The Point Four-ward: Looking (Somewhat Ambitiously) Ahead
2015-04-08Four points I’m thinking about the Cleveland Cavaliers…
1.) J.R. Smith’s three point explosion against the Chicago Bulls on Sunday (8-17 FGs… all three pointers) had many Cavs fans on Twitter talking about the team’s starting two guard and his contract status. After all, Smith has a player option for just under $6.4 million for next season. If he were playing like he was as a member of the New York Knicks earlier this season, Smith likely would have picked up that option. And, right now, $6.4 million for the type of production Smith is providing is a bargain.
In Cleveland, Smith has thrived and the team has thrived with him. Cavs head coach David Blatt has referred to Smith as “a godsend” and LeBron James has said the 6-8 Smith has been “everything we needed and more.”
Derek Fisher, Smith’s former coach in New York, said that Cleveland’s roster has allowed Smith to excel by being more of a catch-and-shoot player than a playmaker, a role in which he struggled to play for the Knicks this year. And it’s true that when Smith has shot the ball well from deep, the Cavs have looked darned near unstoppable. That all adds up to a player who, at 29 years old, will probably be looking to capitalize on all of the public adoration showered on him by the Cavs by turning it into a long-term — and much more lucrative — deal.
But is tying up a ton of money in Smith really a smart move for the Cavs going forward?
2.) The Cavs are going to have plenty of roster questions to answer after the season.
A lot can change between now and the free agency period, but assuming Smith does, in fact, opt out of his deal, the Cavs will have to deal with his free agency along with the expected free agencies of Kevin Love, the possible free agency of LeBron James and the restricted free agencies of Tristan Thompson and Iman Shumpert. Mike Miller will likely pick up his $2.85 million player option, Shawn Marion will retire and, if I were to guess right now, I’d say that the team finds some money to re-sign James Jones, the patron saint of good locker room guys, to a cost-effective deal.
The salary cap is about to increase significantly, so that will allow the Cavs to spend a bit more to keep this season’s successful rotation together before they are plunged fully into salary cap hell — and there’s always the chance that Thompson and/or Shumpert could wind up playing out their contract on the qualifying offer in order to become fully unrestricted free agents the following summer.
Still, what is Smith worth to the Cavs? If you were Dan Gilbert, would you pay him $9 million a year? If you were David Grffin, would you feel good about offering Smith $10 million a year? And at what point does a player’s value to a particular team start to bring his price down in regards to other teams around the league?
Barring an epic post-season slump that shoots the Cavs out of several games, though, expect the Smith to get paid. After struggling to fit Dion Waiters into the starting (or backup) shooting guard role for the past two years, the seamlessness with which Smith has fit in (at least thus far) is worth the Cavs keeping him here for the remainder of his prime.
3.) While many of you were probably watching Duke play Wisconsin in the NCAA Championship Game on Monday night, I had the opportunity to watch the Brooklyn Nets take on the Portland Trailblazers at the Barclay Center in Brooklyn, NY. This game was originally scheduled for back in January, but was canceled by the threat of a coming Snow-pacalypse (that never came) and rescheduled for this week.
I watched the game with a bit more of a rooting interest than I’d normally bring to a late-season Nets/Blazers match-up. The Nets, after all, should they continue winning could hold on to the seventh seed in the Eastern Conference playoffs and set up a meeting with the likely second-seeded Cleveland Cavaliers. I’d actually get to catch two Cavs playoff games in my local viewing area. In my book, that’s worth a few claps for Deron Williams and Brook Lopez.
It’s funny, though: when I originally agreed to take the pair of season tickets off the hands of a very generous friend, I thought “Great. I’ll get to see one good team, at least.” I just wasn’t expecting that team to be Brooklyn.
4.) Granted, the Blazers were playing without All-Star forward LeMarcus Aldridge (rest), but the Nets still overcame 36 points from Damian Lillard to win 106-96 and, in doing so, looked like a much feistier potential first round opponent for the Cavs than, perhaps, the seeding (and the Nets play for much of the season) would lead one to expect.
Brook Lopez scored 32 points on 15-25 shooting to go along with nine rebounds and one block for the Nets, who also saw a throwback game from Williams (24 points, 10 assists) and strong contributions from Thaddeus Young (20 points, five boards) and Bojan Bogdanovic (15 points and a team-high +20).
Lopez, in particular, has been on a tear of late, winning the Eastern Conference Player of the Week award for last week. From nba.com:
Lopez led the Nets to a 3-1 week behind team-leading averages of 20.8 points (sixth in the conference), 10.3 rebounds (fourth in the conference) and 2.0 blocks (tied-fifth in the conference). Lopez shot better than 50 percent in all four contests, and ranked seventh in the East for the week with a field goal percentage of 59.4. He recorded two point-rebound double-doubles, including a 30-point, 17-rebound outing during a 114-109 win over the Toronto Raptors on April 3.
The past few seasons of injuries and disappointing play from Williams and, to a lesser degree, Lopez, along with the future-mortgaging deal that brought in Paul Pierce and Kevin Garnett on the downside of their careers, meant that the championship window never really opened up in the Barclays Center. Still, the Nets have a coach in Lionel Hollins whose time with the Memphis Grizzlies showed that he could get the most out of his roster, as long as that roster was willing to defend and rebound. Hollins now has a mix of youth and experience on his roster. It’s a mixture that may never be great but, if Williams and Lopez are playing up to their potential, can still be deep, versatile and very good.
Hollins got on Lopez earlier in the season for not rebounding enough, something that has always been an issue for the 7-0 big man who, when he’s healthy, may be the best offensive center in the league. While Lopez’s season-long rebounding average (7.3) won’t wow anyone, over the last 10 games he’s averaging a nearly-respectable-f0r-a-seven-footer 8.8 rebounds a game. In the month of April, it’s up to 9.8. If Hollins has finally helped Lopez get over the rebounding hump — and, of course, as long as Lopez remains healthy — the Nets still have a solid building block on their roster.
In a match-up against the Cavs, Lopez’s strong recent play places a greater demand on Timofey Mozgov, who may actually see some fourth quarter minutes as the Nets are unlikely to try to beat the Cavs by going small. If the Nets get Mozgov into foul trouble, that would certainly ratchet up the degree of difficulty for the wine and gold.
I’m still of the opinion that many may be scared off by JR’s penchant for goofiness without strong vets around and when he’s not in contract years.
I can live without TT and Shump; while I like them both they seem replaceable. JR seems tough to replace
Just depends on what you need. TT’s skill set is basically a replica of AV (even though TT is six years younger than AV and not injury prone like AV). There are lots of guys out there with the same skill set that could be a TT replacement for less $$ (although none that are repped by #Klutch sports). Shump’s is a somewhat harder skill set to find (perimeter defensive stopper) and the Cavs seem to covet that talent as most championship teams have such a player on their roster. JR seems tougher to replace because when he’s on, he’s… Read more »
I think JR’s skill set will age very well. And he gives us a 3rd guy who can take over a game which is pretty tough on defenses. Kind of a Ray Allen type but less consistent. Seems worth a 4 year deal if you can trade the length of the guaranteed contract for a lower yearly figure.
Fun “awards” article from Haberstroh today. KLove won “Most TD Passes” and JFJ won “Most Dependent” In a mild surprise, LBJ did not win “Most Dribble Happy” Kyrie did not win “Biggest Ball Hog” and Andrew Wiggins won “Biggest Loser”
http://espn.go.com/nba/insider/story/_/id/12644724/the-2014-15-haberstrophy-awards-nba
It’s been brought up before, but I wonder if the Cavs try to figure out some sort of contract re-work for AV in exchange for some future front office employment opportunities to give them more flexibility with the other guys. It’s going to be fascinating to see how far the Cavs get in the playoffs correlates to what they will have to/be willing to spend in the off-season. Gotta believe that DG won’t repeat the sins of Mickey Arison and be cost-conscious at this juncture. Although, there’s definitely some overlap with AV and TT, as well as JR and Shump.… Read more »
I want to say that you can’t rework a constract once it’s signed. They’d need Andy to retire.
Yeah, you’re right, although doesn’t this seem like the kind of wrinkle the NBA would/should adopt? I could see him maybe agreeing to retire in the third year of the contract since the money’s not guaranteed in 17-18 if his injuries persist. But that won’t help the Cavs next year.
Stretch pay buyout and retire…
I’ve read through the luxury tax and salary cap stuff before and get the gist of it. So why are we so worried about being able to pay everyone if we’re assuming Dan Gilbert is serious about his willingness to spend any amount of money to keep successful basketball in Cleveland? All I can tell is that being above the apron is restrictive of sign-and-trades and salary cap exemptions. Considering we have the pieces needed to contend for the foreseeable future, it’s not like we’ll be hurting to bring in new guys. Aging vets will continue to sign on for… Read more »
I think you’re right that it’s mainly Gilbert’s wallet that’s at stake. But even he must have his limits.
If the Cavs get to a point where they’re looking at being $20 million over the cap, which would mean paying about $65 million in tax as a repeater, I have to think Gilbert would ask his basketball people to at least show him options for reducing the payroll. Is Shumpert, for instance, worth $8 million-$10 million a year if his salary adds $25 million-$30 million a year to the tax bill?
Yep. ^ THIS. Gilbert’s willing to pay, but every man has a limit to what he’s willing to pay. I could also envision him being more willing to pay BEFORE we win a title, and still willing to pay after we win one but not as much so. Last part is just my opinion though.
We need to be under the cap for 2 straight years? Sorry I missed that. That will be tough.
I wonder if there’s a way to structure these new coming contracts so that we can drop slightly under the tax for one season during the 2016-17 cap jump and then push past it again after that? For my money JR is much more important than Tristan. I know there’s office politics involved, but I bet Lebron will make it known he wants to keep JR around. They’ll figure it out.
“I am enjoying myself more here than anywhere I’ve been,” said Smith, 29, an 11-year pro. “I want to be here, hopefully we can have the same team next year if everything goes well.” -J.R. Smith
http://www.cleveland.com/cavs/index.ssf/2015/03/jr_smith_lebron_james_clevelan.html
Also, great article on Blatt pushing a narrative I wish was picked up by the national media more ardently.
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2420492-david-blatt-isnt-lebrons-puppet-hes-a-coach-of-the-year-candidate
Also, here’s a thorough explanation of how the luxury tax and repeater tax work: http://www.cbafaq.com/salarycap.htm#Q21
I predict we’d beat the Nets in 5 games. As for the roster/salary cap concerns, it certainly is possible that J.R. Smith may price himself out of our range. Cavs are currently $5,415,423 over the luxury tax threshold for this year. (http://www.spotrac.com/nba/cleveland-cavaliers/cap/). Currently, the repeater tax is levied against any team that has paid the luxury tax in all three previous seasons. Not yet a concern for us as this is our first season in awhile paying the luxury tax. However, starting next season, the repeater tax will be charged to any team paying in three of the previous four… Read more »
The great thing is we have Gilbert, so no worries about a willingness to spend over the cap. I don’t know if they will get JR back, but we will have the Big 3 back plus Timmy and Shump and probably Thompson.
If we face the Nets it’s an easy sweep. But then so are any of the teams that could be the first round matchup.
Cavs will have salary headaches this year. The cap increase does not kick in till 2016-2017.
From what I hear, a lot of teams might be willing to pay the luxury tax next year because the cap will skyrocket in 2017 and most teams will be under the nex tax line with current contracts. Idk if the cavs are over the tax this year but if we aren’t, we should just pay the luxury tax next year and lock up guys to deals that will look a lot better once the cap explodes. Not sure how stringent the repeater tax is. Its also not my money. Another thing to hope for (but not plan for) is… Read more »
We are presently over the tax, and will be over the tax next year as well, so we’ll get the repeater. The question isn’t whether we’ll be over the cap and tax, its how far. Thompson, Shump, and, pehaps, J.R., basically have us over a barrel. It doesn’t matter what their market value is, because we can’t replace them with like-talented players. We have to resign our own guys or replace them with Vet minimums. We still have the Haywood chip, but we’re out of picks to trade. Thompson, Shump, and J.R., are going to get PAID.
You don’t pay the repeater tax for being over the cap in consecutive years. See my post below or go to http://www.cbafaq.com/salarycap.htm#Q21 for a full explanation.
Maybe everyone will opt-in and take the Spursian route of less money for more rings. And we can save our headache for next season when it will be dulled by the cap explosion. Here’s to hoping for a miracle.
Well… you know LBJ ain’t having any part of anything less than the max every year for the rest of his career from his comments last summer. I wouldn’t be surprised if he was on a year to year max until he retires.
For all of the great moves the front office made this past year… the best might have been locking Kyrie up to a long term deal that will look like peanuts by the end…
Agree with everything you said in this post, EG.
I hope Kyrie doesn’t hold it against them. Maybe he can he walk over to Gilbert’s casino after games to make some extra coin as a greeter.