Man on Fire
2012-02-21On Thursday, after a Heat practice before Friday’s game against the Cavaliers, LeBron James responded to a reporter’s question about a possible return to Cleveland by stating it would be “fun to play in front of [Cavs] fans again. I had a lot of fun times here… I’m here as a Miami player and I’m happy where I am now but I don’t rule that out in any sense. If I decide to come back, hopefully the fans will accept me.”
Bron’s statement is the latest Twitter-exploding product of the weird psychodrama in which he has participated since sometime in 2008 when Sportscenter producers, attempting to kill time during slow news days, filled empty content blocks with speculation as to where he would land in the summer of 2010. After two years of playing coy with the media, a summer of placating his id, and a season and a half playing for the most hated team in the league, LeBron now reminds me increasingly of Jeffrey Beaumont. He struck out for the idea of Miami—balmy weather, sex, neon—but the rabbit hole went deeper than he could initially fathom. He’s being beaten to the tune of Roy Orbison’s “In Dreams.” He just wants to go home.
Metaphorically speaking. I don’t think LeBron James wants to play basketball in Cleveland again. Rather, he wants everything to be like it was when he played in Cleveland, when he was the closest thing the league had to a nationwide fan favorite. He wants fans in other NBA cities to admire, even covet, him. He wants to win a championship and say he did it for his hometown, even though I think it’s pretty irrelevant to LeBron where and for whom he wins a title. He wants 2008 again, but without Mo Williams clanking wide-open threes. He feels bad, too. Remorse hit him like a sneak-attack hangover. He wants Cavs fans to not hate him anymore, perhaps not so they won’t feel anguished, but so that he won’t have to bear the burden of being the cause of their anguish. His motivations for tone-deaf half-promises of a return to Cleveland are selfish, but also well-intentioned in their own ineffectual way.
The Akron Beacon’s Jason Lloyd, in an article about the feasibility of an LBJ Cleveland homecoming, described Bron as “fairly calculated and savvy with the media,” which was true two years ago. For most of his time in Cleveland, LeBron was an opaque amalgam of talent, team-first platitudes, and exuberance. On a macro scale, he talked about championships; on a micro scale, he wanted “get better” every day; on the court, he conducted himself like a superhero who realized, each day anew, that he could fly. NBA fans knew almost nothing about him. This formula—being great, never saying anything controversial, and playing joyfully—endeared LeBron to even non-Cavs fans. Since deviating from that formula, LeBron has grown increasingly translucent; it’s now apparent that Cavaliers Era LeBron’s immense popularity was an essential component of his identity.
We know this because James spent last season in Miami trying to figure out who he was after realizing he had taken a blowtorch to LeBron James, Universally-Beloved Superstar. He made a token attempt to embrace the villain tag many fans and commentators placed upon him, but when LeBron buried a pair of clutch threes in an overtime game against the Blazers and taunted the Portland crowd, it didn’t feel right. The black hat doesn’t suit him because he’s not a spiteful player. A Kobe-like inferiority complex is the incorrect fuel for his engine. If his on-court actions in seven seasons with the Cavaliers are any indication, a crucial element of LeBron’s game is how much fun he has playing basketball. And fun is sort of an inclusive process: it’s difficult to have fun when the crowd wants to murder you in a well. The experience of knocking that crowd on their ass is fun for some athletes—I recall Derek Jeter once saying that he liked nothing more than to silence Fenway Park—but I’m not sure a stone-faced assassination of 20,000 ornery Bulls fans is LeBron’s ideal night. He would rather those Bulls fans harbor an awful respect for him. Which is why his post-Cavs career, as it unfolds, seems as much a nomadic quest to be liked again as it does the pursuit of a ring. If Kobe’s MJ emulation act is about equaling or surpassing Jordan’s greatness, LeBron most admires Michael’s near-unblemished approval rating. Becoming a global icon, after all, is only incidentally about winning.
Of course, LeBron has probably put the global icon thing on the back burner. He has championships to win, and when he arrived at the Quicken Loans Arena for a Thursday practice, he had fences to mend. This newfound concern over the damage he has inflicted is why Bron gives us puzzling quotes like the ones he made Thursday. He has finally realized that the antipathy generated by The Decision was mostly his fault, and he’s trying to salve the wound without much understanding of how he can repair his relationship with Cavaliers fans. He did all he could do when he admitted that he made a mistake, but the strange prognostication that followed came from a place of unabsolvable guilt. Maybe if I tell Cleveland fans that there’s a slight possibility I will play for the Cavs again, they’ll understand that I didn’t mean to hurt their feelings. It’s logic lifted straight from Kanye’s 2010 apology tour: if you can’t apologize sufficiently, do so in as bizarre a manner as possible.
The timing of this augmented expression of regret is awkward because the mourning process over LeBron’s departure concluded some eight months ago. Or it should have. The popular analogy among embittered fans and commentators is that of being abandoned by a significant other, but that’s lazy and inexact. Free agency isn’t a concept that has a parallel in the romantic sphere, and LeBron didn’t leave Cleveland in its sleep. He held an ill-advised press conference, and ruined exactly one Cavaliers season. Did he crawl into your heart and slash its wiring? Has your self-esteem disintegrated? Do you have trust issues now? I’m sorry, then.
What do you do when you can’t go home again? Or, more pointedly, what does LeBron do? Apparently he tries to convince others that he might go home again. One of the greatest athletes of his generation is experiencing an identity crisis while having the best season of his career. It’s like watching fire try to figure out its motivation. And maybe that’s the best way to think about LeBron James: he’s an exhilarant and nothing else about him makes sense. I hope he can come home one day, maybe after he retires, and start making sense. In the meantime, he’s a ball of flame with nowhere to go. There are worse things in this world.
As a writer, I’m glad I found this blog. I love reading it, and this piece is one of the many reasons why. “It’s like watching fire try to figure out its motivation.” Yes, it is. It wasn’t LeBron leaving Cleveland. It was the WAY he did it. Clevelanders know this, of course, even if many analysts still seem to get it wrong. Personally, it took me some time to understand why LeBron would announce his decision the way he did – a huge slap in the face to the city of Cleveland given its history of heartbreaking sports melodrama… Read more »
Colin,
Thanks for a really good read.
I’m glad you had something smart to say, because my opinion on Lebron’s recent comments is “*#!@ Lebron”.
Good stuff.
At first I was hoping it would be about Manny’s return to action tonight. He has been on fire lately! Anything from the 2 guard spot at this point would be more than welcome…Gee is out of place and playing 2 PG’s is not particularly fun to watch.
I am with John, and am surprised that so many other Clevelanders are not. In my view, this is NOT about sports. Its about our city. The point of taking pride in a sports championship is that the championship projects and embodies the pride we have in our home. Winning a championship with LBJ, after he metaphorically spit on our city on national TV, would vitiate the whole enterprise – it requires admitting that the end goal (the championship) is worth more than the ideal the goal represents (civic pride).
I am disheartened by how easily people re-embrace this man.
The significant other analogy might be lazy – but that’s only because it IS so exact. Sometimes analogies are just that easy. You might not think people should feel a certain way about something but that doesn’t mean they don’t.
“Metaphorically speaking. I don’t think LeBron James wants to play basketball in Cleveland again. Rather, he wants everything to be like it was when he played in Cleveland, when he was the closest thing the league had to a nationwide fan favorite. ” – Very true.
He isn’t coming back, and I wouldn’t want him if he did. He would just sully the title. I want us to win because we built a championship team. Through drafts, savvy moves, and maybe a little luck. If he comes back and we actually win everyone will say it was given to us and we won’t get cred. If he comes back and we lose then its “look at how bad you are you can’t even win with LBJ”. So no, don’t take him back. I guess the only way it could be good is if he came back,… Read more »
I would have completely dismissed the idea of LeBron wanting to come back, but after seeing the Adrian Woj story on yahoo, there could be a little credibility to it. Even Brian Windhorst mentioned in a podcast on WKNR, that things aren’t how they imagined it would be. By “they” he was referring to LeBron and the Heat management. All that being said, it still seems very unlikely. I agree with Colin that the timing is strange. LeBron and the Heat are playing very well now. You would think LeBron would have his eyes on the prize. Not looking in… Read more »
Strongest take I’ve seen on the subject yet. Great job Colin.
I don’t buy that he was just saying these things to try to win back Cavs fans. If that were the case he wouldn’t reportedly be letting the Cavs know through back channels that he is interested in coming back. I think it is entirely more likely that he see’s a young, talented Cavs team with a good coach, he’s not having anywhere near as much fun as he did in Cleveland, an owner and GM in Miami who don’t cater to his every want like the Cavs did and an opt-out in 2014 when he’s still only 29 years… Read more »
Matt: I meant nomadic. As in “without home, perpetually wandering.” Though Bron is a quixotic figure as well.
Anytime the Cavs can obtain one of the 5 best players in the league, I think we should do it. Even if it is LeBron. At the end of the day having better players with talent is better than the alternative. I understand that Grant may have ‘character’ issues about LeBron, but in a few years from now, you could expect LeBron to have grown as a person – possibly even as a player. The one thing that ‘annoys’ me about LeBrons comment was that he said “…If I decide to come back…” This bothers me as it rings in… Read more »
Colin, this is easily the best writing you’ve had since being a part of this blog. You’ve improved a lot, and it’s noticeable. Well written, and good ideas all around. Articulated how I feel about LeBron.
Personally, I want Lebron to come back to Cleveland, just so he can make Scott Raab’s total exclusion from the Q a condition of his return.
And yes, the irony that my irrational disgust for Raab has reached similar the same level as Raab’s for James does not escape me. But this last article tipped me over the edge:
http://www.esquire.com/the-side/lebron-james/lebron-return-to-cleveland-6693098?click=news
I’m torn between giving it maybe 7 extra page views and having some other people share my horror/amusement that this man is still trying to get the ‘Whore of Akron’ to be a thing : /
Hate to split hairs, but when you wrote “a nomadic quest to be liked again” . .. . . did you mean quixotic? Is it about his mobility (i.e. being a nomad) or chasing windmills that you think are giants? That is, Lebron has set off in pursuit of something unattainable. Thanks for the analysis. I have to admit that I am still tied to the Lebron “narrative.” He burned us (Cavs fans), but after watch every one rail on the ESPN discussion boards about how over-rated he is, I guess I just want him to get his and then… Read more »