Draft Profile: Thomas Robinson
2012-03-22Having said all that, 90% of me wants Cleveland to draft a wing with their first pick. The above paragraph primarily serves as my excuse to not ignore half the likely lottery. Today, a quick look at Thomas Robinson, Kansas’ junior big man that both ESPN and draftexpress.com currently rate third in 2012.
Robinson encompasses the entire physical package of a prototype NBA four. He’s 6’9″ (or 6’10”) with a large wingspan and carries a chiseled 240 lbs. As a coordinated, explosive athlete that plays with non-stop motor, he racks up 18 points and 12 rebounds in 32 minutes per game . Grabbing 32% of available defensive rebounds ranks first in the NCAA, which is really impressive considering Kansas’ schedule. He puts in the needed effort on defense and has the right tools, including physicality to bang down low and agility to defend the perimeter. Despite making significant strides since last year, his offensive repertoire still has room to grow. Exhibiting great effectiveness scoring on putbacks, cuts & in transition, his jump shot is a work in progress (35% this year according to draft express).  He did convert 6 of 13 threes though and shot 70% on foul shots, which are frequent for him, thanks to a quick first step and an aggressive offensive demeanor, both attacking off the dribble in isolation or after establishing deep position on the block. The post move portfolio doesn’t always feature a feathery touch or perfect footwork, but he’ll shoot hook shots with both hands and flash dynamic spin moves and drop steps.  Turnovers pose a problem; struggles with double teams and the growing pains of developing a back-to-the-basket arsenal result in nearly three botched possessions a game. Finally, he doesn’t appear to have the basket protection gene, registering less than one block per game. As an integral part of the NCAA’s ninth ranked defense; he’s clearly not a liability though.
Notes from recent games include:
02/08 vs Baylor – Robinson’s good and bad were on full display in this 68 – 54 Jayhawk win, as he finished with 15 points on 61% true shooting with 11 rebounds and 5 turnovers. Nine points came due to hustle and off-the-ball movement, scoring in transition and off cuts. In addition, he stroked one long jumper and finished a strong drive for another basket. Great positioning and box-outs limited his lottery-bound counterpart Perry Jones III to three rebounds. Despite only netting one assist, many solid passes by him from the post ended in open misses. On the downside, perimeter players have little to fear on a drive when they find Robinson in their sights; he offered little resistance as Kansas’ last line of defense. Last, and probably least, his tendency to lose the ball in the post was apparent.
03/18 vs Purdue – This was a peculiar game for Robinson. He struggled offensively, finishing 2 of 12 from the field, but he visited the line frequently, drawing seven fouls and finishing with 11 points. In addition to his thirteen rebounds, he was Varejao-esque in keeping offensive rebounds alive; four times in the first half, he battled to get a hand on the ball, resulting in continued Jayhawk possession. His passing offered a glimpse of promise; one of his three assists was a nifty drive & kick, and several potential dimes were thwarted by open shooters hoisting bricks.
Not all news was positive though. Frustrated by the Purdue defense, his touch in the paint and from the perimeter was poor; he air balled a hook shot, missed an accidental bank shot from the area of the foul line, etc. Bad hands also presented themselves, though fortunately for Robinson on a few occasions, a bobbled ball bounced off Purdue and KU retained possession. Basically the ratio of smooth offensive plays to clumsy possessions didn’t end in Robinson’s favor.
KU’s defense was the odd aspect of this game. Robinson started by guarding Robbie Hummel, Purdue’s senior stretch 4, who couldn’t miss and scored 11 points in the first eight minutes. I wasn’t concerned about T-Rob’s defense on Hummel; it looked like a player with 1800 career points making tough shots. At some point in the first half, another Jayhawk switched onto Hummel. Kansas’s halftime adjustments are when things got interesting though; Robinson’s primary defensive responsibility involved going man-to-man with a variety of small guards, including 5’9″ Lewis Jackson on a couple of possessions. Kansas also intermittently switched to matchup zones, like a triangle-and-two. The strategy provided a mixed bag of results for Robinson, but ultimatley it worked; in the second half, Kansas finished +13 with Robinson on the court and -4 when he sat. On one pick and roll, it appeared he forgot that his man was the ball handler, and once in a zone setup, he wandered around like a concussion victim…I credited these poor showings to Kansas running defenses they had probably practiced for half an hour. Generally, he displayed solid perimeter defensive fundamentals, keeping low to the ground, arms out, moving his feet well; his quickness was on full display. I noted seven separate possessions where Purdue tried to attack Robinson with a guard in isolation or by running a pick-and-roll with Robinson as the on-ball defender; Purdue only scored on three. It wasn’t always pretty, but given the assignment, he represented himself well.
Summary: Robinson’s size, strength & skills, combined with athleticism and intensity make him a can’t miss. He’ll play hard, rebound, and provide some offense immediately, while ideally continuing to expand his post game and add range to his jumper. If he can slightly improve his shot, he could look pretty good next to Tristan; a floor spacing, defensive rebounding machine next to an offensive board attacking, layup rejecting beast.
After seven players, my rankings, including stats from their ten most recent games are:
1. MKG – Â Â Â Â Â Â 31.4 m, 9.4 p, 7.1 r, 1.5 a, 0.9 s, 0.8 b, 1.7 to, 56% TS
2. Robinson –Â Â 32.3 m, 16.7 p, 11.2 r, 2.7 a, 1.1 s, 0.5 b, 3.0 to, 52% TS
3. Drummond – 30.4 m, 10.3 p, 7.7 r, 0.2 a, 0.7 s, 3.1 b, 0.8 to, 50% TS
4. Barnes –Â Â Â Â 32.4 m, 16.2 p, 5.6 r, 0.9 a, 1.1 s, 0.3 b, 2.1 to, 50% TS
5. Jones III –Â Â Â 29.1 m, 12.1 p, 7.9 r, 1.3 a, 0.5 s, 0.5 b, 1.1 to, 50% TS
6. Lamb – Â Â Â Â Â 37.8 m, 19 p, 5.7 r, 1.5 a, 0.7 s, 0.5 b, 1.3 to, 59% TS
7. Miller – Â Â Â Â Â 22.7 m, 7.3 p, 4.8 r, 1.0 a, 0.5 s, 0.4 b, 1.5 to, 44% TS
Kevin,
Maybe I was a little ahead of myself when I compared Morrow favorably to him, but I’m happy someone agrees that Barnes will be an average to slightly above average NBA player.
Derrick,
I agree. He doesn’t create well for himself or others. I’m not sold on his defense or his rebounding. I think he’s better than Anthony Morrow.
Tonight game solidifies my opinion on Barnes. He is just a spot up jump-shooter. He can’t create his own shot. He doesn’t drive the rim. He’s an average athlete. I wouldn’t draft him in top ten. I don’t see much upside with him. He just isn’t aggressive, and I don’t think that’s something you can improve. He just doesn’t have the it factor that top 3 picks should have. I just don’t see him being better than players like Danny Granger, Marvin Williams, or even Anthony Morrow.
Again, Henson would absolutely fit with TT. Also, I believe in drafting guys that have unique physical attributes. That’s why Beal does nothing for me but Henson does. He has size, first of all and freakish wing span. And he has an offensive game that will develop into a real compliment to TT as Henson’s face up jumper will only get better and better. Not to mention how unbelievably good we’d be defensively in the paint. That is kind of important, no?
I wouldn’t mind a big, but there really aren’t many who would fit well with TT. A Zeller bro might work, but Cody is probably staying another year and Tyler quite on the same level as the players that will be available in the 6-9 range. Like HD mentioned, there aren’t a whole lot of good SG/SF in the league right now. Name 3 good, young SGs in the league (Harden, maybe Monta Ellis, and…um…Paul George?) It could be even worse at SF (aside from Durant you have Gallinari and Batum?). If we can get a good wing like Barnes,… Read more »
Nice recap. I don’t mind a big with the first pick, but honestly unless we win the lottery and get Davis, I don’t understand why you’d get a big when this draft is deep with 4s, and the league is deep with 4s. There’s simply more scarcity when it comes to wings (especially long, athletic ones), and thus they should currently be valued higher. If we could get a legit 5 with range, would I understand going big.
It looks like Rivers will declare for the draft… I’d be fine with the Double Duke backcourt Jimbo.
Is there a decent chance that we could move up to somewhere around 20ish and pick up Rivers there, in addition to our own top 10 pick?
There are several guys that I really love entering the NBA next season…regardless of position: Davis, Barnes, Beal, MKG, Robinson and Lamb.
Think there are some other awesome PROSPECTS like Jones, Miller, Rivers, and Drummond…but I think my top 6 are above…the PROSPECTS have amazing talents, but don’t seem to be ready to step in right away like the first group.
Also, the Cavs need to be careful with the salary and who they might overpay…that’s going to impact our draft as well.
Exciting time to be a Cavs fan!
How about a Double Duke backcourt of Rivers and Irving?
Thats great news wether we are bad enough to get him or not. At the very least, this gives us a better chance of getting someone like brad beal.
^ Yeah… I kinda want to tank now too…
Kidd-Gilchrist declares for draft. Tank city, tank tank city. Please.