The Point Four-ward: Loves to Pass
2016-01-06Four points I’m thinking about the Cleveland Cavaliers…
1.) The Cavs needed a win like the one they got Monday night at The Q.
For all of the talent accumulated on the Cleveland roster by GM David Griffin… for all of the increased comfort felt by head coach David Blatt and LeBron James, both enjoying much smoother second seasons on the shores of Lake Erie… for all of the “just mark ’em down for the Finals” sentiments floating around out there, for much of the season so far, the 2015-16 Cleveland Cavaliers hadn’t seemed all that dominant.
There’s no faulting their record of 23-9. That’s good for tops in the Eastern Conference and a much better spot than they were in a year ago, when they dropped to 19-16 with a January 5 loss to the 76ers in Philadelphia in a game that was played without James (back injection / Miami trip) and Dion Waiters (traded at game time). Still, these Cavs have often seemed like something less than a powerhouse. They’ve played down to the poorer competition. They’ve fought back against stiffer competition.
They’ve won… they’ve just made it look difficult.
That’s why their 122-100 victory over the visiting Toronto Raptors is such a big confidence booster. The Cavs welcomed one of the East’s top teams into their building… and then handed it to them. Kyrie Irving was Kyrie Irving again, James was able to take the fourth quarter off, Love and Tristan Thompson dominated the glass with 14 points a piece and 20 boards between them. Even J.R. Smith got some of his “Swish” back, going for 24 points on 8-14 from three.
The Cavs just flat-out clicked.
2.) But, really, this is a team that’s been doing a much better job locating its swagger over the last three weeks of the season. All but one of the team’s victories of 20 or more points has come since December 11. They have beaten the Orlando Magic twice, by 35 points and then 25, the Sixers by 22 and now the Raptors, also by 22. Put another way, four out of the 11 games they’ve played in that span (or 36%) have been victories of 20 points or more. Compare that with a six point loss at Golden State to the team with the best record in the league and then… well, that Portland game did happen. But slowly this team has started putting some distance between themselves and, at least, the teams they should be beating, as well as some — like the Raptors — who put up a good fight.
On the heels of all this good feeling, though, comes a truly tough test as the Cavs embark on a two week road trip, which will include games against the Wizards, Mavericks, Rockets and Spurs. This is when the Cavs figure out how far they’ve come this season and how much work they may still have to do.
3.) There was an interesting article about Kevin Love — or, more accurately, about Kevin Love’s outlet passes — in the New York Times last week. In it, Scott Cacciola delves into the history and development of the move and its line of decent from Wes Unseld, the former Washington Bullet center, to the Cavs current power forward. The connection between Unseld and Love is not new; practically every article that talks about Love’s passing brings up Unseld as the outlet’s perfector, if not its progenator. But two things about this article that really stood out:
First, was the fact that Love could throw a perfect outlet pass long before he even knew how to shoot a basketball. Love’s father Stan, a teammate of Unseld’s in Washington, used to tape targets on walls so that young Kevin could fine-tune the two-handed hoists from his chest. Love focused so much on chest passes, in fact, that he shot the ball with two hands, just like if he were delivering a pass, until he was 10 or 11 years old.
Second, was Unseld’s insinuation that there are players who could be outstanding outlet passers, but they don’t look to ignite the break off a rebound with regularity because it takes away from that player’s ability to score.
“They could if they wanted to, ” Unseld said. “[T]hey had as much ability and strength and knowledge that I had. But the difference is, when you throw that outlet pass, you’re not going to get the ball back. So they would rebound the ball and they would hold it, give it to a guard to dribble it up, and then post up and get the ball back so they could score. It just depends on how you look at the game.”
In Unseld’s mind, the player who throws the outlet pass is unselfish and doesn’t care about his own scoring stats… but Love cares. Everyone knows that Love cares.
While no one has ever called the Cavs’ power forward “selfish,” he obviously cares about his touches on offense. He cares so much about that end of the floor that LeBron James made a point to laud Love as the team’s offensive “focal point,” largely in response to concerns — from Love and others — that the 6-10 UCLA big man wasn’t being utilized properly in his first season in the wine and gold.
Legendary coach John Wooden actually talked about Love’s balance of passing and scoring stats all the way back in college. Here’s what Wooden said:
4.) How much Love cares is going to be tested. With Kyrie Irving rounding back into form, Love’s status as nominal “focal point” of the offense looks to be in jeopardy. In the eight games since Irving’s return from off-season knee surgery (and his six games played), Love has averaged just 13 points a game on 41% shooting from the floor.
On the other hand, Love’s rebounding numbers have stayed strong and, if you exclude the unmitigated disaster that was the team’s loss in Portland, he has averaged a +12 in that same span. So, both he and the Cavs are finding ways to have a positive impact when he is on the floor. Right now, it’s just not a result of his shot.
For the season, Love is averaging 16.4 points, 10.7 rebounds and 2.5 assists.
Extra Credit: Here’s a video tribute to Unseld, featuring many of his signature pin-point outlet passes.
Great stuff Robert! I for one still think there will be enough shots to go around, and Love seems a lot more comfortable this year…
Cavs are going to kill the wizards tonight. Just sayin.
Guys let’s consider how awesome they have been since game 1 this year. I counted 12 different starting lineups and may have missed some. They have started 4 different PG’s. They have started 3 SG’s and none of them were Shump. They have started 2 Centers and 2 SF’s (even if it was just one game) yet they are clearly one of the 3 best teams (Stop with the OKC nonsense).
Can someone do an post on Love’s defense. To my eyes it’s been nothing short of good this year. I mean above average not just good for him. He usually has excellent position and makes the right decision in pick and rolls. Not great in the post once he’s given up position and the player has the ball but pretty good a preventing the entry. He’s stepped up his rim protection from bad to maybe average. And his numbers are pretty solid despite the fact that he hasn’t played tons of minutes with Tristan compared to some other guys
I think your eyes are correct, he looks to be in good position for the most part. Every once in a while he doesn’t put his arms up, but nothing like last year. He is at a disadvantage with some of the quicker PF, like Draymond Green, for example, but overall he’s been pretty good.
Because of injuries we probably have not seen the ceiling of this Cavs team yet. The game against the Raptors probably came the closest because it was the first time KI really had shaken the rust off. Fair to say that the best is yet to come!
Glad to see the recent blowouts (Portland excepted) but I think the play has been pretty great all things considered. They still have the 4th best point differential in the league, have been playing without major pieces of the rotation, and breaking in a few new parts. They are a veteran team that knows the Nov/Dec beauty contests don’t mean much.
Nice work robert, as usual. I’ve believed since the day he came to Cleveland that Love is the key to this team. Not that he has to be a focal point, but finding out how to best utilize his incredible talent and keep him engaged as a teammate. Love doesn’t have the personality or the elite skill that LBJ and Kyrie have when it comes to scoring. Love needs more flow and team movement to utilize his strengths. They’re better at it this year, which is great. I think its going to be crucial that Kyrie and Love really get… Read more »
Another thing and it’s been a theme here. Let’s let go of this thing we are holding onto that says the Cavs need to win by 20 to appear like they are successful. The Raps game became a blowout in the last quarter, not all game long. I watched on CtB Live as people freaked out with the Cavs ‘only’ up by 5-6 points in the first half. Meanwhile it was clear the Cavs were doing a great job adjusting and held the Raps to less and less points per quarter as the game wore on. I think all of… Read more »
Cavs the Blog is a bad barometer. They freak out here no matter what happens. Just be calm and realize this team is already in the Finals.
What’s the point of having a blog if people cannot get emotional and provide there ideas/thoughts? If everything is calm down and wait until June, then the blog wouldn’t have much interesting content.
Provide ideas and thoughts, but the freak out over every single mid-range shot, or every single time a player doesn’t close out with the ferocity they will bring in the playoffs gets old fast.
Yet you freak out at any criticism or concern . . . irony is lost on you.
+ freaking one billion.
I think you are mis-classifying or misreading most of the folks on here. It’s okay to have concerns when the team is underperforming. It doesn’t mean the sky is falling.
The Warriors are coming back down to earth? They’ve lost two games and are on pace for a 77 win season…
Well, they are not on pace for 82-0 anymore, so they’re coming back to earth. Apparently.
Great stuff, Robert. Love does so much little stuff when he’s not in the spotlight, and we criticize his failures in the spotlight at times. But he genuinely seems to care about winning more than personal stats, which is going great to pay dividends for years. Cleveland’s ability to control the boards on both ends while still defending when they’re on the o-boards and leaking out when they’re on the d-boards is the best in the league, and love and TT are the biggest parts of that (also delly).
It is great for the team that Love cares more about winning than personal stats. Often, he will not take a mostly open shot for himself to make a great pass to a wide open team mate. I’m not sure that it always shows up in his stats, either. A guy who was like “I’m not getting enough touches” would just put it up.
Out curiosity. Do any females read or comment? I had a recent conversation where I expressed skeptism that there was any significant female population interested in NBA blogging. Also this diverged into a convo about whether there would ever be a female GM. I was also skeptical of that
I personally see think female head coaches are far more likely than GM’s. Basketball is already a heavily male interest. MAth and Statistics is an even more male interest if undergrad majors are any clue. And Business is a pretty male interest in its own right. Combine the 3 and it seems a long shot to have a female ever become a GM in my mind. Coaching outside of its relationship to sports though seems almost more a female interest. Education, life coaches, psychology are all slightly female interests and related to coaching.
There will easily be female GMs and coaches in our lifetime. Probably within the next 10 years.
I won’t out anyone by name, but yes.
Good job Robert.
I wouldn’t think there would be many roadblocks for female GMs. It’s all about stats and business. I would see some challenges with coaching but only because someone would have to break through. Like the female NFL coach (Cards?), there has to be someone out there TRYING to get in. I don’t see that person out there right now but I’m not plugged into those networks. But as Cols says below, we’ll see that in the next decade or so.
Hahahaha. It’s all about stats and business??!!! This is nuts. It’s alot about cronyism and nepotism. Stats and business….
My point is GM vs Coaching. Some players might look at a female and think she cannot coach(I don’t think there are as many of those guys out there today). No one is going to look at a female and think she doesn’t know how to run a business. Player evaluation can be done with tools and analytics. Yes there is some experience needed but look at all the terrible male GMs out there. It’s not a gender specific talent. The NBA is a very image-centric business. I don’t see the same roadblocks as there are in the commercial sector.… Read more »
Look, in a perfect world yes. But women, especially women in what are considered men’s sports, are not going to get the fair shake that you think they are.
I’m not saying tomorrow. I said I agreed with your timeline in previous posts…10 or so years.
I think that even with a fair hake that there just aren’t tons of women trying to get into that field. Some yes but probably more trying to coach. Thats why I asked if there are female readers here. I coached a Womens college team for 2 years and have 6 sisters all of which are avid Cavs fans. Not one of my sisters or players to my knowledge ever read a basketball blog in there lives. Now I’m not saying that GM’s need to read blogs but to me it shows interest in that field. A GM and reader… Read more »
Great stuff, Robert.
One thing, though (just trying to be helpful): you might want to make a quick edit and put in the link to the NYT article on Love’s passing in the place of the link that is there right now. On a related note: good luck going after the Metro copy editor position. Go get ’em!
Well, that’s embarrassing. I guess I just proved my lack of qualifications with that one, huh?
Link has been fixed and now goes to the NYTimes. Thanks!