of his games and he probably has been with a harem of ladies that could rival Genghis Khan. I can’t feel bad for Andy even if his contract was stretched and he was released.
But, he was also often the only guy trying for four years on a lottery team… I agree with you that he probably should have been traded (for his own good) years ago, but now there seems to be no way (or reason) to move him. Also, the stretch buyout doesn’t really help do anything except save CavsDan some tax money, and put LeBron in a bad mood ;)
Brought this up on one of Nate’s comments, but I can’t see LeBron vetoing a deal that makes the team better even if involved trading Andy. He wants more rings for his legacy and is the most obsessed star with his legacy ever. So many of his responses seem premeditated as if he wants them to be there for his career retrospective.
And I responded above, but will repeat it here… if that’s true, then why did LBJ get so bent when Mickey Arison cut Mike Miller to save some money? If it was with regard to one of his primary contributors, then sure, LBJ gets a little more shrewd… but when it comes to role players, LBJ wants what he wants and has gone out of his way to say that Andy is maybe one of his favorite players he’s ever played with…
The only defense I’ll proffer is that they gave away Miller for nothing but savings. If they traded Andy, and it was an upgrade, the argument could be made that LeBron would be more onboard with it. Just playing devil’s advocate here.
And I’m not disagreeing that a move (like the rumored Joe Johnson deal) that brings either another starter or valuable sixth man off the bench (in other words a primary contributor) would probably be okay with LBJ. But if it’s just a stretch buy out to save CavsDan from paying more luxury tax… LBJ ain’t gonna be on board…
COUNT ME IN ON PURSUING WRIGHT / BELIEVE HE WOULD BE THE IDEAL PICK UP ( SKILL /MONETARY WISE ) FOR THE CAVS —-ALSO READ SOMEWHERE ( RANT SPORT / REAL GM ) THAT MO WILLIAMS WAS CONSIDERED THE TOP PT GD FREE AGENT THIS SUMMER —HE DID AVG 17.5 AND I BELIEVE 5 ASST’S / GAME —I WILL TAKE THOSE NUMBERS FOR A BACK UP PT GD WHO IS ALSO A GREAT LOCKERROOM GUY WITH VETERAN PRESENCE ——THOUGHT I SAW ALOT OF RAW ATHLETICISM FROM CHRISTMAS IN THE SUMMER LEAGUE / MIGHT BE ALOT OF ” ROAD TRIPS ”… Read more »
Great choice of topic, gentlemen. To me, there were 2 important points made in the article. First, I agree with whomever said that AV’s trade value is minimal at this point. Given that the Joe Johnson deal couldn’t get done, which would seem to be a no-brainer for the Nets if they’re trying to shed tax/salary, I think speaks to the lack of value AV has right now. Secondly, I am wary that AV’s particular injury will heal in such a way that will make him an effective contributor at his age. Plus, I just don’t want the Cavs to… Read more »
No he can’t be combined with a trade exception. Exceptions cannot be combined with players or other exceptions.
Thanks for the info, Nate!
Great stuff guys. I’m in the camp that thinks Andy can still contribute. He’s still a better fourth big man than most others out there. Here’s hoping that less usage will result in greater physical health this season. Also, I think Nate is accurate in saying that nobody making decisions (CavsDan, LBJ or Griff) are looking to unload AV (otherwise they likely would have done so when they were rumored to have a chance to package him with the Haywood contract for Joe Johnson).
This: “Varejao deserves a shot at a ring more than some schmuck the Cavs could get with Brendan Haywood’s contract. Andy bleeds Wine and Gold and will have his number retired in the Q some day.”
A very human touch in a world of robotically maximizing wins/profits at at all costs.
And no, Andy doesn’t deserve a shot at a ring any more than whoever else we pick up. The dude has been injured or ineffective for quite a while now. He got his money. Give someone else a chance.
This from the guy who said, “do whatever the king wants.” Well, the King wants Andy.
The irony runs thick…. HAHAHA! Well played, Nate!
LeBron ditched his banana boat BFF Wade probably over his unreliability with injuries. I don’t think LeBron vetoes a deal that could return a meaningful contributor just because Andy is Andy. LeBron is all about LeBron, first and foremost. There’s never been a star more obsessed with his legacy than LeBron.
If that’s true… then why did he get all bent at Mickey Arison when he dumped a fairly useless Mike Miller for tax purposes? LBJ wants his guys, even if he’s the only one who sees their value…
Agree that tax purposes was an issue in Miami, but it was also after he, Wade and Bosh took discounts and then they cut Miller. LeBron is squeezing every last drop out this time around (as is his right). Andy just retiring when he’s injured again next season is probably the best case scenario for all involved. He could no longer be a burden on the cap and still get his money with a cushy front office job.
I don’t disagree with that scenario (should it come to pass) of AV getting injured yet again and retiring into a job with the team. But that’s not going to happen prior to August 31, so the stretch buyout wouldn’t be an option until next year (I think), and by then the cap will be higher and he’ll have less of an impact on it. I just don’t see any other options out there that are all that interesting for the Cavs to entertain, do you? I would have been okay with the Andy and Haywood package for Joe Johnson… Read more »
I agree, EG… I thought the best outcome for the BHC + AV was Joe Johnson. I was also lukewarm on the deal because of his age, but he fulfilled a need for a scorer… and would’ve costed a dead weight player and an injured player.
Outside of the that deal, it looks like the best case scenario is that AV fulfills a nice bench role for the 2nd unit.
I didn’t mind the Joe Johnson deal at all. He’s obscenely overpaid, but could have an ideal fourth guy who can facilitate and play multiple positions.
He is obscenely overpaid, but I don’t even hold that against him at all. In fact, I guess that’s where most of the negativity comes from with respect to him, and I think it’s unfair. To me, the owners/GMs are to blame if they mis-value a player. I say all of this knowing you aren’t being critical Cory… I’m saying all this as a response to my observation of those who disregard him as a player. The most surprising thing about him to me is that he’s a pretty good 3pt shooter. I vaguely remember him being a great shooter… Read more »
Agree Johnson would be a better fit on this team than Andy.
David, it’s spelled dinghy, not dingy. Dingy is an entirely different word.
You got me. I’m blaming Corey for the first misspelling. He’s older, so he has to be a better role model for my spelling chops.
My spelling, and the ability to fold clothes properly were destroyed years ago by alcohol.
Then you went and misspelled “Corey” in your response… Geez DW, are you okay? ;)
It’s rarely brought up, but the world is going to run out of ink someday because of unnecessary letters.
Some of my least favorite unnecessary letter words:
Receipt, corps, depot, mnemonic, colonel, phlegm and anything that ends with an extraneous “b” like dumb, numb, thumb, crumb…
The best word ever is “rhythm.” It has one unnecessary letter, but it makes up for it by removing as many vowels as possible.
Yeah, I went to Cedar Point with a girl named Haleigh. She was complaining that people always misspell her name and I told her she needs to blame her parents.
At least they didn’t name her Felony…
http://www.mommyish.com/2014/04/24/felony-baby-name/
Ranked 189 of 743 names in North Dakota…
Lawd. Naming a person would be tough. I’ve contemplated writing a baby name book where I make fun of every name in it.
Pretty much any word that sounds like it starts with “n,” but then is actually “g” or “p.” Gnat….. Come on. Pneumonia… Gimme a break.
Varejao has to have slipped defensively. His value on that end of the court was in his hustle and his lateral quickness. It made him brilliant in the PnR blitz schemes that are now outdated in this place and space era. He was never a great iso defender. But keeping him in a limited role off the bench would limit that slippage. Especially if we put him with Delly, who is good at staying in front of guys and at worst, pushing his man into help. His offensive skills are things that won’t degrade. They’re the same things that made… Read more »
I assume Dorrell Wright fits on that bottom salary cap chart under “rest of MLE.” Dorrell posted a solid RPM for a bench player of .27(27th rank, 67th percentile for small forwards, 142nd ranked 70th percentile overall). He did suffer from the ignominious distinction of finishing with a FG% lower than his 3Pt% (37.9% vs 38.0%), but at 29, his career 42% field goal percentage and 36.5 3Pt% suggest this could be remedied and that he’s a competent three point shooter. He’d be a perfect fill-in for James for 13 minutes a night and a spot start or three, and… Read more »
You may have sold me on Wright with your comparisons, Nate… Much rather have Wright than Prince, that’s a no brainer to me. Probably would take Wright over Tucker… even though I like Tucker’s toughness… that’s a tough call.
ALOT OF GOOD PTS / OPINIONS —–AM LEANING TOWARDS ANDY BEING AN ASSETT TO THE TEAM —–THE CAVS WERE STILL ” FIGURING ” IT OUT BEFORE ANDY GOT HURT —-WE DON’T KNOW HOW HE WOULD PERFORM FOR A WHOLE YEAR WITH THIS GROUP ( AM EXCITED TO SEE THIS ) –ALSO HE ONLY NEEDS TO GIVE US 15 MINUTES ( OR SO ) A GAME —-DON’T FORGET THAT ” HOOK SHOT ” THAT HE ALSO ADDED TO HIS ARSENAL LAST YEAR —-BIGGEST CONCERN OF COURSE IS HIS HEALTH—IF HE CAN STAY HEALTHY I THINK HE HELPS THE CAVS PUT UP… Read more »
On a podcast or two back the subject of what David West does better than Andy came up. You can make a case for each guy in different respects, but West stays on the court better and it’s not close. Andy might not have a chronic issue, but he’s definitely injury prone. I don’t know what the solution is. Give him 10 minutes a night and no back to backs? Just wrap him in bubble wrap and don’t let him play until April?
+1 to the bubble wrap idea. Let’s keep him in the package til the team is old enough to play with him without breaking him.
I think he’s done. And good riddance too.
Why “good riddance”? What has Andy ever done besides give everything he has to the Cavs? It’s not like he tried to get injured, or has ever been a bad guy. When he’s healthy, he makes a difference…
Forget it, EG, it’s Colstown.
True… although I don’t take any issue with the first part of Cols’ comment. I totally respect the opinions of those who think Andy has nothing left. I hope he proves them wrong, but can see the reasoning why given his age and litany of injuries.
To say “good riddance” should be reserved for guys who are cancers on teams or don’t try or want to be there…
See: Dion Waiters
Like guys who sign contracts in restricted free agency with other teams?
I don’t know if I’d even put Dion in those categories. Dion wanted to be here when he was here, and he did try hard for the most part. Maybe his competitiveness with Kyrie led to him being a minor cancer, but not on par with say a Ty Lawson.
Still, you’re right, Dion would be a more understandable guy to say “good riddance” about than Andy…
Yeah… like I often said “good riddance” about Carlos Boozer back in the day…
Yeah, I think he is likely done as a legit NBA player, too, the other part of the comment was colsian and unnecessary.
First, I think the Cavs strategically sat Varejao some of those seasons. I think he could have come back (like from the ankle injury) but the Cavs chose to sit him so that they could get better draft picks. Plus, this might mean there’s less mileage on his legs. Second, I know this was a major injury; on the plus side, Varejao was doing better and better each year; his shot was getting better; and I’d like to give him the benefit of the doubt. I’m not ready to write him off until after we see him play 40 games.… Read more »