Recap: Celtics 93, Cavs 90
2012-01-31This was a strange game. The Cavs defended well and shot poorly for the first twenty minutes, allowed the Celtics to pull away as the first half came to a close, didn’t look competitive again until there were nine minutes left in the fourth quarter. Then they lost the game in the dying moments due to a couple of clutch buckets by the Celts. It was a lot of fun.
–Andy Varejao earned the first 20-20 game of his career. “Earned” is the operative word here. I don’t always commend Varejao on his effort because it’s ever-present, and it would be boring if I wrote “Great hustle by Andy” in every recap, but his relentlessness single-handedly kept the Cavs in the game when they were down by 20. Even in the depths of a blowout, he continued to inhale offensive rebounds and stay active on defense. Andy V’s not a good shooter (though he hit a few jumpers in this one), doesn’t have an impressive array of post-up moves, and isn’t built like Dwight Howard, but he’s a special player. His teammates should take him out to dinner after this pair of performances he’s put in against the Celtics.
–I like Ramon Sessions just fine as a combo guard who, in limited minutes, can score on a team that occasionally lapses into severe offensive deficiency, but Boobie Gibson and Anthony Parker need to get healthy ASAP, because when Sessions is forced to shoulder too much responsibility, the results can be disastrous. I’ve noticed lately that he delivers some absolutely horrendous passes off of penetration. In the first quarter, he drove to the foul line, drew a double-team, then chucked a haphazard pass at an open Kyrie Irving, who had to gather the pass, re-balance himself, then missed a three that would have been uncontested had the pass been anywhere near his shooting pocket. He did something similar two possessions later, when he threw the ball over Varejao’s head as Andy was rolling toward the basket. Where Irving weaves through the defense and usually makes the correct decision, Sessions jumps in the air and either sprays a pass three feet to the left of a teammate or takes a contested jumper.
–Irving was largely ineffectual in the first half. He missed a couple of open jumpers, dropped off six assists, and was smothered by the Celtics, who shaded their defense toward him the entire game. This is a minor detail, but I liked that, after missing a couple jumpers in the first half, Irving realized he needed to get himself some easy points. So, on a pair of offensive trips, he drove to the bucket, and drew fouls on both sequences. The one thing you worry about with players who are both good shooters and gifted at getting to the rim is that they will fall in love with their outside game and neglect opportunities to take high-percentage shots. Irving displayed his high basketball IQ tonight in realizing he needed to make things easier on himself when his jumper wasn’t falling.
–In the final quarter, Irving shined. He drained a couple of pull-ups, finished a lay-in from a ridiculous angle, got to the free throw line, and threw one of the most dazzling non-assists I’ve ever seen when he passed the ball behind his back from the hardwood to avoid turning the ball over. It’s reassuring that Irving has exhibited, even at age nineteen, that he wants the ball in pressure situations, but what’s been equally impressive is that he’s actually come through half the time.
–TT had no impact on tonight’s game. He twisted his already-ailing ankle early in the second quarter, was slated to return, then trainers decided to shut him down after reexamining the ankle at half. I’ll probably have an update on his injury tomorrow.
The Cavs have a two-day respite before they meet the Magic in Orlando on Friday. Until tomorrow, you guys.
Trill: “Oj Mayo seems about right. ” But Batum would be intriguing. He should be one of our offseason targets.
@JAG andy is not a center. he is playing out of position and yes, due to the dearth of REAL centers in the league, he is able to get away with it. but watch what happens to him against howard. we’ve seen it before. andy cannot do much against howard. my point simply was that if perkins got you a high pick like green back, then andy could get you a young player and a pick! that is the kind of move the cavs have to be looking to make. and btw, who the hell said anything about mayo in… Read more »
There are maybe ten centers in the entire NBA that can play at a level as high as Andy. Two or three are probably better. That means that more than half of the teams in the NBA don’t have anyone that could replace Andy. Their plight is not a result of them not trying. Centers are very very hard to find. Cavs fans that think that a random lottery pick would be a good trade for a quality center are deluded. The truth is that there are several centers in this years draft that have some potential. Even if they… Read more »
Trade Andy for what? O.J. Mayo? He’s an undersized two guard who isn’t that efficient, isn’t that great at getting to the rack (or finishing there), and plays mediocre defense? Also, he’s due a pay raise very soon. Why in God’s name would you trade someone on one of the most reasonable contracts in the NBA for O.J. Mayo? You only trade Andy for a top 5 pick, or a bonafied under 27 all star.
If you trade guys you love, then you’re just rooting for laundry.
I think before the draft, the assumption was that the Cavs realistically had to project something like a 5-year rebuild, and based on that premise it made sense to trade Varejao rather than count on him being a key piece to an emerging contender at age 34. But now that we are starting to see just how good Kyrie is already and can be, I think that projection should change. The value of age-31 Varejao to a team led by Kyrie in his 3rd pro season (2013-14) now appears greater than it did before. And part of that value is… Read more »
@Kyle – “Andy’s the type of player I can’t see aging all that well over the 2-3 years”: what is it about Varejao that makes you conclude this? He’s not a player that relies on overwhelming athleticism or a great vertical leap. He’s had his share of injuries, in part due to the style of play that makes him so valuable, but (as far as I can tell) nothing chronic like a recurring back or knee problem. Nor is he a heavier player on whom the mileage of NBA seasons could take their toll faster. And big men normally don’t… Read more »
I agree, and think the Cavs should trade Andy this season because his value is the highest it will ever be. He’s playing out of his mind putting up his best numbers ever, and in a shortened season where the playoffs will potentially see a lot of chaos and upset I’m sure every near-contender will at least consider him as an option. We really could get a big return for him and one that will outweigh his future value I think. Andy’s the type of player I can’t see aging all that well over the next 2-3 years so I… Read more »
i think, actually, that the cavs could most definitely get a GM ot “overpay” for andy now. why? because andy has actual NUMBERS now. he is averaging a double/double. he leads he league in offensive rebounds. these are NOT intangibles like hustle and effort, etc. these are quantifiable numbers which a GM could march out to show a fanbase when he trades for him. i think that is very important. if perkins can bring back a guy who was top 10 pick, then andy could bring back someone as good or better because andy right now surely has far better… Read more »
Barring another team getting stupid and giving up way too much, any thoughts of trading Andy should be shelved for the immediate future. I’m thinking that the kind of trade the Cavs could do for him this year will still be available over the next couple of years. My reason for keeping him now is that there is a very realistic chance that the Cavs rebuild could happen faster than we all thought, as long as Andy is still on the team. The Cavs have enough draft picks and CAP space that it is not unrealistic that they could add… Read more »
I hope people are beginning to finally realize that there is no way we get good value for Andy. He is worth an All-Star type swing player (which there are more of) and a pick. No GM is going to give us that though. I have never wanted to trade Andy, and I still don’t. Yes, he is our best asset, but we would not be better without him. I would cry if we got a Jeff Green type player for one of the best defensive players in the entire league. We are not that far away, and he will… Read more »
eldaveablo, it’s definitely not you
Jamison is the bizarro Varejao in what he brings to a team
I know this may be a dumb comparison, however, if the Celtics can get Jeff Green for the “exact opposite of a stat sheet stuffer” Kendrick Perkins then the Cavs have to get something of similar value for Varejao. Oj Mayo seems about right.
Also, Varejao > Perkins.
Is it me, or is Jamison the complete opposite of Andy? He puts up stats that overplay his actual impact, his on-court demeanor does not inspire any confidence or effort, and you don’t want the young guys following him too closely.
I really hope the Cavs can get something for him before the trade deadline. Ugh.
Kevin started the dialog I wanted to – Andy was absolutely the best guy out there last night. I honest to god think he’s deserving of an All Star spot this year – he has more value to his team than almost any other player does to theirs. It’s almost a travesty that he’s not going to be an all star this year – he’s definitely played like one.
This seems odd to say after a game where the Cavs trailed by 20 and he shared the court with Kevin Garnett, Paul Pierce, and Ray Allen; but Varejao was the best player on the court all night. When things were at their worst in the third quarter, I was marvelling at how fortunate this team is to have him around.
Can anyone explain why Samardo Samuels spent the entire game outside of the paint? Every time he got the ball, it was either at the top of the key or just inside the 3 pt. line. I suppose he doesn’t match up well against Garnett. But in the 3rd, he was guarded by O’Neal & Bass. I think he could have scored on either of them.
Antawn’s shooting selection is absolutely terrible. If we can get something – anything – for him, we have to do it, right?
Thompson looked pretty good. It seemed like he really bothered Ray Allen with his length. He has a good stroke too. I’d love to see him get some of AP’s minutes, just to see if he can be a contributor.