Here Comes Leon Powe
2009-08-11Via Windhorst, it appears that the Cavaliers are about to sign a two-year deal with Leon Powe. I wrote something about the possibility of Powe when the rumors about him first started up, but I’ll try to expand upon those thoughts now. First off, read this excellent send-off to Powe by Zach Lowe over at Celtics Hub. After you’re done with that here, in no particular order, are my thoughts about Mr. Powe’s imminent acquisition:
1. This is a flyer, and a great one.
In my first “profiles in profiling” entry this year, I lamented how teams don’t take risks when it comes to their 12th men. Instead of taking a guy who you know is going to be passably insignificant, why not take a chance on a guy with a 10% chance of being a really good rotation player and a 90% chance of sucking in a spectacular and horrifying manner?
Yes, this is a guy whose best-case scenario is to join the team at the All-Star break, and who’s had such a bad history of knee problems there’s a legitimate chance he’ll never be an NBA-level player. On one level, it’s always scary to give any kind of a contract out when there’s that level of uncertainty involved. (Note: the deal is contingent on a physical exam, and there have been allusions to “protections” the Cavaliers may have in the deal, so the Cavs do have some safety nets in place.)
But on the other hand, this is Leon Powe for the veteran’s minimum. (According to Adrian Wojnarowski’s twitter feed.) That’s the same amount of money the Cavs paid Jawad Williams, Dwayne Jones, Lance Allred, you name it. It’s the minimum. You really can’t pay less than that. And when you start thinking about the deal that way, it looks like a steal from where I’m sitting.
Powe is a year and change removed from having a major impact in the NBA finals. Heck, it wasn’t all that long ago he was considered one of the 5 best players in his year-he was one of the other big names during one of LeBron’s turns at ABCD, if memory serves. When this guy is healthy, almost nobody doubts that he can flat-out play.
2. Leon Powe is really, really, really good at the things he’s good at.
Take this as you will: Leon Powe is about as good as an undersized, unathletic player with no range or ball skills to speak of can be. Yes, there’s a definite ceiling in terms of how many ways he can impact a game. But as a pure banger, Leon Powe is just about as good as they come. Powe had the best offensive rebound rate of any power forward for the second consecutive year last season, and 9th in rebound rate overall.
And offensively, Powe might not have any real jump shot whatsoever, but he knows his limitations and spends what time he has with the ball in the paint, shoving bodies around and trying to get the ball in the basket any way he can. 80% of Powe’s shots came in the immediate basket area last year, and despite his dip in proficiency on layup-type shots from 07-08 to 08-09, his love of the dunk gave him a very respectable 60% mark on “inside” shots.
Like Zach mentioned, Powe isn’t a “pure” post player, but he uses his strength, wide base, and touch to find some way to dump the ball in the basket when he catches the ball in the paint, albeit with little regard for aesthetics. He’s gotten a little better at passing when he’s down there, doubling his assist ratio from 07-08 last year, but he’s still not much of a playmaker down there. (He did improve, but remember that he had the worst assist ratio in basketball in 07-08.)
As many a disgruntled Laker fan will inform you, Powe’s best skill offensively is his ability to throw his body around in the paint and draw fouls-had he qualified, his 28% “draw foul” rate would have put him behind only Dwight Howard in the entire NBA. Leon Powe is one of the most efficient backup 4s in the league because he’s a guy that’s an artist in the scrum. He doesn’t see a need to try to do anything other than what he knows, make sense of the chaos that takes place when the ball is bouncing, the bodies are banging, and the elbows are flying under the basket.
3. Fit is a concern.
For all Powe’s strengths skill-wise, he still has major disadvantages athletically: he is much smaller than most centers and much slower than most power forwards. And he can’t stretch the floor. With Zydrunas, he’ll be relied on to show on pick-and-rolls and defend the perimeter, a dicey proposition. With Shaq, not only would he have to show on pick-and-rolls, but the floor spacing would get destroyed. With Anderson, the spacing is a concern, plus one of the two could have to guard a true 7-footer. Like a lot of Ferry’s acquisitions this off-season, the arrival of Powe seems to signal more small-ball lineups with LeBron, Moon or Parker playing the de facto 4 spot, and taking chances with Powe using his strength to guard the post.
Like a lot of blue-collar, undersized 4s who PER-type stats love (Powe, Chuck Hayes, Ike Diogu), Powe looks fantastic from an efficiency standpoint because he’s a role player who’s completely aware of his own limitations, is extremely good at a few things on the court, and doesn’t deviate from what he knows he’s good at. The flip side is that he can hurt the versatility of a 5-man unit by not being able to fill gaps and play a role within the greater system that asks him to do something outside of his very specific comfort zone.
So while I love Powe as a guy who can give impact minutes off the bench and even be the focus of a 3rd or 4th unit, I’m not sure if it’s realistic to see him as a guy playing long stretches of important minutes at any point down the line, even if he’s completely healthy. Boston was able to cover him pretty nicely, especially in 07-08, but remember that they have two legitimate defensive aces on their front-line in terms of KG and Kendrick Perkins, two guys who combine size, strength, and mobility in ways that can plug a lot of holes defensively. (And don’t forget the Thibodeau factor; he may be even more of a defensive savant than Mike Brown.)
4. Part of this feels like a JJ Hickson failsafe.
Hickson has a ton of potential, but I feel like he may have picked a really bad time to get a major injury. When he got hurt, he still had a lot of learning to do before he was ready to play serious minutes. Now he’s missed a lot of time at a pretty critical developmental stage, and I don’t think the front office is ready to bet the farm on Hickson being a rotation player this year. Hickson’s got the physical ability and package of skills to be a rotation big, while Powe has the instincts. I think the chances one of them cracks the rotation are better than the chances that both of them do. Part of this move may have been about taking a backup bet on another horse.
But overall, this is a great player and a great guy coming to the Cavaliers with very, very little financial risk involved, so my final position is that I congratulate the front office for getting yet another deal done, congratulate Mr. Powe for finding a team, and hope to see him on the floor reasonably soon.
—-
Our 642-467 exam and JN0-332 dumps provide you 100% pass guarantee. You can get access to 1Y0-A05 dumps and 1z0-050 with multiple prep resources of 70-663 dumps.
LOVE the Signing!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I remember Powe scored 20 points in a game against us this year!!!!!!!!!!
[…] Cavs: The Blog » Blog Archive » Here Comes Leon Powe […]
I think there should be a position by position breakdown of how the Cavs got better, something like:
Center: Shaq (Ilguaskas) = upgrade
PF: Varajeo = same
SF: James = same
SG: West = same
PG: Williams = same
Parker (Wally) = major upgrade
Ilgauskas (Wallace) = upgrade
Moon (Pavlovic) = upgrade
healthy Gibson (injured Gibson) = should be upgrade
Powe (Smith) = upgrade
From the looks of it, the Cavs upgraded pretty much everywhere.
[…] This post was Twitted by cavsbuzztap […]
Great move by the Cavs! We got Powe at a great ‘value’, we’ll pay him the minimum and we’ll in most likelyhood get a mid level or better performance out of him. IF his knees don’t heel (which they most likely will), then we’ll get a minimum or better performance for a minimum price. Certainly this is a no loss deal for the Cavs that can be a big win. As a team, the Cavs are a lot better this year than last. Shaq, Moon, Parker are clear upgrades. JJ SHOULD be better next year and Powe is at least… Read more »
Chris, that’s assuming the Magic even start Shard at the four. Van Gundy has said they are seriously considering going with Howard-Bass-Lewis-Carter-Nelson. All of a sudden that Bass matchup becomes a wash with Andy, LeBron gets big edge on Rashard, and Delonte has actually defended Carter very well.
As a Celtics Fan I am sad to see Leon go and hate that the business forced the C’s hand in letting him go (though I would have kept him and lost a few others on the end of the bench). I hope his knees fully recover, I think he is an exciting player to watch and definitely brings a spark off the bench.
from espn
“…Powe, whose preference was to remain in the Eastern Conference and to sign with the team most capable of giving him his best shot to exact some revenge on the Celtics after they effectively gave up on him by declining to tender him a qualifying offer…”
haha i love that. i’m gonna be rooting for powe
This is huge for the Cavs Bench. The celtics will miss him and will not like him signign with their biggest rival in the east. You gotta think a lot of these NBA teams are going to lose a lot of money next year with declining ticket sales and all the top teams going after a bunch of big named guys.
@ chris & chip…
don’t forget we can start other players. maybe in a matchup we can start parker vs. carter? or put moon on pietrus, bron on lewis?
i don’t think matchups are as much a concern as mike brown putting in the right matchup.
hurray for powe! wowe! i think i’m just excited something happened in cavs news other than lebron this week.
also thanks for keeping the posting this summer john. much appreciated.
in response to chip’s post i realize it’s not binary and that lebron’s matchup advantage is enormous while orlando’s matchup advantages in the other 4 spots is much smaller. and yes the varejao/lewis matchup can be alleviated a bit by some combination of moon/powe/lebron. but still, i can’t help but feel like this being ultimately a team game, that having only one matchup advantage to exploit game in and game out is not very comforting. orlando basically has a starting five with four all stars and an up-and-coming high-potential role player. we have a starting five with one automatic all… Read more »
I would also love to see a post on matchups, like Chris suggested.
He’s a great bargain piece, that fits the Cavs needs perfectly in regards to giving developmental time to JJ, while providing Mike Brown another experienced banger in the paint come playoff time.
By getting him with a team option for another year they also add a valued trading chip to possibly land another blue chip via sign and trade next offseason.
How could anyone not like this deal? There is 0 risk, its for the freaking minimum, he will make less then 1 million dollars. If he plays as well as he can, then its great because he is a solid bench player that will give us a boost during the stretch run. If he never plays, then who cares? Its practically like having Dwyane Jones back on the team if he never plays. Mike, 60% of your close shots is pretty good, its not like guys are standing 4 ft from the hoop with nobody guarding them. Close shots are… Read more »
I really like it when people call a move “low-risk, high-reward”. Has anyone ever called a move “low-reward”? Sure, we can all envision the best that Powe can bring, but we should temper our enthusiasm a bit, at least until he can get on a NBA court. And for Chris, this isn’t a binary system we’re working with, and even if it was, it’s not balanced at all. The Cavs are going to take great effort to prevent Varejao v Lewis matchups, while trying to maximize James v Pietrus ones.
i think you should write a post talking about matchups. one thing i haven’t been able to understand is that don’t matchup problems go both ways? it’s true delonte may not be long enough to guard someone like hedo, but on the other end isn’t hedo not quick enough to guard someone like delonte? or were orlando’s personnel both longer AND equally as quick as our team? …. and on that discussion of matchups i’m curious to see whether or not you think our new personnel additions will truly matchup well with the other contenders. focusing on orlando, here’s how… Read more »
Since when is making 60% of your “close” shots respectable? That’s not a stat that I was aware of, but I certainly wouldn’t be trumpeting that stat as anything less than “really bad.”
if anything at least it gives us another guy who’s big and strong enough to straight up foul dwight howard instead of giving him a million and-one’s.
i remember powe inflicting some pretty serious damage on the offensive end against our bigs last year too. i didn’t really understand how he got it done cuz it was nasty, but pretty or not he got it done. it definitely doesn’t hurt our team to take a small risk on a guy like that. good move ferry
I think this is a huge, huge bargain. Yeah, he’s still coming back from an injury, but by the time the playoffs start he’ll have been contributing for awhile and back in rhythm. Sure, the frontcourt is a bit crowded now, but that’s a positive problem to have. If one of the Cavs’ bigs gets hurt, this really helps ’em.
Can’t believe he signed for only the minimum.
[…] Golf Classic AJC The Hawks’ secret weapon: Shelden the sleeper is a Celtic Cavs the Blog Here Comes Leon Powe Hoopsworld NBA AM: Still Waiting Out The Knicks FanHouse Married Men Kindly Request Reggie Miller […]
I dont think adding powe could hurt the team at all with him and shaq two great rebounders its definitly worth a try. I still have an expiriment in mind with having Lebron running at the 4 virtually u can create mismatches for the other team every night with Lebrons size speed and raw athleticism. Just as an expiriment if it doesnt work we culd always switch back. The main problem would probably be if Lebron gets in foul trouble but Let me know what you guys think
Im an Orlando fan but Ive got to say, if this deal is exactly how its reported, then this is fantastic pick up for the Cavs. Like the author says, its not likely to be a “home-run” but given the risk/reward ratio on offer here, its a no brainer and one that all other 29 NBA teams should do if they were given the same chance as the opportunity cost is virtually nothing (one roster spot). Even if it works, its unlikely to fill in all of the current perceived gap the Cavs have (someone mentioned a stretch 4 earlier… Read more »
Love the signing (if/when it becomes official). Low risk, high reward. And I had to pinch myself when I saw the TEAM option for the 2nd year. Don’t know how we managed to fleece that one… Oh and HILARIOUS pic at the top.
I think the link to to Zach Lowe’s sendoff needs to be corrected.
I don’t like that signing. We needed a stretch 4. someone who stretch the defense and knock down that 15 to 17 foot jumper. When we are playing the smart defensive teams such as the Lakers, Celtics, Spurs and many more. They will dare Powe and Varejao to make those jump shot by using their guy to help on Lebron and/or Shaq, and plus we don’t know how he will bounce back from all those knee injuries