5 on 5: Cavs’ Draft
2013-06-06There are just less than three weeks remaining till the 2013 draft. Are we really going to have enough time to talk about all these picks? That’s only 14 more posts! We’re running out of time to plot wins shares per high top fade hairstyles versus low fades with respect to #1 overall draft picks, adjusting for position and age! What about projected NBA PER for players whose surnames start with J who were born in monsoon season during the year of the rat? These are questions that need answering!
Screw it. Let’s just pick now. Here are the CtB staffers with their votes for the #1, #19, #31, and #33 picks, and a draft day trade they’d like to see.
With the first pick of the NBA Draft, the Cleveland Cavaliers select…
Robert Attenweiler: Nerlens Noel, 6-11, PF/C, Kentucky. At the end of the day, I think Noel both makes the most sense for this pick and is enough of a reach that Chris Grant can keep his “Wacky Uncle Chris” draft day persona going. This pick has got it all: bust potential, defensive anchor potential, great hair potential (already realized!). This is a Chris Grant pick all day long.
Mallory Factor: Otto Porter, 6’7″, SF, Georgetown. I’m going to go with the obvious choice here…no, not that, the other one.  The Cavaliers should select Porter.  I’ll admit, at first I was skeptical, but the boom/bust potential (emphasis on bust) of Noel scares the bajeezas outta me.  As much as this is a big man’s league, time and time again it’s been proven that in order to win, an elite SF is needed (look no further than Paul George). I’m not holding my breath on Lebron. He may come back, he may not.  But the Cavs franchise shouldn’t be held hostage because of him.  Porter is a do-everything player with a good shot and elite D skills. What more could a ball handler-dominant, defensively deficient team ask for?  Nothing. Porter is the no brainer here.  Except for a trade. That’s the real goal.
Tom Pestak: Otto Porter, 6’7″, SF, Georgetown. The Cavs have drafted the guy they considered best player available (BPA) for the last 2 seasons. Â They most certainly did not draft for need, nor did they consider value added when you realize that adding a B+ power forward when you have a C+ power forward and an A- power forward playing center (out of position) adds less value than drafting a legitimate center to replace Ryan Hollins. Â So now what? Â Noel could be the BPA (along with 15 other prospects) and most certainly plays a position of need – so I guess it’s a no brain-er? Â Oh just one more thing: How much value does Nerlens add over the six other centers that will go in the 1st to early 2nd round? Â It’s safe that he’ll be good at one thing: altering shots. Â Jeff Withey will give you that in the 2nd round. Â I’ve come full circle on this, but I’m going Otto Porter. It’s not a home run. Â I think Anthony Bennett is the BPA, but the Cavs can not draft another power forward (or undersized player, or guy that doesn’t try on defense). Â Mike Brown’s gonna turn Porter into an elite defender and if the Cavs are ever going to get past Paul George and/or Paul Pierce, much less the unholy one, they’re gonna need some freaking perimeter D.
Kevin Hetrick: Nerlens Noel. I have already beaten this topic to a bloody frickin’ pulp. Noel, but with trepidation about the two left knee surgeries.
Nate Smith: Victor Oladipo, 6’5″(ish), SG/SF, Indiana. I do not want this pick. This is a lot like getting the #1 in fantasy football in a year where there are five or six equally good players, and then knowing you don’t get to pick again till 18 picks later. Actually, it’s exactly like that. Watching clips where Otto Porter runs around looking like Grant Hill (Phoenix Grant Hill, not Detroit Grant Hill), makes me realize he has an old man’s game in a young man’s body. When faced with old man Porter, two centers with leg problems, a low efficiency shooting guard, and an undersized power forward who loafs on defense, Oladipo is the safest choice and the best player available. At the very least, he’s a much more efficient Tony Allen. At best, he has transcendent defensive and finishing abilities: think Andrew Iguodala if he could shoot. Oladipo will fit well with Kyrie and Dion, as he among the best in college at finishing on the break, hitting catch and shoot jumpers, and cutting off the ball. He is good off the dribble, too. To quote Clark Kellogg, “Oladipo is like a baby’s bottom – smooth and sometimes…explosive!”
With the 19th pick of the NBA draft, the Cleveland Cavaliers select…
Mallory: Gorgui Dieng, 6’11”, PF, Louisville. Now that the Cavs have their small forward of the future, it’s time to go after that elusive center.  Assuming Gobert is gone (he will be) the obvious choice is the anti-Zeller – Dieng.  A big, strong bruiser, Dieng is a great defender with adequate offensive skills.  Dieng excels in the pick and roll.  If Andy and Kyrie’s chemistry is any indication, PnR centers are a good fit on this team.  While Dieng’s ceiling isn’t ten stories tall, he’s certainly a solid option for a team lacking in D and pick and roll options.
Tom: Gorgui Dieng. Â Disclaimer: if I was running the Cavs, I’d draft Noel, sit Kyrie every time he gets a headache, and #tankstrong one more year to land a high pick in a not awful draft. Â And then I’d go to work. Â But that’s not the plan, the Cavs want to win now, with a new coach (that notoriously gets off to slow starts), and a bunch of 20-year-olds. Â So Porter and Dieng make so much more sense to me than Noel and a Euro pick. Â Dieng protects the paint without fouling, anchored the #1 D in the NCAA last season, is very athletic, blocks shots well, can finish lobs and such, and has good size for the center position. Â He’s 23 and won’t ever be an all-star, but the Cavs don’t need one at center – they just need someone to play defense and block shots as they’ll be “gettin’ buckets” from the perimeter.
Kevin: Chad Ford’s most recent mock draft has the Cavs taking Sergey Karasev, and I am completely fine with that selection. Allen Crabbe (6′ 5″, SG, California) or Reggie Bullock (6′ 6″, SF, North Carolina) are who I will go with though; variety is the spice of life.  Crabbe’s shooting percentages don’t look great, but he was asked to use 25% of California’s possessions. According to draftexpress, he made 54% of his unguarded catch & shoot threes this season.  Bingo!! Listed as a shooting guard, he is only .5″ shorter and 3 pounds lighter than Bullock, but sports an extra 2.5″ of wingspan. I think either could be a supplement / upgrade to Alonzo Gee as a combo 2 / 3.
Nate: Tony Mitchell, 6’9″, SF/PF, North Texas. Tall, long (7’2″ wingspan), strong (13 bench reps), a good rebounder, a good shotblocker, a good scorer, and a legit 3 prospect, Mitchell is a high risk/high reward pick. After a scintillating freshman year, Mitchell returned to North Texas and had a disastrous sophomore season under former Marquette assistant Tony Benford. Mitchell’s numbers dropped across the board, and he has spent much of his pre-draft time answering questions about consistency and effort after his team went 12-20 this year in the Sun Belt conference. Was he in a horrible situation where he made bad decisions, or is he just a loser? Mitchell’s athleticism is off the charts, and he could project to be a Josh Smith/Paul George type player with some development, or he could be a less talented Hakim Warrick (yikes). With range out past the three point line, he is probably a stretch 4, but Mitchell would allow Brown to give minutes at the three to Mitchell or Oladipo on any given night, depending on matchups. Mitchell has lottery level potential at #19? Take him and pray.
Robert: Rudy Gobert, 7’2″, C, Cholet (France). I don’t think they’ll ultimately be picking here, but I’ll get to that in a few more questions. For now, I’m going to say Gobert. As Nate pointed out earlier this week, Gobert’s a very intriguing player. He’s got great size, seemingly fixable weaknesses, and we’ve just seen another 7’2″ Central Division center tear it up in the playoffs. Would the Cavs pick two offensively raw big men in the same draft? I can see it, especially when one of them might not play most of next season. By this pick in this draft, I can’t see Chris Grant passing on a player he likes because “Eh, we got one of those already.”
With the 31st pick of the NBA draft, the Cleveland Cavaliers select…
Tom: Lucas Nogueira, 6’11”, C, Brazil. Â I’ve seen him as high as 17 so he might not be here at 31, but if he is – great pick for the Cavs. Â He’s 20, is a solid defender, has great size, and has a ton of potential. Â He’s Brazilian and already has wild-thing hair, so he has a solid mentor in Cleveland. Â (The Cavs have Varejao, Z, and now Potapenko…) “Bebe” Noguiera sounds like the perfect big man project while Varejao finishes out his career with the Cavs over the next 4 seasons. Â If he can just slip past the Spurs…
Nate: Giannis Adetokunbo, 6’9″, SF, Greece. As much as I’d love to take Virginia Tech’s Erick Green here, like most mock drafts predict, I just see no way the Cavs can play all four of these picks. So it’s time to stash. Adetokunbo is an intriguing 18 year old prospect with tremendous athleticism and freakishly long fingers which allow for advanced passing and ball handling. Giannis can play any position on the floor, but that’s in a very low level Greek league. He would be completely over-matched as an NBA small forward at his current age. But, if he drops to 31, the Cavs should snag him in a heart beat as he’s an excellent long term prospect.
Robert: Tony Snell, 6’7″, SF, New Mexico. Now, here’s your small forward depth. Snell has ideal height, length and foot speed to project as a solid defender at the position. He’s also got a nice stroke from deep. He struggles putting the ball on the floor, but if you can get a guy in and tell him “Look, the only thing we want you to do is defend and hit corner threes,” Snell is probably better suited for that role long-term than the Cavs’ incumbent 3, Alonzo Gee.
Kevin: Pierre Jackson, 5’10”, PG, Baylor. I could regret this, but… As a general rule, most point guards are not particularly great at defense. Then there are guys like Aaron Brooks that are so horrific that their offensive contributions are definitely cancelled out. Pierre Jackson could be one of those guys. With that as a confidence inspiring intro, I think he can make plays on offense. As a young senior turning 22 in late August, he averaged 20 points and 7 assists per game this year at Baylor. According to statsheet.com, the Bears were plus-275 when he played and minus-33 when he sat.  If the Cavs signs a free agent point guard, and let Jackson teeter between the Big Leagues and the D-League depending on injuries; this is an interesting stab at a future back-up point guard & bench spark-plug. And really, how can you pass on a guy about whom DraftExpress says, “it’s his overall effort and attentiveness on this end of the court that may make it hard to find a spot for him at the next level. Jackson will simply fall asleep off the ball with alarming regularity.” Oh wait, I’m not helping my case. Mike Brown will get him playing defense, right?
Mallory: Reggie Bullock. The hope is that a guy like Bullock falls here.  I wrote about him months ago, but essentially Bullock is the quintessential 3 and D guy.  Long and athletic, Bullock has what it takes to defend NBA swings, with the added value of a sweet stroke. If he’s gone, look for Tony Snell.
With the 33rd Pick of the NBA Draft, the Cleveland Cavaliers Select…
Nate: Mike Muscala, 6’11”, C, Bucknell. As DraftExpress said, “Teams are all over the map on Mike Muscala. Some think he’s a major sleeper. Others don’t think he’s a NBA player at all.” So there’s that. Muscala was one of the country’s best rebounders at 11.3 a game, averaged 2.3 blocks, 2.3 assists, and shot .515/.250/.788 — excellent percentages for a center. His shooting regressed this year from three, probably because of being the focus of defenses, but he shot in the mid 30s from behind the arc the two previous years. Muscala had a 36.1 PER (#2 in the country) this season and his shotblocking and rebounding should translate well to the pros. Muscala did play in the underwhelming Patriot League and had an anemic showing in the tournament, but with passable combine numbers, Muscala is a legit center prospect who is smart and tough and can play both with his back to the basket and as a pick and pop guy. Also, with two Ms for initials, and a Bucknell degree, Mike provides ripe nickname material.
Robert: Glen Rice Jr., 6’6″, SG/SF, Rio Grande Valley (NBDL). Check out the Draft Express video scouting report for Glen Rice Jr. (if you haven’t, like me, done so a dozen or so times already) and you can see some skills there (athleticism, shooting, nasty streak) that, if he’s to be believed, will now be allowed to blossom given his end to bad decision-ing… Aaaaaand his foot speed on defense looks awful. Really, this pick is more about my love of Glen Rice Sr. Picking his son would, in some twisted part of my brain, feel like we were picking the father. And I like him a lot! GR Jr. does not seem to be a Chris Grant pick but, the memory of Glen Sr. whispers in my ear. That might be exactly what makes it a Chris Grant pick. Geez…
Kevin: Grant Jerrett, 6’10”, PF, Arizona. Let’s go out on a limb on this one. Arizona freshman Grant Jerrett was a McDonald’s All-American, ranked 10th in his high school class. Enrolling with two other top-17 freshmen bigs, he was the odd man out for playing time this year. 6’10” tall in shoes, with a 7’2″ wingspan, Jerrett drained 41% of his threes. During combine drills, he shot as well as Bullock and bested Crabbe. Signing Grant for three years with one guaranteed, then sending him on a 2013 – 2014 D-League adventure, may guide him towards becoming a stretch four addition to combine with Noel & Thompson.
Mallory: Deshaun Thomas, 6’7″, PF/SF, Ohio State. Since most second rounders flame out, I hope, for the sake of home-field fandom, that the Cavaliers select Deshaun Thomas. The truth is 9 times out of 10 I hate Thomas’ game, but every once and a while he can light it up.  Throw in some half-decent rebounding, and he’s not a bad stretch 4/SF option.
Tom: Lorenzo Brown, 6’5″, PG, North Carolina State. Well, he’s huge for a point guard, distributes well, racks up steals, can’t shoot much, can’t finish, has no explosiveness, and he’s already 22. Â If we’re gonna witness Mike Brown 2.0, he’s gonna need an Eric Snow 2.0, and that’s Lorenzo Brown. Â Look the Cavs suck because they can’t defend, and even if the young guys start to figure it out under Mike Brown’s tutelage, they are a supremely undersized team. Â So everyone on this list plays D and has good size. Â I look at this draft and see 3 players that could become superstars: Noel, Bennett, and Burke. Â The latter two play positions the Cavs already have filled, and Noel is super risky and not even close to being ready to compete next year (the Cavs stated goal). Â So these guys plug some pretty huge holes in the boat.
We have a trade to announce…
Robert: #31, #33 and a future second round pick for #13 where the Cavs select Jamaal Franklin, 6’5″, SG/SF, San Diego State. If you haven’t read Zach Lowe’s Grantland article about the George Hill for Kawhi Leonard deal it goes something like this: “both teams won and got key pieces to playoff teams,” and then goes on to talk about how Leonard is really, really good. Am I oversimplifying things by picking the guy from Leonard’s alma mater here? Absolutely. I don’t think that Leonard and Franklin are the same type of player. Not necessarily. But I see in Franklin the same potential for future chants of “He was taken way too late! He’s one of the best perimeter defenders in the league already!” These have already become staples among Leonard lovers everywhere.
Kevin: Follow me here. You’re Denver. If Andre Iguodala picks up his option, you’ve got 11 guys signed for $68 million next year. If he doesn’t, the payroll drops to $52 million, but you need to replace him while not having enough cap space to make a sizable free agency offer to a new guy. So, the luxury tax is definitely in play. Even without Iggy, your roster includes Danillo Gallinari and Wilson Chandler, thereby squeezing your 2011 and 2012 first round picks (Jordan Hamilton and Evan Fournier) into some time at shooting guard. Ty Lawson is your 35 minute per game point guard. Andre Miller is your…37 year old, $5 million per year guy that’s pushing you towards the luxury tax and keeping the young guys from seeing the court? If the Nuggets wanted to cut salary, while giving Miller’s minutes to a combination of Fournier and a cheaper back-up point guard…perhaps the Cavs could trade #31 for him. Miller could spend his twilight years where he began while mentoring Kyrie and being a lot of fun to watch.
Tom: The Cavs trade #1 and filler for Deandre Jordan and Eric Bledsoe. Â Jordan is crazy overpaid and redundant so the Cavs are doing the Clips a favor and Bledsoe will be a star very soon (but don’t tell the Clippers).
Mallory: The goal, in my mind, has always been Kevin Love. Â I can’t think of another player, especially given the skills of Kyrie and Dion, that compliments this team better. Of those three, Love is the best shooter off the ball. Â Not only that, he can roll to the basket, and he’s a great rebounder. Â The front office should do just about everything in their power to acquire the disgruntled PF. The thinking: the two first rounders this year, a couple future firsts, and some combo of either roster junk (Zeller, Gee, Miles, etc) or TT. Â The Wolves are likely going to lose Love in the future, and this is probably the best offer that comes along. Â Who says no?
Nate: I pitched the following trade to the guys at Valley of the Sun: the #1 pick, and Tyler Zeller for the #5, Marcin Gortat, and Jared Dudley. I got split responses from the Suns’ bloggers.
Michael Schwartz: I don’t think that trade would be very attractive to the Suns. There isn’t a whole lot of differentiation between the top five or so picks this year, and those are two of the Suns’ only attractive players…. Perhaps they fall in love with a prospect like Noel, but save that I don’t think they would do something like this.
Ryan Weisert: The Suns would do that in a heartbeat. I like that trade for the Cavs too. Puts them in a position to get Oladipo and a veteran center. How vigorously are the Cavs shopping the pick? I agree about Oladipo [being the best pick of the draft].
Nate Smith: Surprised you’d make that trade with your opinion that Oladipo is the best guy. I think the Cavs are looking for veterans. They want to make the playoffs next year, and not add a ton of salary. This is why Dudley/Gortat makes so much sense. Gortat’s on his last year of his contract. The general opinion there is he hates it, right? Dudley is a nice player but he’s a finishing piece, not a building block.
RW:Â Agree on Dudley. Gortat doesn’t hate it, he is just in Steve Nash withdrawal. He is used to being in contention and getting easy by keys off pick and roll. That didn’t really happen with Dragic. In response to the trade, the Suns would definitely do that. If I were in charge, I would not. I don’t think much of Noel or Zeller.
NS: Huh. Good to know. BTW, we fans are running a special. Zeller seems to be available with every trade.
Joey: Anyone ridiculing the Cavs for not taking Drummond needs to have their head examined. Drummond is a nice player. He has a chance to be an incredibly dominant big man. But, he still has enormous question marks: can he stay healthy? Can he play extended minutes without foul trouble? Can he not be a complete liability at the freethrow line? One of the secretly best players in the NBA the last several years has been Amir Johnson. No one knows how good he is because he doesn’t play enough minutes. Why? Cause, similarly, his foul rate is too high.… Read more »
If the Cavs go with Porter, Oladipo, McLemore, Bennett, or Len – I’m not going to whine. All good players and you all have made great arguments for your favorite. Each will bring something different that will improve the Cavs and make them enjoyable to watch next year.
All this banter is almost as much fun as the games.
Guaranteed success? No.
No brainer pick? Yes.
Nerlens Bowie? Seriously?
Taking any player #1 overall comes with risk, Nerlens’ injury history just ups the ante. In the end you have to go with the player you believe can advance your franchise the furthest. You could play it safe and come away with a nice role player a la Porter, Oladipo, etc… At the #1 spot you have to ask yourself what would be worse? Drafting the guy with the most potential only to lose him to injury or letting him slide to a team in your own conference that is also in the midst of a rebuild. In an arms… Read more »
@ Nate I agree that there is risk with any player. Most of the players on you’re list were healthly throughout their careers. I will say Joe Alexander and Hasheem Thabeet are the only recent ones which makes me feel more confident about the jobs that GM’s are doing. I guess my thought this whole time and my counter to the risk of NOT drafting him. Any player could be a bust, however if you swing and miss, I would swing and miss on a 6’11 hyperathletic potential defensive game changer. The Cavs have been riddiculed for not taking the… Read more »
This notion that anyone is a “guaranteed success” — even if he is perfectly healthy — is utterly ridiculous. The landscape is littered with notorious draft day busts: Michael Olowokandi, Adam Morrison, Wesley Johnson, Hasheem Thabeet, Joe Alexander, Darko, Tskitzivili, Kwame Brown, Joe Smith, Shawn Bradley, Danny Ferry, Chris Washburn, LaRue Martin, and Nerlens Bowie, er, I mean Sam Bowie.
I agree with those who think we should take Oladipo. His athleticism will transition well into the NBA. He’s also improved each year at Indy. I suppose he’s less of a need, but we still need solid perimeter defense, and he just seems to have that star potential… And he would fit into Browns defensive philosophy. According to experts, this draft class is deep, it just lacks top “no-brainer” superstar talent. If that’s the case, they can always address the needs with all the flexibility Grant has acquired. I won’t be upset if the selection any of the other 7-8… Read more »
Ok. I’m back.
PG/SG Erick Green has qualities that remind me of Damon Lillard. I think he has the potential to be a rotation player with Kyrie and Waiters. Listed at 6’3″ he led the NCAA in scoring. That’s why I think we should use at least one 2nd round pick.
I believe we come out of this draft with 2-3 players unless some sort of blockbuster trade occurs. Nerlens is the pick at #1 pending any setbacks in his rehabilitation, his long term franchise player potential outweighs the neuroticism of Cleveland fandom. I could see Grant packaging the 2nd round picks and maybe some other pieces for the Mavs 13 and Shawn Marion. Then the question would be do you stand pat at 13 and 19 and add say Franklin and Larkin, or try to move up even further for a guy like Shabazz.
I am looking forward to watching Noel playing pick and roll with Irving . . . and his dunks from Irving’s & Waiters’ penetrate and dish opportunities. Easily 12 ppg early in his career. (That’s without a 15 ft jumper.) I like the way he naturally uses his right and left hand when scoring. The guy has athleticism and several other uncanny qualities. I think he can develop an offensive game.
Signing off.
Finally, McLemore and Oladipo clearly have “game” that will cause any NBA fan to salivate. But as long as the Cavs have Irving and Waiters . . . all we’re going to do as fans is admire their talents from a distance. It’s just a simple fact. We have to use the #1 pick to build the team.
I think that Karasev can turn out to be a better offensive player than Otto Porter. But at the moment, I don’t think he can guard anybody in the NBA. Love every part of his diverse offensive game, but if NBA scouts agree with that assessment of his defensive ability and don’t feel he can improve on it – Bullock is the man. But there are a lot of good possibilities for 19. I will say this -one player drafted at 19 or later is going to make their mark on the NBA. Many Cavs fans view Chris Grant as… Read more »
And if, for some reason Nerlens Noel does not check out . . . all Cavs fans are going to be surprised when Grant’s 2013 “Tristan Thompson / Dion Waiters” equivalent turns out to be . . . Anthony Bennett. And I would be very pleased with that. I do not agree that Otto Porter is the safest pick in this draft. When I see Otto Porter’s “strengths” highlights I get as excited as everybody else. But when I see his “weakness” highlights his total lack of any type of ability to separate from NBA level athleticism. By no means… Read more »
I’m solidly in the camp that Nerlen Noels is a no brainer. There is always a certain risk of failure – with Noel as well as with all the top picks. The thing is, if Noel reaches his potential – he will become a super athletic, game changing player that will give the Cavs a dominant force in the paint and a championship caliber team. And, because elite bigs are so valuable you rarely have the opportunity to draft one. You must have the guts to deal with the risk involved. I’m sure that Porter, McLemore, and Oladipo will turn… Read more »
There is depth at Center but is it quality depth? I see Noel, Len, and Adams as potentially difference making bigs (and Cody Zeller who I include because I could see he playing with any of other curent bigs even though he’s more of a PF). With Deng, Withy, Olnyk, Gorbert, Plumlee, Noguiera, and everyone else they are either known commodities with flaws that will keep them from playing more than 25minutes a game or huge question marks. That being said here’s what my ideal board would be: 1. Noel. Our huge negative block differential is reason enough but he’s… Read more »
With the first pick I’d take Otto Porter. For the trade: All 4 picks(and throw in maybe Zeller or Miles) to Min for Kevin Love and the 9th pick. with the 9th pick, the Cavs select either Len or Zeller.
@Mike There is some serious depth at center in this draft. This probably isn’t like 2011 where people were debating if Williams and Knight are a better combo than Irving and Thompson. Waiting at center does make sense. Noel is just too ideal for what they need. They need a longterm answer to the leaky perimeter defense. Porter isn’t going to cover up Kyrie getting burned. Noel can. I’m pretty open to any of the top 5 or so players. Definitely still leaning Noel.
Ben McLemore. He’s going to be a star in this league. Worse case, he’s a very, very productive 6th man. I go with him and then draft size with the 19th pick.
I get that we are running low on patience, but this #1 pick doesn’t hold much value now. Most probable case is that Grant takes Noel and maintains his flexibility until someone is ready to trade a star. It’s going to happen in the next year. Grant will still have a ton of young players he can move and future draft picks. I don’t see him spending his cap room just to do it.
Anyone got any ideas on how we could possibly get the Suns deal done without Zeller or giving up the rest of our picks?
Kevin, I seem to recall some analytics person, maybe Pelton, saying Jackson is a real sleeper in this draft.
I am a Karasev guy at 19 but would happily take Mitchell or Crabbe there
My choices:
1. Noel
19. Karasev (although Tony Mitchell intrigues me here…anyone else think he’d be worth a shot? I like Caldwell Pope and Franklin but they both project as SGs more than SFs and I want a 3 with this pick)
31. Depends who is still on the board…I’d go for another wing and this would be my pecking order: Adetokoubo (draft and stash), Hardaway Jr., Bullock, Rice Jr., Snell
33. Mike Muscala
Other guys who interest me are CJ Leslie and Nate Wolters (if we don’t resign Livingston)
Guess I should mention that Noel’s doctor says he is “several weeks” ahead of schedule and the knee hasn’t experience any setbacks. At this point, I would much rather have Noel over Len (knee vs foot? no question)…but I think all trade options should be explored.
For effetive, fun, old man play, andre miller is the guy.
Kevin: I like Crabbe: shooting specialist with a bit of upside. I think 19’s a little high for him. I’d prefer Bullock, even though he’s older. Pierre Jackson? Meh. There’s about 5 point guards you could take there. I’d rather have Erick Green or Payton Siva. One is better on offense and the other is better on defense. Grant Jarrett? Color me intrigued. Nice find there. I certainly wouldn’t have a problem with taking a flier on Jarrett with the #33 pick. Andre Miller? My only problem with it is that Miller has never seemed like the mentoring type. Also,… Read more »
Too many people here look at Nerlens Noel and see his game immediately translating to the NBA…as if he’s going to step in and average a double/double with 3 blocks or whatever. That won’t happen.
This is why you get comments that trading Noel for Gortat/Dudley would get Grant fired. Really? Right now Gortat is BETTER than Noel. Next year Gortat will still probably be better than Noel. Noel isn’t about to come into the league and set the world on fire. Noel is a PROJECT, Anthony Davis wasn’t.
Cory: Well, Potopenko has Z ties too, since they were drafted together, and ties to Cleveland, but you may be right. If they’re going to take Len (ugh), I would sleep better with a trade down scenario like I just described. Gordon: the trade was the #1 and Zeller, for Gortat, Dudley, and the #5. I think you read it wrong. Here’s my problem with Porter. The old man problem doesn’t hurt him nearly as much on defense as it does on offense. It can be argued that Oladipo’s athleticism will help him score a lot more than Porter’s length… Read more »
@mallory I want Love or Horford out of a trade of the #1 pick. I would definitely get Danny Ferry on the horn and ask him who he would want at #1. Ferry is banking on Paul and Howard signing in Atlanta. If he misses out he might blow it up. The big fish deal might not happen until after free agency. If Love is the target it might not happen until the All-Star break.
As far as trade downs go that one could work. Gortat and Dudley help immediately. Phoenix gets the highest ceiling player in the draft and is primed to be the worst team in the league for the 2014 draft.
You don’t need an elite SF but you cannot win or challenge fir a title with an average one like David has posited. I wonder after David poo-poo’ed my assertion that Leonard was above average watched last night’s game and read Zach Lowe’s Grantland article mentioned earlier in to thread? Ha! As of for the draft, I think Noel and Porter are the 2 clear best players. It is not a “no-brainer” as Kevin points out. However, both have a WARP that suggests all-star level. I have come around on Noel after having a few “battles” with David and others.… Read more »
@nate I could live with that trade scenario with Phoenix. I think Len is Grant’s guy though. It seem odd that a player who hasn’t received much #1 pick consideration is still being linked to Cleveland. If Grant takes Len #1 he’s going to get blasted. The Vitaly Potapenko hire set off alarms to me. Was he hired to help Len acclimate to the NBA and American culture? Some of Len’s struggles at Maryland were communication based. Vitaly wasn’t an in demand assistant. He was with the Pacers for the 2010-11 season and let go by Frank Vogel. Vogel was… Read more »
@tom Totally agree with the value at the center position being in the teens this year. There will be 9 or 10 centers that go in the first and someone after Noel will be solid. No other position succeeds outside of the lottery like center.
Man that groupthink narrative has come crumbling down eh?
Aaron, All I see from your list is Roy Hibbert. Oladipo, the next Roy Hibbert! Seriously though, Changing it to > 59/43 (which include Olidapo) and at least one 3 attempt a game results in Derrick williams as the only other guy in a good conference. He was a tweener too, but wasn’t seen as nearly the defensive prospect that Oladipo is. He was more of a “His offense is so good we’ll worry about his defense later” prospect and he went #2 overall. Not a great start so far for a # pick admittedly, so maybe its not saying… Read more »
@David – can you address why Noel is the guy if the Cavs are hell bent on making the playoffs this season? In 3 years, if he completely recovers from his injury, Noel will most likely be better than the 5 other centers that will go in the first round. But how does he help you make the playoffs next April? Or is all that talk about winning now just to get a season ticket boost?
I really like Oladipo. But he’s a SG and we have Waiters, who I also like.
For the “Noel = No-Brainer” people…how many knee surgeries would it take before selecting a guy requires a little bit of thought from you? Obviously it’s not two. Is it three? Four? Please say it’s not five; that would be crazy. Regarding the “As long as the doctors say it’s ok…” thing, I don’t know why that would be treated as gospel, as if there is a finite scientific determination about how a knee will respond to 15 years of high-torque pounding. I realize any one of these guys could wreck a knee tomorrow…but two surgeries on the same knee… Read more »
On another subject: How about Allen Crabbe? Pierre Jackson? Grant Jerrett? Andre Miller?
I mean, I dominated this 5 on 5, right? Let’s talk about that for a minute.
Some of the things said in the article and the comments make my head want to explode. #1 for Gortat and Dudley? Are you kidding me? You’re be fired within 10 minutes of making that idiotic trade. Someone mentioned #1, AV, and a future #1 for Al Horford? Probably fired within 5 minutes of making that idiotic trade. You take Nerlens Noel in this draft because 1) he fills a need and 2) he’s the best talent in the draft. This is such a no-brainer it’s ridiculous (as long as the doctors clear him). He’ll be evaluated before the draft… Read more »
It’s incorrect to say that higher leaping ability cancels out height, wingspan, standing reach – there’s an important difference, defensively, to being able to reach wider laterally – or to be able to reach higher without leaving your feet. When Tristan was jumping everywhere to block things his first year, his defense wasn’t as good. Huge advantage to be able to interfere with shots without leaving your feet. Five inches in standing reach should translate to a greater ability to alter shots without overcommitting and having someone drive past you.
This list is probably a lil better
http://cbbref.com/tiny/VVClV
Aaron,
Oladipo had twice as many steals as any one on your second list, with the exception of Vince Carter. (did mcdermott really play 1100 minutes and total 7 steals and 3 blocks? that is amazing.) Interestingly, as the one non forward or center on the this, he had the third most rebounds and blocked shots. As noted by others, he played a stronger schedule than many in the group.
Oladipo is pretty unique.
Aaron, He said, “guys in decent conferences.” That eliminates everyone but Victor, D.J. Stephens, James Augustine, Ryan Bowen, and Michael Harrison. Ryan Bowen was a 7 year NBA vet, and James Augustine is still playing in Europe. Not an auspicious list, but not the worst thing.
Noel is a better defensive prospect than Davis.
@ Aaron Noel is the best defensive prospect since…last year, when Anthony Davis went first. He’s hardly a generational talent. And I really see no reason why Horford or Love would be traded by their respective teams. Horford is on a very affordable deal and the Hawks wouldn’t need to move him even in the event that they sign Howard and CP3. Love is supposedly happy with the direction the franchise is moving and they have no reason to trade him this offseason. Same with Aldridge…these teams are trying to build, not rebuild. I see a lot of people referencing… Read more »
To Swirving:
http://cbbref.com/tiny/wSVWN
List of players who shot 60/44 and qualified for fg% title. Lots of great NBA players (or not).
KyrieSwIrving: In answer to your question about players in decent conferences who shot even close 60/44, there were 4 guys besides Oladipo who got close: Cory Jefferson, Baylor: .613/.375 T.J. Warren, NC State: .622/.519 Both of them are going to be back in college (Warren could be a lottery pick this year, and he’s projected to be 16th next year). Alex Poythress, Kentucky: .581/.424 D.J. Stephens: Memphis: .629/.361 We all know about Poythress. He’s also going back to school. Stephens was almost one of my second round picks. He’s insanely athletic: 46″ max vert, 2.98 3/4 sprint (yes, you read… Read more »
The combine info is useless. All I know is when I watch Porter move laterally, he looks slow. And he is a below the rim player. Kawhi, not so much. You won’t find one person that says Leonard is not a better athlete than Porter.
In response to Aaron’s comments on Porter’s athletic ability, and Nate’s “old man” comments…why does it matter how Porter looks? Draftexpress has 93 small forwards in their database for 2013. Of those, per 40 minutes pace adjusted, Porter ranked: – 5th for steals – 14th for free throw attempts – 16th for rebounds – 24th for blocks I’m just picking random stats that indicate some level of athleticism. According to kenpom.com, Georgetown had the 4th best defense in the NCAA this year. According to statsheet, Georgetown was +255 when he played and -6 when he sat. For an unathletic old… Read more »
Surprising amount of love for Dieng with #19. Wasn’t this guy terrible in the combine? And he’s 23.
As much as I’d like to see Porter on this Cavs team, just seems like it’s NN or blockbuster trade at #1.
Best trade: Nate’s proposed fleecing of the Suns (love the idea of adding vets and trading down for Oladipo).
Worst trade: Mallory’s kitchen sink all-in for KLove (dude gets injured more than Kyrie, can’t play D and if he’s unhappy in one small market, cold weather town, chances are he wouldn’t be much happier in Cle).
What? Kawhi’s no elite athlete, he’s just a smart defender. Smarts matter a lot more than athleticism. Either way, Porter measured out as more athletic than Kawhi in pretty much every way at the combine.
The Paul George argument should be to the idea of taking a great athlete in the draft and hoping he develops into something special, not that we must draft a SF because there are many good ones in the league; To think about it a little differently because there are so many young small forwards in the league it is possible to grab one without losing Noel. Thabo Sefolosha, Jeffery Taylor, DeMar DeRozan, Rudy Gay, Josh Smith, Luol Deng, Jimmy Butler, Evan Turner, Martell Webster, Maurice Harkless or Tobias Harris, Al-Farouq Aminu, Corey Brewer, DeMarre Carroll, Perry Jones III, Ronnie… Read more »
Aaron, the comparison with Kyrie’s shooting was that they both had small sample sizes in the year they were drafted.
That picture is a 10cm digit, not a 10″ digit.
Porter does not have nearly the athleticism that Kawhi had.
Porter seems like Kawhi Leonard with a more complete offensive game. Given that Kawhi is arguably the 2nd best player in his draft at this point, it’s hard to get too upset about that.
lol so now we’ve had two people other than Nerlens called no brainers. And you did not just compare Oladipo to Kyrie, shooting wise. Come on. Kyrie had never shown that he was a bad shooter. Oladipo had shown he was a pretty awful shooter. That’s just a lazy comparison. I like Oladipo. If he was 6’7” or 6’8” the debate between him and Nerlens would be awesome, but at less than 6’5”? No. YOU HAVE THE CHANCE TO ADD THE BEST DEFENSIVE PROSPECT IN THE DRAFT IN WHO KNOWS HOW MANY YEARS, STOP OVER-THINKING IT.
I’m a Noel guy, so I guess I think three of my cohorts are “wrong”, but I do think that people acting like it’s a no brainer are “wrong” too. Noel has missed significant parts of two of his last four seasons due to surgeries on the same knee. I don’t care what the doctors end up saying, that is still a concern. They’re not solving a math equation; there is plently of inpredictability about any player’s longterm health, let alone a guy with a history of injury.
The Horford trade talk is actually even more ridiculous than the Love trade talk. Horford is a young, healthy, uber efficient all-star, and plays on a very reasonable contract with three years left on it. The only way Atlanta trades him is if they completely strike out in free agency and decide to blow up the entire team. The problem is, they probably wouldn’t trade him then either. He’s practically the only contract on their books, and he’s a player they can build around. He would go #1 in the current draft. Why would Atlanta trade him for anyone in… Read more »
Kyrie: I agree with you that he’s head and shoulders above Allen, but his sample size on shooting from behind the arc last year is small, and his usage wasn’t super high. Have you watched the DraftExpress video on Oladipo? http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=MgWJGiJJAwk It will make you like him even more. Basically, Oladipo’s biggest weaknesses are being too right side dominant on the drive, and that he plays a little faster than his ball handling ability at times, resulting in turnovers. Both of those problems are eminently fixable. The final knock was “were his shooting numbers real?” Well, that’s what we wondered… Read more »
@SwIrving- if Olapido was 6’7″, I would agree with you. At 6’5″, he doesn’t fit with Waiters & Kyrie, despite the complimentary skillset. There’s not enough minutes for those three to justify it, even if Olapido can play an occasional 10 minutes at SF. Sorry. Now, if the Cavs were willing to parlay Waiters into a veteran SF….sign me up. @OttoPorter- I agree with the Horford trade, and I have to admit I’m a little surprised it’s not getting more attention. Something like this year’s #1, a future #1 and Varejao should do it. Of course it makes sense for… Read more »
I’m kind of leaning Oladipo. If he had done what he did as a sophomore, he’d be a no brainer. His age is a concern, but the kid had an absolutely phenomenal junior year. You compare him to a better tony allen, but really, his offense isn’t even in the same ballpark as tony Allen during their age 20 seasons (did tony allen fall back a grade or redshirt? he was 20 as a freshman…). 60/44/75 is just absolutely bonkers. If tony allen was an elite 3 point shooter and elite cutter/finisher, he’d be a perenial all-star. I’m a little… Read more »
David
Thanks for injecting some much needed realism into this blog. I cannot believe that all 5 people didn’t take Noel. The consensus best player at a position of need. It’s the perfect scenario.
So Paul George is proof that an elite SF is needed? What about the Spurs? Grizz? I guess they are irrelevant since they disprove your argument? Who was the last team to win with an elite SF besides the Heat? The Celtics, one time, five years ago? And before that? Seriously tell me the last team, besides last year’s Heat and the 2008 Celtics to win with an elite SF. And as David mentioned, KLove is not available. He went to the freaking lottery for his team. Go find some quotes of him and Saunders since they got rid of… Read more »
I watched the DraftExpress Nerlens Noel video and creamed myself. He could by mega-Tyson Chandler given time to evolve. That type of player is impossible to get hold of in trade/free agency and his partnership with Kyrie could be a franchise changing.
Yes he’s a risk but it’s a risk you’ve got to take unless an amazing trade lands in our lap.
As Jacob Rosen has pointed out at WFNY, there is a consensus number one pick, and it was the consensus all season long: His name is Nerlens Noel, and he plays a position the Cavs have a huge hole at, and has an elite skill the Cavs are in dire need of acquiring. As Kevin says, the only concern should be his knee, and his doctor says he is progressing ahead of schedule.
Kevin Love talk? For real?
Tom, you said: “They most certainly did not draft for need, nor did they consider value added when you realize that adding a B+ power forward when you have a C+ power forward and an A- power forward playing center (out of position) adds less value than drafting a legitimate center to replace Ryan Hollins.”
Anderson Varejao is a legit center in this league (chock full of weak centers.) I’d say he’s a better fit at Center now than he is at PF (especially with the Stretch 4 being so in vogue right now.)
I think this draft isn’t nearly as bad as everyone is making it out to be. It’s not the ideal year to have the #1 pick but I think there is a lot of depth through the first 40 picks or so and we just so happen to have 4 of the top 33 picks. I’m really excited to see what CG does with all of these assets! I think it’s safe to say we won’t be walking away with 4 rookies.
I agree with Ross. The draft is similar to 2011; there will be plenty of good players to come out of it. Unfortunately there isn’t a surefire superstar, so the media label it as a bad class.
I also agree with Tom’s assessment of the players with “star” potential in the class. Two play positions that the Cavs drafted in 2011, and the second, otherwise most obvious choice, is working on knee surgery #2.
It will be very interesting to see what, if anything, develops over the next 3 weeks.
Oh, and Go Spurs!
Come on! Have a little faith in Chris Grant. As a Cavs fan I’m nervous. But getting to watch a GM really try to shape a team though the draft with no restrictions from the owner is fascinating to me. Whatever happens is going to be an “oh shit! here we go” moment that should have us all talking for awhile. Looking forward to it, and hoping for the best.
Yeah me too. Actually this whole draft makes me sad.
Otto Porter at #1 makes me sad.
I still think a Horford Trade makes the most sense outside of packaging 19, 31, and 33 to move up 5-7 slots.
Tom, Nate, Mallory,
So only two of us picked Nerlens?
Personally, I am not concerned about his weight or offense…just the two knee surgeries. Are your concerns primarily knee related, or is it something else?