On the Cavs and the crippling inevitability of failure
2010-06-23The 2nd half of Season 3 of The Wire was recently available On Demand; hence, I ended up finishing season 3 of The Wire (for the second or third time) tonight.
(WARNING: MAJOR THE WIRE SPOILERS AHEAD. IF YOU DO NOT WATCH THE WIRE, I AM JEALOUS OF YOU. YOU WILL SOON GET TO WATCH THE WIRE FOR THE FIRST TIME. AND YES, IT IS THAT GOOD. I WOULD TELL YOU IF IT WASN’T. I’M A VERY CYNICAL PERSON. WATCH IT. WATCH IT NOW.)
Season three of The Wire is the kind of program that inspires hope even if you know things will ultimately end badly. Stringer Bell founds the Baltimore drug co-op and comes achingly close to making drug dealing a murder-free business. Bunny Colvin creates Hamsterdam, the open-air drug market that cleans up drug corners and, again, comes achingly close to making drug dealing a murder-free business. McNulty comes achingly close to actually catching Stringer Bell on the wire. Heck, the B+B Crew come achingly close to gunning down Marlowe. Season 3 of The Wire pulls off what few other “topical” pieces of entertainment ever have; not only does it make the case that a major institution is broken, but it actually lays out realistic ways to make that institution less broken. (Heck, Traffic is one of my favorite movies, and all that movie does is do the former well. And most of the Zeta-Jones scenes should have been cut. Moving on.)
But even as we see these potential solutions materialize, we know, deep down, that these solutions will not work. (For the first 3.5 seasons of The Wire, we knew that the solutions wouldn’t work because we knew that we were being given a window into how bureaucracy prevents positive change from happening. In the last 1.5 seasons of The Wire, we knew that the solutions wouldn’t work because we knew we were watching a show about how bureaucracy prevents positive change from happening.)
At its best, The Wire reminds us that we are dealing with an institution that is fundamentally broken. There are no good guys or bad guys; there is simply a city without the ability to sustain itself, and a system that promotes self-interest over trying to help a city sustain itself.
This feeling of inevitable failure brings me to the institution of the LeBron-era Cleveland Cavaliers. To clarify, I am not trying to tap into the “God hates Cleveland Sports” thing here. While that is certainly something I have felt and a reason I shout “okay, nobody do anything stupid” at the TV when the Cavs are up eight with six seconds to play, it’s not what I’m getting at right now.
The post-LeBron Cavs are, fundamentally, a broken institution. They blew their chance to add an impact player in the lottery before LeBron led them to the playoffs, they never managed their cap well enough to grab a major free agent, and they never had the assets to trade for a second All-Star. They have done what they can to put the best talent they can around LeBron, and for the most part they’ve done a wonderful job. But it’s still been LeBron and the best The Island of Misfit Toys has to offer — tell me adding Shaq to a drive-and-kick team built around defense wasn’t as outlandish a concept as Hamsterdam.
Could this all have been different? Of course. The Cavs could’ve taken somebody other than Luke Jackson with their lone post-LeBron lottery pick. They could’ve not risked giving up a lottery pick for JIRI FREAKING WELSCH. JIRI FREAKING WELSCH. They could’ve resisted giving Larry Hughes all that money. They could’ve pulled the trigger on the Shaq deal during the year they actually faced Orlando in the playoffs. Hell, maybe Phoenix could’ve kept Rajon Rondo’s draft rights instead of selling them to free up the money necessary to sign Marcus Banks. Maybe Rashard Lewis misses one of those two threes he made. Whatever it was that happened, LeBron’s Cavaliers were a fundamentally broken team who came achingly close to making it work a couple of times.
My 2nd Wire/Cavs point is this: despite the fact that the Wire is a terrifyingly depressing show on a macro level, it manages to be downright inspiring on a micro level. Every season ends with a montage of the majority of the major characters featured, and a lot of them are shown finding their own individual happy endings.
With your permission, I’m going to play this game for a second: imagine that the 09-10 Cavs weren’t a giant, fundamentally broken system whose sole goal was to win a championship and whose sole relevant agent was LeBron James. Judge them like any other team, not one who had crippling pressure put upon them all season because of one player and like a team that whose success wasn’t defined by the legacy of that one player.
If you did that, you might see things like:
— Delonte West fighting through his depression and playing nearly a full season of NBA basketball, and keeping his status as the one player on the team who never quit under any circumstances
— Anderson Varejao finally getting recognized for what his defense, rebounding, and energy has always brought to this team
— Anthony Parker going from playing in Israel to being the starting shooting guard on a 61-win NBA team
— J.J. Hickson emerging as a solid starter, intriguing athlete, and potential future star
— Antawn Jamison finally getting the chance to prove he belongs with the big boys
— Zydrunas Ilgauskas proving that NBA basketball isn’t just about the money
— Daniel Gibson never letting the fact that the Cavs didn’t ask enough of him keep him from doing what the team did ask him to do
— Leon Powe getting an ovation from a Celtics crowd that desperately wanted the Cavaliers to go down
— Jamario Moon going from Globetrotter to the man who played a huge part in helping the Cavs take a playoff game against the Bulls
— Jawad Williams proving he belongs in the NBA
There were those stories, and so many more. Those players’ job wasn’t to make sure LeBron James got his glory. It was to do the best they could to help the Cavs win, and they all did that. More than that, they all deserve the adoration that’s due to them. These are men who played great basketball and took this team pretty darn far, all things considered. They were more than LeBron’s elves. And that means something. I’m not sure what, but it does mean something. I suppose that’s all I can really say on this matter for the time being.
Awesome article man, really puts some forgotten parts of this year into perspective.
@rich
not be a an “i told ya so” but the “chris paul never being traded thing” is not looking so good right now. borussard and (the admittedly awful) woj have both written saying paul is open to a trade, etc. oh and in case yr wondering, yes, woj manages to take shots at LBJ and his team in his article about chris paul. almost impressive his capt ahab -like obsession…
@Colin:
Yeah, things are going fine.
And we still got spelling, yo. Cleveland is the friggin’ spelling center of the USA. We’re a spelling town now. The spelling champions of the world.
And hey, maybe the Browns will be good this year, right?
…Right?
There’s a cricket-chirping problem in here. Someone should deal with that.
@Ben – glad you said it and not me.
I agree about Mo Williams. I also think the Cavs used him improperly. He is devastating off the ball. Nobody on Boston ever asks Ray Allen to run the point. The Cavs made him handle the ball and try to score against tough defenses – should have run LBJ at the point and let Mo spot up IMO.
NBA success is judged by team success, its the job of the top player to bring out the best in his team and Lebron simply didn’t do that. They lost and that’s all that matters.
Guys, lets try and cheer ourselves up a bit here. The US won their freaking group! Did anyone watch the game today? Most intense 90+ minutes of a sport I’ve seen in a long, long time.
Has Bethlehem Shoals jumped the shark? Is he just a less funny, less comprehensible version of Bill Simmons now? I used to read FD everyday and follow him at his other sites, but lately I’d rather read the US Federal Code end to end.
The Cavs did wind up doing pretty well this year, huh?
And just sayin’- Mo dunking on top of Paul Pierce was the highlight of these playoffs as far as I’m concerned.
Uh oh, Mo said in an interview with Windy that he’s “confident” that the Cavs will re-sign LeBron. We remember what happened last time Mo said he was confident about something.
I like Mo on O, he’s great, and I feel for him, but to be elite we need someone in the backcourt who can play serious D as well on the likes of Rondo+Allen, Nelson, Rose, Jennings and maybe (soon) Wall.
With Delonte AWOL we expected too much from Parker to cover his ass very playoff game. Just not gonna happen.
I wish we could make a serious run at Allen.
how about boozer? couldn’t the management have handled it a little better? boozer is better than any other players they brought in.
By far the best article on the Cavs I’ve read since they got knocked out.
Re: Mo. I think when people complain about him, they fail to consider how hard his job with the Cavs is. He’s basically playing two positions simultaneously on offense and guarding one of the toughest positions in the league on defense.
@rich
agreed. well said…
Also, Mo is a player with some actual value in this league who just put his kneck on the line and basically said he wanted to be here, w/ or w/o a commitment from LeBron. No one else out there seems to be able to make that leap, and Mo did. There is nothing to do but respect the guy for that.
@rich
i had the same reaction when i read mo’s tweet. it’s hard not to like him. his failings are never due to effort and i still think he can turn into a more clutch performer. but it may just be the sentimental side of me talking here…
Don’t forget the Boozer fiasco. Imagine if Boozer had stuck around.
The Mo tweet is touching tbh. The guy has heart. The guy actually wants to be in Cleveland, and despite the bad press, the guy can actually play. If a great deal comes along, you have to do it. But we better not trade Mo just for the sake of doing something. Athletes who actually want to be in Cleveland are few and far between. Let’s not just randomnly run the ones out of town who do.
Love the post. Its about time somebody gave credit to some of the lesser role players on the cavs and what they meant to the team. Remember: Daniel Gibson was once our sixth man and was a MAJOR reason we went to the finals in 07. He bailed out lebron and co. and was our best guard in the series. He was reduced to peanuts this year but still produced when asked. About 470 from beyond the arc???? really???? and when he was the emergency starting point guard this year he was simply fantastic. The love Cleveland showed Z proves… Read more »
Holy smokes did anyone see Mo’s latest tweet?
mogotti2
Pls don’t trade me, I’m not ready to go. I’m begging. My work ain’t done yet. I’m on both knees….pls. I’m serious
Wire Season 3 Spoiler comment: with 8 days left until the inevitable 7-1-10, I’m hoping the run of Cavs and LBJ doesn’t end the same way of Barksdale and Stringer, both sides knowing the ride was great, but that in the interest of business, the end had come…. that roof scene was crazy
Yeah, I think it was Kurtz who almost killed Marlowe.
Great post, love the wire, I assume you meant to write “Marlo” instead of “Marlowe.” Cheers.
Keeping with The Wire analogy, the Cavs performance against Boston, specifically them freaking quitting at the end, would be like watching an episode where McNulty takes an envelope full of cash from Stringer, then watch Bunk take a bullet in the back of the head.
Not saying the Cavs are “dirty”, but my level of shock/dissapointment would be about the same.
Nice work John. Love the blog, love the Wire, love a lot of the guys on this team. I hate the fact this team could get gutted because of LeBron either staying or going. Players like Delonte and Z are the soul of the team and it will be hard to watch the Cavs if they’re gone next year. Thinking of the next few weeks depresses me as much as waiting for the inevitable England defeat whichs kicks off in the next hour or so. By the way, have you guys in the States seen ‘Luther’ yet? It was an… Read more »