From the Desk of Eli and Chris (or, the Wing Obsession)

From the Desk of Eli and Chris (or, the Wing Obsession)

2022-06-04 Off By Chris Francis

Eli and Chris are back again, this time armed with their top 20 draft boards and a plea to President of Basketball Operations Koby Altman: Find a wing at all costs. Clearly the talk among Cavs’ fans is how the organization can improve their play on the perimeter with size and skill. Fear not, Eli and Chris have some ideas on how to improve the talent level at that spot. Without further ado…

Eli’s Top 20

1. Jabari Smith
2. Paolo Banchero
3. Jaden Ivey
4. Chet Holmgren
5. Keegan Murray
6. Dyson Daniels
7. AJ Griffin
8. Shaeden Sharpe
9. Johnny Davis
10. Tari Eason
11. Ousmane Dieng
12. Malaki Branham
13. Benn Mathurin
14. Jeremy Sochan
15. Ochai Agbaji
16. Kendall Brown
17. Tyty Washington
18. Nikola Jovic
19. E.J. Liddell
20. Mark Williams

Chris’ Top 20

1. Jabari Smith
2. Paolo Banchero
3. Jaden Ivey
4. Dyson Daniels
5. Tari Eason
6. Malaki Branham
7. Jalen Williams
8. Keegan Murray
9. AJ Griffin
10. Benn Mathurin
11. Johnny Davis
12. Christian Braun
13. TyTy Washington
14. Ochai Agbaji
15. Jake LaRavia
16. Mark Williams
17. Wendell Moore Jr.
18. Kennedy Chandler
19. Jalen Duren
20. Chet Holmgren

Players that Eli and Chris Like More than the Consensus

Eli: Given that this is a Cavs’ board, some of the rankings aren’t going to line up. The Cavs really do not need a center with this pick, lowering players like Duren and Mark Williams (hot take, I think Mark Williams should easily be the first center taken).

In addition, I am not as concerned about a ball dominant player so to some extent, the lead ball-handlers take a bit of hit in my Cavs Big Board (think Kennedy Chandler, TyTy Washington).

If there is anything that we can learn year after year with the NBA Draft and true contenders, it’s that playmaking, shooting, and defense are the key components of teams that are far into the playoffs. The true superstars are the players who can provide exceptional play in these key aspects (IE Doncic, Steph, Jimmy Butler).

For me, the player I think I am higher on than most is Dyson Daniels. The Aussie played in the G-League Ignite team and grew, both literally and his skillset. As the year went on, Daniels showed much more comfort in being the lead playmaker at times while having good defensive chops. Now measuring at nearly 6 foot 8, the 19 year old player is versatile, likely being able to play 1-3 in the league. Daniels would immediately help the playmaking and defense while improving his jumpshot. Although Daniels shot 25.5% from deep in the G-League, his mid 70% free throw rate is an encouraging indicator that his jump shot is not completely broken.

Another player worth mentioning is Tari Eason. The combo-forward fouls a ton but ironically, Eason shot 35% from deep and 80% from the FT line. His steal and block rates are outstanding, indicating an immediate defensive-minded player which could help Cleveland sustain the top 5 defensive rating from last year. Eason is also climbing up the consensus boards, and with good reason. Eason may be one of the worst luck players, having been a bench player for LSU and being utilized mostly as a big man. His athleticism was under-utilized and a team that sees a little more potential in him may be able to unlock a switchy, good-enough shooter (despite the trebuchet motion).

Chris: As one can plainly tell from looking at my perhaps “controversial” board, Eli and I are of the same mind regarding what wins in the NBA: playmaking, shooting, and defense. As I examined the Cavs’ offense from this past season, there’s clearly two areas where they need to improve: pick and roll playmaking and jump shooting. There are two players that would bring immediate improvement to those two areas, which is why I view them as top 10 prospects: Malaki Branham and Jalen Williams.

I’ve already spilled some ink on Malaki Branham in our draft preview, but it’s worth it to mention that Bleacher Report’s Jonathan Wasserman reported to cleveland.com’s Chris Fedor that Branham was an elite pick and roll player in his freshman year at Ohio State, grading out in the top 10th percentile among all NCAA players in scoring efficiency. Couple that with a roughly 40% in three point catch and shoot attempts and you literally have the perfect prospect to help the Cavs where they’re the weakest. The only people who’d be against this move are the fans who are holding out hope that Collin Sexton or Caris LeVert demonstrate massive improvement over their poor 2021-22 season performances for the Cavs.

There is legitimate concern that Branham’s defense isn’t good, however the thing to remember about Branham is that he’s a very young prospect (just turning 19 years old at the time of the draft). There’s plenty of time for him to add NBA strength to his 6’5″ frame and nearly seven foot wingspan.

This is where Jalen Williams comes in. Williams is riding a massive wave of hype after a showstopping performance at the NBA combine in Chicago a few weeks ago. He’s gone from a second round talent to a possible mid-lottery prospect after demonstrating elite athleticism in combine testing and dominating scrimmages against other NBA prospects. He’s a player who can score efficiently (57.8% career true shooting), make plays (17.9% career assist rate), defend (4.1% career stocks rate), and make good decisions with the ball in his hands (12.7% career turnover rate). Putting the production and testing together, and it’s easy to see why there’s so much hype surrounding the Santa Clara product. The biggest knock on Williams’ resume is the fact that he did play against terrible competition in the West Coast Conference, but check out what he did to Chet Holmgren:

Players Eli and Chris are completely out on

Eli: The player I am most out on, especially for the Cavs, is Patrick Baldwin Jr. PBJ, who may have eaten too many of the favorite NBA snack, has fallen off a cliff since being a top 5 recruit in his high school class.

Baldwin Jr. went to play for his dad and hypothetically should have dominated at Milwaukee. Instead, he flopped, averaging 12.1 PPG, 5.8 RPG, and 1.5 APG on 34% shooting from the field. Add to the fact that the Cleveland media member with the most insight shares his thoughts of him possibly being “soft”, I am WAY out on PBJ.

To further hurt his status as well, PBJ posted HORRIBLE numbers at the combine, including a 26.5 inch vertical. Cleveland should stay away and not have him on the draft board at all.

Another player I am not interested in at all despite being a top-10 player on most boards is Jalen Duren. Duren is really young and has an old-school post game. His vision is also pretty good for a center but I just don’t see a top-tier NBA skillset. His athleticism doesn’t wow me as a rim-running or rim-protector and his shot isn’t reliable enough to be a legitimate stretch big. Secretly, I am hoping a team does fall in love with him, giving the Cavs more options at 14.

Chris: There’s obviously two massive names missing from my board compared to the consensus: Ousmane Dieng (much to the chagrin of Eli) and Shaedon Sharpe.

With Ousmane Dieng, I’m firmly convinced that his name being place in the lottery conversation is a media troll job. The dude put up garbage numbers in the NBL in Australia, a league that is supposedly the equivalent of a top five college conference in terms of competitive quality in spite of having fully grown adult players. The biggest red flag for Dieng besides being a bricklayer (sub 40% shooter) is the fact he’s a 6’10” guy who doesn’t rebound. He averages less than six rebounds per 36 minutes in the NBL. There’s perfectly legitimate reasons to take a project player at 14, but good players produce on the court. Dieng has done nothing but stink on a basketball court.

With Shaedon Sharpe, the hype is equally as puzzling. He hasn’t played competitive basketball in over a year and he’s being considered a possible top five prospect? Truly insane. And when he had the chance to participate in the combine scrimmages did he take on the challenge? Apparently not. Call me old-fashioned, but I like players who like to play basketball and like to compete. Dawgs and hoopers only, Koby.

What do you think?

The NBA draft is a mere 20 days away, and the consensus board will probably shift as there’s more intel regarding private workouts. So Commentariat, should the Cavs be “all-in” on finding a two way wing? Or should the Cavs be open to taking a point guard or center should one fall into their laps? Sound off below!

P.S.

Can’t use the Wings’ logo without a little tribute, so enjoy…

Share