Kawhi Leonard – Draft Profile
2011-05-30Athletic tests from the draft combine were released. Derrick Williams had average vertical jumping, but lead the combine in the bench press and was in the top half for the speed and agility drills. Brandon Knight was top 5 (of 53) for the speed and agility drills and in the top third for vertical leaping. Knight also performed ten reps of 185 lbs in the bench press. One player with disappointing athleticism test results was Kawhi Leonard. Leonard had the 7th worst standing vertical jump, 12th worst maximum vertical, was in the bottom third on agility drills, and performed three reps in the bench press. Leonard is a potential top 5 pick and deserves a closer look.
Kawhi Leonard
Height: 6’ 7”
Weight: 227 lbs
Position: SF
Age: Turns 20 in June
Summary: Kawhi Leonard just finished his sophomore year at San Diego State. He was the leader in scoring, rebounding, and steals for a 34 win team. He is most intriguing due to his length and energy level and is viewed as a top 4 – 8 pick.
Basketball Bio: Kawhi Leonard played high school basketball in San Diego, where he was named Mr. Basketball California his senior season. As the 60th ranked recruit in the class of 2009, he stayed close to home and attended San Diego State. His freshman year, Leonard lead the Mountain West Conference (MWC) in rebounding and was first team all conference. In 2010 – 2011, Leonard averaged 15.4 points and 10.7 rebounds in 32 minutes while leading SD State to the MWC tournament championship and the sweet 16 of the NCAA tournament.
Skill Overview: Leonard is a great rebounder. While not possessing outstanding jumping ability, he gets off the floor quickly and has long arms and huge hands. His wingspan is 7’ 3”, amazing for a 6’7” player, and his hands were the largest of the 2011 NBA draft combine. Leonard is an active, high energy player and a hard worker; often described as a “gym rat”. These attributes allowed Leonard to snag the 9th most rebounds per game this year, despite SD State playing at only 64 possessions per game (68 was NCAA’s median). He was most effective on the defensive glass, grabbing 26% of the available rebounds which was the 15th best rate in the NCAA. Another strength is that Leonard uses his length and energy as a force on the defensive end. Guarding multiple positions (2, 3 & 4), he is disruptive in the passing lanes and fights through picks defending pick and rolls. Offensively, he can create scoring opportunities for himself and is also a good passer, finishing second on the Aztecs with 2.5 assists per game against only 2.1 turnovers.
Offensively, Leonard is still a work in progress. He shot 29% on three pointers in 2010 – 2011 and 31% on long 2 pointers. He wasn’t particularly skilled at anything, instead showcasing average ability to score in many different ways. Based on data from Synergy Sports (via draftexpress.com); Leonard was slightly below average as a per possession scorer on spot-ups, isolations, put-backs, fast breaks, cuts, and pick & rolls. Leonard creates scoring opportunities each of these ways, but was unable to distinguish himself as extremely effective at any of them. Leonard shot 44% from the field and had a true shooting percentage of only 51. He shoots free throws at 75%, but shoots less than one free throw for every three field goal attempts. At offseason workouts in Las Vegas, scouts have been very impressed by the work Leonard is putting into shooting and ball handling.
Additional Info / Advanced Stats: Due to his positional flexibility, size, and energy; Leonard is known as a high quality defender. He collects steals at 1.4 per game, good for 4th in the MWC (225th in the NCAA), but only blocked 0.6 shots per game. Sometimes these two stats are poor means to evaluate defensive impact. Looking deeper at SD State’s plus / minus, it appears their defense was better when Leonard was on the bench. Starting with their first BYU game (final17 games), SD State allowed 0.94 points per possession with Leonard playing compared to 0.87 with Leonard sitting. Over these games; the SD State defense was good with Leonard, but great when he was on the bench, as the 0.87 points per possession edges Fairfield’s NCAA best defense (0.88). This is a small sample size at just over three games worth of off-court possessions, but the difference in performance is enough to say that SD State’s defense was not better with Leonard playing. Perhaps the way that Leonard was used within SDSU’s system was not perfectly suited to his talents.
The most used comparisons for Leonard are Shawn Marion and Gerald Wallace. Both use their athleticism to rebound and play defense and are also good offensive players, despite below average outside shooting. Leonard probably projects as a “poor-man’s” version of either player. Marion has been racking up defensive stats since his college days, when he averaged 1.9 blocks and 2.5 steals at UNLV. Wallace has been first team NBA all-defense and, at his best, improved the Bobcats defense up to six points per 100 possessions when on the court. Leonard is probably not on that level and Marion and Wallace were likely not in the bottom third of their draft class in tests for agility and jumping.
A month ago, Leonard was considered a late lottery pick and that may still be appropriate. Leonard is undoubtedly a very good rebounder, plays with high energy, and works at improving his game. He is a reasonably skilled ball handler and passer. In interviews, Leonard wants to be viewed as a 2 / 3 however a more realistic career is as a 3 / 4. A lesser possible comparison could be a better version of Matt Barnes. Both are around 6’7” and 235 lbs. They are great rebounders, bring a lot of energy, and are capable of guarding multiple positions. Both are average to below average shooters, but Leonard can bring more to the table as an offensive player and has better defensive tools than Barnes. Leonard will be a valuable NBA player, but likely won’t be a top echelon offensive or defensive player.
nbadraft.net just switched their mock draft to the Cavs taking Williams at #1. At this point, I’m thinking the move is to try to get the rights Rubio and the #2 for Irving and change. Then Williams, and Kanter/Knight (depending on who Utah takes). If we get the #8 Biyambo/Burk. The beauty of this plan is that half these guys can go play in Europe next year if there’s a lockout.
false~cognate – why irving, kanter, and biyombo? I don’t have anything against any of them, but I’m just curious. It’s interesting because they are the three first rounders with the least actual basketball experience against higher levels of competition. The Nupe – Burks is growing on me. He’s actually one month younger than Leonard. Offensive Rating measures a players total offensive contribution (scoring, passing, offensive boards) in points produced per 100 possessions. Anyways, kenpom.com has calculated the offensive rating for all NCAA players. Burks had the 7th highest offensive rating of any player last year with minimum 28% usage. Burks… Read more »
False-cognate [nice handle, btw!] – can’t believe I forgot Biyombo. Thx!
JAG – thanks – if other GMs think it’s a crappy draft, then acquiring picks (espec. 1st rounders) could be feasible. Stashing 2-3 future players instead of paying salary to a question mark does make sense. You’d hope that your team’s GM is looking hard for 2nd round sleepers, so maybe the 1st round/’stash-a-Euro’ plan will pay off.
Another thought – if we draft Kanter who is already rusty AND the lockout is going to go well into the season.. maybe we send Kanter there to get some PT?
Rick- signing and drafting foreigners might be the play to use in this type of draft. It has been employed by San Antonio very succesfully in the past and is being talked about a lot by teams in the mid to late first round. This is in regard to players like Nogueira and Mirotic and maybe Bertans. Valanciunas and Motiejunas actually might fit the mold for early picks. If the Cav’s powers that be decide that there isn’t much upside to most players available after the first few selected, it could be the way to go. There isn’t any sense… Read more »
IF Cavs get the #8, and he’s still on the board, then Biyombo has gotta be the choice. I’m salivating over a team with a core of him, Irving, and Kanter…
So why not use a possible #8 and/or later picks to stockpile Europeans with much higher upside (Valanuncias in the lottery; SF Markotic & C Matejounas [sp] in mid/later 1st; maybe SF Bogusevic in late 1st/early 2nd)
Do we actually care if we have multiple guys learning their craft in Europe & bring them over when their buyouts shrink and have matured a bit… and we are ready to get busy???
p.s. Does anyone have any insight into possible stash-able Euros?
I like Kawhi – but I’d look at Burks instead if both were available. However, I could easily see Kawhi being the better player long-term. There is a point in time where the combine really matters, but the overall performance from the previous season(s) trumps all. Plus, since he’s still so young, you never know how much better he MAY get. This draft isn’t that deep and Kawhi is ‘ifee’, Burks I see as a more ‘stable’ choice but not necessarily by much.
The fact that anyone that the Cav’s get at SF/SG will be an upgrade is a scary proposition, unless it is for the very short term. Depending on the rookie salary and contract agreements made with the new CBA, they have to be careful not to tie up too much money and time on someone that is just slightly better than what they have currently. Just slightly better than what they have currently at SF/SG might not even be a role player on a contender, which should be their ultimate goal.
Colin, You are an intelligent guy, so good luck to me on educating you. On a hypothetical future Cavs championship team (or any contending team); I see Leonard as the 4th or 5th best offensive player and a versatile, but not lockdown, defender. That’s a fine thing to be in the NBA and is better than an energy guy, but is not the player you hope to get with a high lottery pick. With a hypothetical #8 pick, Leonard would be in the running for me; but I lean toward Alec Burks right now. In my final pre-draft post, I… Read more »
Kevin, I’d like your opinion on this: in your estimation, is Leonard an energy guy with a limited skill set? I don’t mean to be reductive; I’m seeking an education. How do you see him fitting into the Cavs rotation long-term? And if he doesn’t, why not?
(Of course, all of this is under the assumption we acquire the #8 pick and don’t trade it; so I’m operating in a fantasy land.)
Apparently, Leonard didn’t have a chance to warm up prior to testing (most other attendants had a 45 min warmup) so take the poor results with a grain of salt.
Draft Express says he is more of a “smooth” athlete rather than an “explosive” one, as well.
If the Cavs are able to get the #8 pick and keep it, I would take Leonard with that pick in a heartbeat. The #4 would definitely be a reach, though.
Likely no player was hurt by the combine tests more than Leonard. I wouldn’t be surprised if he drops out of the top ten.